BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Earlier tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment for acute ischemic stroke increases efficacy, prompting national efforts to reduce door-to-needle times. We used lean process improvement methodology to develop a streamlined intravenous tPA protocol. METHODS: In early 2011, a multidisciplinary team analyzed the steps required to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke with intravenous tPA using value stream analysis (VSA). We directly compared the tPA-treated patients in the "pre-VSA" epoch with the "post-VSA" epoch with regard to baseline characteristics, protocol metrics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The VSA revealed several tPA protocol inefficiencies: routing of patients to room, then to CT, then back to the room; serial processing of workflow; and delays in waiting for laboratory results. On March 1, 2011, a new protocol incorporated changes to minimize delays: routing patients directly to head CT before the patient room, using parallel process workflow, and implementing point-of-care laboratories. In the pre and post-VSA epochs, 132 and 87 patients were treated with intravenous tPA, respectively. Compared with pre-VSA, door-to-needle times and percent of patients treated ≤60 minutes from hospital arrival were improved in the post-VSA epoch: 60 minutes versus 39 minutes (P<0.0001) and 52% versus 78% (P<0.0001), respectively, with no change in symptomatic hemorrhage rate. CONCLUSIONS: Lean process improvement methodology can expedite time-dependent stroke care without compromising safety.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Earlier tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment for acute ischemic stroke increases efficacy, prompting national efforts to reduce door-to-needle times. We used lean process improvement methodology to develop a streamlined intravenous tPA protocol. METHODS: In early 2011, a multidisciplinary team analyzed the steps required to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke with intravenous tPA using value stream analysis (VSA). We directly compared the tPA-treated patients in the "pre-VSA" epoch with the "post-VSA" epoch with regard to baseline characteristics, protocol metrics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The VSA revealed several tPA protocol inefficiencies: routing of patients to room, then to CT, then back to the room; serial processing of workflow; and delays in waiting for laboratory results. On March 1, 2011, a new protocol incorporated changes to minimize delays: routing patients directly to head CT before the patient room, using parallel process workflow, and implementing point-of-care laboratories. In the pre and post-VSA epochs, 132 and 87 patients were treated with intravenous tPA, respectively. Compared with pre-VSA, door-to-needle times and percent of patients treated ≤60 minutes from hospital arrival were improved in the post-VSA epoch: 60 minutes versus 39 minutes (P<0.0001) and 52% versus 78% (P<0.0001), respectively, with no change in symptomatic hemorrhage rate. CONCLUSIONS: Lean process improvement methodology can expedite time-dependent stroke care without compromising safety.
Authors: Ville Artto; Jukka Putaala; Daniel Strbian; Atte Meretoja; Katja Piironen; Ron Liebkind; Heli Silvennoinen; Sari Atula; Olli Häppölä Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: O Y Chernyshev; S Martin-Schild; K C Albright; A Barreto; V Misra; I Acosta; J C Grotta; S I Savitz Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Robert Mikulík; Pavla Kadlecová; Anna Czlonkowska; Adam Kobayashi; Miroslav Brozman; Viktor Svigelj; Laszlo Csiba; Klara Fekete; Janika Kõrv; Vida Demarin; Aleksandras Vilionskis; Dalius Jatuzis; Yakup Krespi; Niaz Ahmed Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Eric E Smith; Gregg C Fonarow; Mathew J Reeves; Xin Zhao; Daiwai M Olson; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Jeffrey L Saver; Mathew J Reeves; Deepak L Bhatt; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; DaiWai M Olson; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Werner Hacke; Geoffrey Donnan; Cesare Fieschi; Markku Kaste; Rüdiger von Kummer; Joseph P Broderick; Thomas Brott; Michael Frankel; James C Grotta; E Clarke Haley; Thomas Kwiatkowski; Steven R Levine; Chris Lewandowski; Mei Lu; Patrick Lyden; John R Marler; Suresh Patel; Barbara C Tilley; Gregory Albers; Erich Bluhmki; Manfred Wilhelm; Scott Hamilton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David T Winkler; Felix Fluri; Peter Fuhr; Stephan G Wetzel; Philippe A Lyrer; Stephan Ruegg; Stefan T Engelter Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Marie Luby; Karen Poole; Teresa Morella; Elizabeth Keller; Richard T Benson; John K Lynch; Zurab Nadareishvili; Amie W Hsia Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David Curfman; Lisa Tabor Connor; Hawnwan Philip Moy; Laura Heitsch; Peter Panagos; Jin-Moo Lee; David K Tan; Andria L Ford Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: K D Vo; A J Yoo; A Gupta; Y Qiao; A S Vagal; J A Hirsch; D M Yousem; C Lum Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Liqiong Fan; Bijoy K Menon; Andrew M Demchuk; Sharon D Yeatts; Michael D Hill; Thomas Tomsick; Pooja Khatri; Osama O Zaidat; Edward C Jauch; Muneer Eesa; Tudor G Jovin; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sara K Rostanski; Joshua Stillman; Olajide Williams; Randolph S Marshall; Shadi Yaghi; Joshua Z Willey Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2016-04-14