Literature DB >> 11854870

Is clinical assessment of the circulation reliable in postoperative cardiac surgical patients?

Robert A F Linton1, Nick W F Linton, Fiona Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study adult patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery and determine whether cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) are generally within normal limits and whether clinical assessment of CO provides an adequate approximation to guide treatment.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Overnight intensive recovery unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients who had undergone cardiac surgery within the previous 5 hours and whose COs were not being measured.
INTERVENTIONS: The physician (if present) or nurse managing the patient was asked to make a clinical estimate (as low, normal, or high) of CO and of SVR. CO was measured by lithium dilution. The clinically estimated values were compared with the measured values, after adjusting for patient size.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 29 of 50 (58%) patients, cardiac index (CI) (20 of 50 [40%] patients) or systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (22 of 50 [44%] patients) was outside normal limits (CI, 2.7 (plus minus 30%) L/min/m(2); SVRI, 2,500 (plus minus 30%) dyne center dot sec center dot cm(minus sign 5)/m(2)). When CI was outside the normal range, the clinical estimate was usually wrong (13 of 20 [65%]); when SVRI was outside the normal range, the clinical estimate was also usually wrong (16 of 22 [73%]).
CONCLUSIONS: In the early postoperative period after cardiac surgery, clinical assessment of the circulatory state is frequently misleading, and there should be a low threshold for measuring CO. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11854870     DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2002.29631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  7 in total

Review 1.  Can we Improve Outcome in High Risk Surgery?

Authors:  Andras Mikor; Zsolt Molnar
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 2.  Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Toby E Reynolds; Nawaf Al-Subaie; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  András Mikor; Domonkos Trásy; Márton F Németh; Angelika Osztroluczki; Szilvia Kocsi; Ildikó Kovács; Gábor Demeter; Zsolt Molnár
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 4.  Clinical examination for diagnosing circulatory shock.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Ruben J Eck; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Mean arterial pressure targeted fluid resuscitation may lead to fluid overload: A bleeding-resuscitation animal experiment.

Authors:  Nándor Öveges; Ildikó László; Krisztián Tánczos; Márton Németh; Gábor Lebák; Bianca-Andreea Tudor-Drobjewski; Dániel Érces; József Kaszaki; László Rudas; Wolfgang Huber; Zsolt Molnár
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Goal-Directed Resuscitation Aiming Cardiac Index Masks Residual Hypovolemia: An Animal Experiment.

Authors:  Krisztián Tánczos; Márton Németh; Domonkos Trásy; Ildikó László; Péter Palágyi; Zsolt Szabó; Gabriella Varga; József Kaszaki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Volume-replacement ratio for crystalloids and colloids during bleeding and resuscitation: an animal experiment.

Authors:  Ildikó László; Gábor Demeter; Nándor Öveges; Dániel Érces; József Kaszaki; Krisztián Tánczos; Zsolt Molnár
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2017-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.