Sara K Rostanski1, Joshua Stillman2, Olajide Williams1, Randolph S Marshall1, Shadi Yaghi3, Joshua Z Willey1. 1. Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reducing door-to-imaging (DIT) time is a major focus of acute stroke quality improvement initiatives to promote rapid thrombolysis. However, recent data suggest that the imaging-to-needle (ITN) time is a greater source of treatment delay. We hypothesized that language discordance between physician and patient would contribute to prolonged ITN time, as rapidly taking a history and confirming last known well require facile communication between physician and patient. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in our emergency department between July 2011 and December 2014. Baseline characteristics and relevant time intervals were compared between encounters where the treating neurologist and patient spoke the same language (concordant cases) and where they did not (discordant cases). RESULTS: A total of 279 patients received tPA during the study period. English was the primary language for 51%, Spanish for 46%, and other languages for 3%; 59% of cases were classified as language concordant and 41% as discordant. We found no differences in median DIT (24 vs 25, P = .5), ITN time (33 vs 30, P = .3), or door-to-needle time (DTN; 58 vs 55, P = .1) between concordant and discordant groups. Similarly, among patients with the fastest and slowest ITN times, there were no differences. CONCLUSION: In a high-volume stroke center with a large proportion of Spanish speakers, language discordance was not associated with changes in DIT, ITN time, or DTN time.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reducing door-to-imaging (DIT) time is a major focus of acute stroke quality improvement initiatives to promote rapid thrombolysis. However, recent data suggest that the imaging-to-needle (ITN) time is a greater source of treatment delay. We hypothesized that language discordance between physician and patient would contribute to prolonged ITN time, as rapidly taking a history and confirming last known well require facile communication between physician and patient. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in our emergency department between July 2011 and December 2014. Baseline characteristics and relevant time intervals were compared between encounters where the treating neurologist and patient spoke the same language (concordant cases) and where they did not (discordant cases). RESULTS: A total of 279 patients received tPA during the study period. English was the primary language for 51%, Spanish for 46%, and other languages for 3%; 59% of cases were classified as language concordant and 41% as discordant. We found no differences in median DIT (24 vs 25, P = .5), ITN time (33 vs 30, P = .3), or door-to-needle time (DTN; 58 vs 55, P = .1) between concordant and discordant groups. Similarly, among patients with the fastest and slowest ITN times, there were no differences. CONCLUSION: In a high-volume stroke center with a large proportion of Spanish speakers, language discordance was not associated with changes in DIT, ITN time, or DTN time.
Authors: Nyika D Kruyt; Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin Dennis; Didier Leys; Peter A Ringleb; Anthony G Rudd; Marinus Vermeulen; Jan Stam; Werner Hacke; Yvo B Roos Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mariana C Martins; José E Diaz; Raziel Valiño; Naa Oyo A Kwate; Ana F Abraido-Lanza Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Ava L Liberman; Eric M Liotta; Fan Z Caprio; Ilana Ruff; Matthew B Maas; Richard A Bernstein; Rahul Khare; Deborah Bergman; Shyam Prabhakaran Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2015-06
Authors: Werner Hacke; Geoffrey Donnan; Cesare Fieschi; Markku Kaste; Rüdiger von Kummer; Joseph P Broderick; Thomas Brott; Michael Frankel; James C Grotta; E Clarke Haley; Thomas Kwiatkowski; Steven R Levine; Chris Lewandowski; Mei Lu; Patrick Lyden; John R Marler; Suresh Patel; Barbara C Tilley; Gregory Albers; Erich Bluhmki; Manfred Wilhelm; Scott Hamilton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Atte Meretoja; Louise Weir; Melissa Ugalde; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Peter Hand; Melinda Truesdale; Stephen M Davis; Bruce C V Campbell Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Andria L Ford; Jennifer A Williams; Mary Spencer; Craig McCammon; Naim Khoury; Tomoko R Sampson; Peter Panagos; Jin-Moo Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Anika L Hines; Roxanne M Andrews; Ernest Moy; Marguerite L Barrett; Rosanna M Coffey Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sara K Rostanski; Benjamin R Kummer; Eliza C Miller; Randolph S Marshall; Olajide Williams; Joshua Z Willey Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2018-09-27