Literature DB >> 27366370

Can we Improve Outcome in High Risk Surgery?

Andras Mikor1, Zsolt Molnar1.   

Abstract

Despite the small number of high-risk surgical patients in comparison to all surgical patients, they account for the largest proportion of overall perioperative mortality. Goal directed hemodynamic support may result in a lower incidence of complications and reduced length of hospital stay in these patients. Beyond the standard monitoring of circulation, such as blood pressure and heart rate, further parameters and procedures such as pulse pressure/stroke volume variation-, stroke volume/cardiac index-, and central venous oxygen saturation-guided resuscitation may improve the outcome of high-risk surgical patients. The aim of this review is to focus on the results of animal and clinical studies investigating the usefulness of these indices in the context of goal-directed perioperative support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-risk surgery; central venous oxygen saturation; goal directed therapy; improved outcome; pulse pressure variation; stroke volume

Year:  2013        PMID: 27366370      PMCID: PMC4894207          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2013.1630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  39 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.

Authors:  K Holte; N E Sharrock; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery.

Authors:  Hui Qiao; Jun Zhang; Wei-min Liang
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.956

4.  Hemodynamic patterns of survivors and nonsurvivors during high risk elective surgical operations.

Authors:  W C Shoemaker; C C Wo; D Thangathurai; G Velmahos; H Belzberg; J A Asensio; D Demetriades
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Influence of central venous oxygen saturation on in-hospital mortality of surgical patients.

Authors:  João Manoel Silva; Amanda Maria Ribas Rosa Oliveira; Sandra Zucchi de Morais; Luciana Sales de Araújo; Luiz Gustavo F Victoria; Lauro Yoiti Marubayashi
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.964

6.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992.

Authors:  A A Gawande; E J Thomas; M J Zinner; T A Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Is clinical assessment of the circulation reliable in postoperative cardiac surgical patients?

Authors:  Robert A F Linton; Nick W F Linton; Fiona Kelly
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia.

Authors:  A K Kable; R W Gibberd; A D Spigelman
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 9.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcel R Lopes; Marcos A Oliveira; Vanessa Oliveira S Pereira; Ivaneide Paula B Lemos; Jose Otavio C Auler; Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.