Hua Lin1, Shaan Patel1, Valerie S Affleck1, Ian Wilson1, Douglass M Turnbull1, Abhijit R Joshi1, Ross Maxwell1, Elizabeth A Stoll2. 1. M.Sc. Programme in Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (H.L., V.S.A.); Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (H.L., V.S.A.); B.Sc. Programme in Physiology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (S.P.); Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (I.W., R.M.); Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (D.M.T., E.A.S.); Centre for Brain Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (D.M.T.); Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (D.M.T.); Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (A.R.J.). 2. M.Sc. Programme in Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (H.L., V.S.A.); Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (H.L., V.S.A.); B.Sc. Programme in Physiology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (S.P.); Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (I.W., R.M.); Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (D.M.T., E.A.S.); Centre for Brain Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (D.M.T.); Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (D.M.T.); Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (A.R.J.) elizabeth.stoll@ncl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioma is the most common form of primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with approximately 4 cases per 100 000 people each year. Gliomas, like many tumors, are thought to primarily metabolize glucose for energy production; however, the reliance upon glycolysis has recently been called into question. In this study, we aimed to identify the metabolic fuel requirements of human glioma cells. METHODS: We used database searches and tissue culture resources to evaluate genotype and protein expression, tracked oxygen consumption rates to study metabolic responses to various substrates, performed histochemical techniques and fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based mitotic profiling to study cellular proliferation rates, and employed an animal model of malignant glioma to evaluate a new therapeutic intervention. RESULTS: We observed the presence of enzymes required for fatty acid oxidation within human glioma tissues. In addition, we demonstrated that this metabolic pathway is a major contributor to aerobic respiration in primary-cultured cells isolated from human glioma and grown under serum-free conditions. Moreover, inhibiting fatty acid oxidation reduces proliferative activity in these primary-cultured cells and prolongs survival in a syngeneic mouse model of malignant glioma. CONCLUSIONS: Fatty acid oxidation enzymes are present and active within glioma tissues. Targeting this metabolic pathway reduces energy production and cellular proliferation in glioma cells. The drug etomoxir may provide therapeutic benefit to patients with malignant glioma. In addition, the expression of fatty acid oxidation enzymes may provide prognostic indicators for clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Glioma is the most common form of primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with approximately 4 cases per 100 000 people each year. Gliomas, like many tumors, are thought to primarily metabolize glucose for energy production; however, the reliance upon glycolysis has recently been called into question. In this study, we aimed to identify the metabolic fuel requirements of human glioma cells. METHODS: We used database searches and tissue culture resources to evaluate genotype and protein expression, tracked oxygen consumption rates to study metabolic responses to various substrates, performed histochemical techniques and fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based mitotic profiling to study cellular proliferation rates, and employed an animal model of malignant glioma to evaluate a new therapeutic intervention. RESULTS: We observed the presence of enzymes required for fatty acid oxidation within human glioma tissues. In addition, we demonstrated that this metabolic pathway is a major contributor to aerobic respiration in primary-cultured cells isolated from human glioma and grown under serum-free conditions. Moreover, inhibiting fatty acid oxidation reduces proliferative activity in these primary-cultured cells and prolongs survival in a syngeneic mouse model of malignant glioma. CONCLUSIONS: Fatty acid oxidation enzymes are present and active within glioma tissues. Targeting this metabolic pathway reduces energy production and cellular proliferation in glioma cells. The drug etomoxir may provide therapeutic benefit to patients with malignant glioma. In addition, the expression of fatty acid oxidation enzymes may provide prognostic indicators for clinical practice.
Glioma is the most common form of primary malignant brain tumor in adults. In >50% of
cases, this tumor manifests as a grade IV astrocytoma (called glioblastoma or GBM), a
highly malignant and invasive tumor with median patient survival of 12 months from diagnosis.[1] Lower-grade gliomas increase in malignancy over time, with associated increases
in mortality.[2] There are no major heritable factors in the risk of glioma occurrence, and
treatments including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and the chemotherapeutic drug
temozolomide only minimally slow the course of this disease. There is a great need to
develop novel targets for therapeutic intervention.In the 1950s, Otto Warburg observed that tumors primarily
metabolized glucose; instead of using the end product (pyruvate) to drive oxidative
metabolism, the cells converted pyruvate into lactate and released it into the
extracellular space. This dependence upon glycolysis instead of oxidative metabolism,
(known as the Warburg effect) was first characterized in sarcomas and later shown in
other cancers.[3] Warburg hypothesized that this glycolytic switch was the initiating event during
oncogenic transformation. Although it is now understood that cancers arise from genetic
abnormalities affecting oncogene and tumor suppressor pathways, the possibility remains
that targeting catabolic pathways required for cellular energy production may be a
fruitful clinical strategy.Like other tumors, gliomas have been thought to rely upon glycolysis for energy
production, yet recent results from human NMR spectroscopy studies suggest that glucose
contributes to <50% of acetyl-CoA production in gliomas.[4] While the metabolic substrates preferred by these tumors have not been
identified, other cancers have been shown to utilize alternative fuels for energy
production and synthesis of raw materials.[5] Fatty acid chains can be used to produce energy within a growing tumor;[6] prostate and breast cancer cells in particular have been specifically shown to
employ fatty acid oxidation as a metabolic strategy.[7,8] Etomoxir, an inhibitor of fatty acid oxidation, has been shown to decrease oxygen
consumption rates (OCRs) and impair ATP and NADPH production in the pediatric
glioblastoma cell line SF188.[9] Various substrates, including glucose, can be converted into fatty acids
intracellularly; gliomas express fatty acid synthase (FASN), and expression of this
enzyme increases with malignant grade.[10]High levels of glycolysis have been primarily reported based upon the study of glioma
cell lines that have adapted to culture conditions. It has recently been shown that
patient-derived glioma cells cultured in the absence of serum retain their original
characteristics and are more suitable for chemical and genetic screening.[11,12] In this report, we show that fatty acid oxidation is in fact the primary
catabolic pathway in human glioblastoma cells (hGBMs) maintained under such optimal
culture conditions. Blocking this pathway reduces cellular respiratory and proliferative
activity. Enzymes required for fatty acid oxidation are expressed and functional in
human glioblastoma tissues, and upregulation of genes encoding enzymes in this pathway
predicts worse survival in human patients with astrocytoma (although this effect is not
significant in high-grade glioblastoma). Finally, we show that pharmacological
inhibition of fatty acid oxidation prolongs survival in a syngeneic mouse model of
malignant glioma in the context of a blinded, placebo-controlled preclinical trial.
These findings present a new target that may aid in the clinical treatment of this
disease.
Materials and Methods
REMBRANDT Database Search
Comparisons of patient survival on the basis of genotype were performed using 2
databases: the REpository of Molecular BRAin Neoplasia DaTa (REMBRANDT) and The
Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), which provide coordinated molecular genetic data and
clinical data from patients with brain tumors.[13,14] All genes encoding enzymes in the fatty acid oxidation pathway were searched
(Supplementary material, Table S1). Data mining and statistical
analysis were performed with Project Betastasis software (http://www.betastasis.com/glioma/). Significant results yielded by
Kaplan-Meier survival tests are reported as log-ranked P values for
significance of difference in survival between groups. Previously published clinical
and microarray data for low-grade glioma from the TCGA database[14] were downloaded from https://genome-cancer.soe.ucsc.edu/proj/site/hgHeatmap/?datasetSearch=low+grade+glioma+TCGA,
and specific transcripts were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA in SigmaPlot. Median gene
expression level was used as the cutoff for comparing clinical outcomes.
Immunohistochemistry
All tissues were obtained with consent from patients under approval from Newcastle
upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Twenty-eight samples identified as
glioblastomas on the basis of clinical presentation and histological analysis were
employed to investigate protein expression levels. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded
tissue blocks were obtained from the Cellular Pathology Department at the Royal
Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle. Blocks were sectioned into 5 µm and dried
overnight. The sections were placed in a 60°C oven for 30 minutes, moved
directly into Histoclear, and then hydrated in decreasing concentrations of
ethanol.For antigen retrieval, cells were subjected to 0.01 M sodium
citrate at 100°C for 10 minutes. Sections were then rinsed with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Nonspecific staining was blocked for 2 hours in PBS
with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 5% donkey serum. Sections were incubated overnight at
4°C with appropriate primary antibodies and for 2 hours at room temperature
with secondary antibodies (Supplementary material, Table S2). Sections were then co-stained with
1 µg/mL Hoechst. Coverslips were mounted over sections, and fluorescence
microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Apoptome microscope with attached camera and
Axiovision software.
Serum-free Primary Culture of hGBMs
hGBMs G144, G166, and GliNS2, which had been originally cultured in the lab of
Professor Austin Smith, were obtained from a BioRep cryogenic storage facility
(Milan, Italy). The cells were maintained in sterile, serum-free culture in NeuroCult
Basal Medium (Stem Cell Technologies 05750) with NeuroCult Proliferation Supplement
(Stem Cell Technologies 05753). NeuroCult Proliferation Medium was supplemented with
20 ng/mL bFGF (Peprotech 100-18) and 20 ng/mL EGF (Peprotech 100-15). This complete
medium was used as the growth medium for cell culture. Cells were passaged every 4
days by dissociating with Accutase (Sigma A6964). In vitro experiments were performed
with all 3 biological replicates. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based
mitotic profiling contained 6 technical replicates for each biological replicate, and
Seahorse Analyzer experiments contained 5 technical replicates for each biological
replicate.
Serum-free Primary Culture of Oncogenically Transformed Mouse NSCs
Neural stem cells (NSCs) were isolated from the adult wild-type C57B/6 mouse brain as
previously described.[15] The cells were oncogenically transformed in vitro as previously described.[16] These glioma-initiating cells were maintained in serum-free growth media
consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 (Omega Scientific
DM-25) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 1% N2 (Gibco), 20 ng/mL epidermal growth
factor, and 20 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor-2 (Peprotech). In vitro experiments
were performed with 3 biological replicates (each with 10 technical replicates)
except for Seahorse Analyzer experiments, which were performed with 3 biological
replicates (each with 5 technical replicates).
Extracellular Flux Analysis in Live Cells
OCRs were measured using the Seahorse XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer as described.[17] hGBM cells, and oncogenically transformed mouse NSCs were plated in XF24 cell
culture plates (Seahorse Bioscience) at 10^5 cells/well and incubated for 72 hours at
37°C with 5% CO2. One row of cells contained 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS). On the day of experimentation, each well was replaced with bicarbonate-free
low-buffered medium (Seahorse Bioscience) with the following: no supplement, 5 mM
glucose, 2 mM L-glutamine, or 1% FBS. Cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C
with 0% CO2. Each time point included 5 minutes of rest, 1 minute of
mixing, and 3 minutes of measuring. OCR measurements were normalized to cell counts
and then compared using 2-tailed t tests in Excel. A similar
protocol was used to evaluate cellular responses to 5 mM glucose and 5 mM
2-deoxyglucose (2-DG).
Analysis of Cellular Proliferation and Viability
To quantify the fractions of actively cycling cells in the population, we employed 2
methods: immunocytochemical labeling of KI67 and FACS-based mitotic profiling. For
KI67 labeling, 13 mm glass coverslips were placed in 24-well plates and coated with
10 µg/mL laminin in Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (dPBS) for 2
hours at 37°C. hGBM cells were plated at a density of 10 000 cells per well on
coated glass coverslips for 24 hours in growth medium. Cells were then treated with
10 µL of dPBS, 5 mM etomoxir, or 5 mM linoleic acid for a final concentration
of 100 µM etomoxir (Sigma E1905) and 100 µM linoleic acid (Sigma
L1376). Twenty-four hours after treatment, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde.
Coverslips with attached cells were subjected to immunohistochemical staining as
described above. In a separate experiment, TdT+ apoptotic cells were
quantified using an enzymatic detection kit as directed (Chemicon S7160).To perform mitotic profiling, hGBM cells were treated with
dPBS, etomoxir, or linoleic acid. Twenty-four hours after treatment, cells were
labelled with 2 µg/mL Hoechst in permeabilization solution and then subjected
to FACS using LSRII equipment and ModFit software for mitotic profile analysis. For
each experimental assay, each of 3 biological replicates was plated in triplicate for
each treatment group. Groups were compared using 2-tailed t tests in
Excel.
Inhibition of Fatty Acid Oxidation in Vivo
To assess the efficacy of inhibiting fatty acid oxidation in slowing tumor growth in
vivo, we performed a blinded, placebo-controlled preclinical study in a mouse model
of malignant glioma. All work on animals was performed in line with Home Office
licensing. NSCs isolated from the adult mouse brain were oncogenically transformed in
vitro (as described above) and then transplanted into the brain tissue of wild-type
mice of the same genetic background (a syngeneic model). A total of 10^4 cells in 1
microliter were injected across 2 sites within striatum: AP + 1.0, ML
−1.5, DV −3.5, and DV −3.0. Fourteen days after intracranial
cell implantation, osmotic pumps were implanted subcutaneously. Pumps were loaded
with either saline alone or 50 mg/mL etomoxir sodium-salt (Sigma E1905) in saline to
achieve approximately 10 mg/kg of drug treatment per day. Once euthanasia criteria
were reached, animals were transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. Survival
curves were compared between treatment groups using ANOVA in Prism.Tissues were sectioned into 16 μm-thick slices for
staining procedures. Tissues from all 26 animals were assessed by hemotoxylin &
eosin (H&E) to confirm the presence of tumor, using an Olympus microscope with
attached camera. For protein expression analysis (n = 9
animals per treatment group), immunohistochemistry was performed as described above.
Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Apoptome microscope with attached
camera and Axiovision software. Protein expression levels were compared between
groups using 2-tailed t tests in Excel.For MRI, mice were anesthetized by isoflurane/oxygen inhalation and imaged using the
Rapid 33 mm volume coil with SA Instruments’ physiological monitoring system
to maintain temperature and measure respiration. Parameters for the gradient echo
multislice scan (GEMS) were: repetition time (TR) 500 ms, effective echo time (TE)
5.54 ms, matrix 256 × 256, field of view 20 × 20 mm, flip angle
20°, and slice thickness 1 mm, giving a T1 weighted sequence. The software
Vnmr J (Varian/Agilent) Version 3.1A was used to calculate tumor volumes. One animal
from each group was scanned.
Results
Expression of Fatty Acid Oxidation Enzymes in Human Glioma Tissues
We evaluated expression of enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation in 28 samples of
fixed human glioblastoma tissue (Fig. 1).
Acyl-CoA dehydrogenases such as medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD), which
catalyzes the first oxidation step of fatty acids in the catabolic pathway, were
observed in a fraction of cells in all tumor samples studied with variability between
individuals (Figs 1
A–C
and 2
W). Carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1a (CPT1a),
which transports fatty acids across the mitochondrial membrane to be oxidized, and
the trifunctional protein hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA
thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase (HADHA), which catalyzes the final 3 steps in
beta-oxidation, were also observed in all tumors (Fig.
1
D and E). A
schematic showing each of the enzymes in this biochemical pathway is provided
(Supplementary material, Fig. S1). Expression of enzymes in this
pathway is not correlated with age or radiotherapy treatment (Supplementary material, Figs S2 and S3). Expression of the 3
acyl-CoA-dehydrogenase enzymes is correlated within individual glioblastomas, and
MCAD expression is negatively correlated with tumor cell density (Supplementary material, Fig. S4).
Fig. 1
Human glioblastomas express enzymes required for fatty
acid oxidation Representative photomicrographs demonstrate staining in human
glioblastoma tissue for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD, A),
short-chain hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (SCHAD, B), very-long-chain acyl-CoA
dehydrogenase (VLCAD, C), carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1a (CPT1a, D), and
the trifunctional protein hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA
thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase (HADHA, E). The majority of mitochondria labeled
with the pan-mitochondrial marker succinate dehydrogenase (SDHA) are co-labeled
with HADHA (F-J). A fraction of cells in human glioblastoma tissue identified
with Hoechst (K,O,S) and expressing MCAD (L,P,T) co-label with the astroglial
marker GFAP (M), the neural progenitor marker SOX2 (Q), and the glial
progenitor marker OLIG2 (U). Representative abeled cells are shown in merged
images (N,R,V). The fraction of cells expressing each of the fatty acid
oxidation enzymes is shown (W), as well as the fraction of total cells (X) and
MCAD+ cells (Y) co-labeled with each cell type. Scale bars are 10
µm.
Fig. 2
Fatty acid oxidation is a primary contributor to aerobic
respiration in primary-cultured hGBMs. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of
primary-cultured serum-free hGBM cells was assessed using the Seahorse Analyzer
(A). Baseline measurements were taken for cells in plain medium (empty
circles), with glutamine (black triangles), with glucose (black squares), and
exposed to 10% FBS for 72 hours prior to the experiment (grey diamonds). Cells
were then treated with 100 µM linoleic acid (a polyunsaturated fatty
acid), 100 µM etomoxir (an inhibitor of beta-oxidation), 2.0 µM
FCCP (which induces maximal respiration), and 2.5 µM antimycin A (which
inhibits aerobic respiration). Spare respiratory capacity, calculated by
dividing basal OCR by maximal OCR, is shown (B). Cellular response to linoleic
acid (light grey bars) and etomoxir (dark grey bars) is shown (C). The fraction
of mitochondrial respiration dependent on fatty acids is shown (D). A similar
experiment was conducted to evaluate responses to glucose and the glycolytic
inhibitor 2-DG (E). Cellular responses are summarized (F), and the fraction of
mitochondrial respiration dependent on glucose oxidation or glycolysis is shown
(G). *indicates significant change in respiration, P <
.05.
Human glioblastomas express enzymes required for fatty
acid oxidation Representative photomicrographs demonstrate staining in human
glioblastoma tissue for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD, A),
short-chain hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (SCHAD, B), very-long-chain acyl-CoA
dehydrogenase (VLCAD, C), carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1a (CPT1a, D), and
the trifunctional protein hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA
thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase (HADHA, E). The majority of mitochondria labeled
with the pan-mitochondrial marker succinate dehydrogenase (SDHA) are co-labeled
with HADHA (F-J). A fraction of cells in human glioblastoma tissue identified
with Hoechst (K,O,S) and expressing MCAD (L,P,T) co-label with the astroglial
marker GFAP (M), the neural progenitor marker SOX2 (Q), and the glial
progenitor marker OLIG2 (U). Representative abeled cells are shown in merged
images (N,R,V). The fraction of cells expressing each of the fatty acid
oxidation enzymes is shown (W), as well as the fraction of total cells (X) and
MCAD+ cells (Y) co-labeled with each cell type. Scale bars are 10
µm.Fatty acid oxidation is a primary contributor to aerobic
respiration in primary-cultured hGBMs. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of
primary-cultured serum-free hGBM cells was assessed using the Seahorse Analyzer
(A). Baseline measurements were taken for cells in plain medium (empty
circles), with glutamine (black triangles), with glucose (black squares), and
exposed to 10% FBS for 72 hours prior to the experiment (grey diamonds). Cells
were then treated with 100 µM linoleic acid (a polyunsaturated fatty
acid), 100 µM etomoxir (an inhibitor of beta-oxidation), 2.0 µM
FCCP (which induces maximal respiration), and 2.5 µM antimycin A (which
inhibits aerobic respiration). Spare respiratory capacity, calculated by
dividing basal OCR by maximal OCR, is shown (B). Cellular response to linoleic
acid (light grey bars) and etomoxir (dark grey bars) is shown (C). The fraction
of mitochondrial respiration dependent on fatty acids is shown (D). A similar
experiment was conducted to evaluate responses to glucose and the glycolytic
inhibitor 2-DG (E). Cellular responses are summarized (F), and the fraction of
mitochondrial respiration dependent on glucose oxidation or glycolysis is shown
(G). *indicates significant change in respiration, P <
.05.The enzymes appear to be localized to the mitochondria. Nearly all cells expressing
the pan-mitochondrial marker succinate dehydrogenase (SDHA) express the fatty acid
oxidation enzyme HADHA; these markers show strong co-labeling (Fig. 1
F–J). Mitochondria occasionally appeared not as puncta but as chains throughout
the cytoplasm, as has been reported in other proliferative cell types.[18]To identify the cell types within human glioblastoma tissue that are engaging in
fatty acid oxidation, we colabeled the enzyme MCAD with cell type-specific
antibodies, including the astroglial marker GFAP, the neural progenitor marker SOX2,
and the glial progenitor marker OLIG2 (Fig. 1
K–V). MCAD is expressed in OLIG2+ cells to a greater extent than
GFAP+ or SOX2+ (Fig. 1
X and Y),
although this enzyme is present in multiple cell types within human glioblastoma
tissue.
Differential Gene Expression and Survival Time in Human Glioma Patients
We next performed statistical analysis of glioma patient survival on the basis of
gene expression.[13,14] Kaplan-Meier survival plots were produced to compare survival among
genetically defined glioma patients (Supplementary material, Fig. S5), particularly focusing on genes
encoding fatty acid oxidation enzymes. We found that upregulation of 4 genes (of 9
total) in this metabolic pathway was associated with significantly worse survival in
patients with low-grade astrocytoma (in both the REMBRANDT and TCGA databases). No
significant differences in survival time for GBM patients were observed in either
database.
Metabolic Fuel Requirements of Primary-Cultured Human Glioma Cells
To determine whether fatty acid oxidation enzymes expressed in brain tumor tissues
are functional, further analysis was performed on primary-cultured hGBMs expanded
under serum-free conditions.[12] All experiments contained averaged data from 3 cultures: G144, G166, and
GliNS2. The OCRs of these precharacterized cells were measured using the Seahorse
Extracellular Flux Analyser.[17] Cells were treated first with linoleic acid, a polyunsaturated fatty acid,
then with etomoxir, an inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyl transferase I (the
rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid oxidation). The addition of linoleic acid
stimulates OCR in hGBMs even in the presence of glucose or glutamine (Fig. 2
A–D). Cells also decrease OCRs in response to etomoxir, although this response
is blunted in cells exposed to serum for 3 days (Fig.
2
C and D). A
similar experiment was conducted on mouse glioma-initiating cells (NSCs). NSCs were
isolated from normal adult wild-type mice and primary-cultured under serum-free
conditions in vitro and then transformed oncogenically by introduction of several
clinically relevant genetic lesions to reproduce the molecular and phenotypic
characteristics of glioma. In these cells, linoleic acid significantly increased OCR;
etomoxir had no effect in this experiment, either because cells switched to using
glucose or because the mitochondria had already acquired sufficient fatty acids to
supply the fatty acid oxidation pathway (Supplementary material, Fig. S6A–D).The response of primary-cultured hGBMs to glucose and the glycolytic inhibitor
2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) was also tested using the Seahorse Analyzer. 2-DG significantly
decreases OCR in non-serum-exposed cells, suggesting that glucose or its derivatives
are otherwise being oxidized (Fig. 2
E–G). Meanwhile, glucose treatment significantly decreased OCR in serum-exposed
cells, indicating a preference for anaerobic respiration when substrates are
available (Fig. 2
E–G). A similar experiment was conducted on the mouse glioma-initiating cells
(Supplementary material, Fig. S6E–G). Without serum exposure,
these cells did not respond to either glucose or 2-DG. After serum exposure, however,
these cells increased OCR in response to 2-DG.
The Role of Fatty Acid Oxidation in the Proliferation of Human Glioma
Cells
To test whether fatty acid oxidation plays a role in cellular survival and
proliferation, serum-free primary-cultured hGBMs were subjected to analysis after
treatment with vehicle control, 100 µM etomoxir sodium salt, or 100 µM
linoleic acid (Fig. 3
A–M). Etomoxir decreased KI67+ index, total cell count, and the fraction
of cells in S+G2/M phase of the cell cycle, suggesting that this
energy-producing biochemical pathway is important for the proliferation of human
glioma cells. Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation with etomoxir also reduces
proliferation and viability of mouse glioma-initiating cells (Supplementary material, Fig. S7).
Fig. 3
Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation decreases
proliferation in hGBMs but does not affect cellular survival. Sample
photomicrographs of cells treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (A, D),
100 µM etomoxir (B, E), or 100 µM linoleic acid (C, F) are shown,
stained with either TdT, a marker of apoptosis (A–C), or KI67, an
S-phase cell cycle marker (D–F). Separate channels are shown to display
Hoechst, a pan-nuclear marker ('), and TdT or KI67 (''). The
fraction of TdT+ apoptotic cells did not change significantly in either
treatment group (P > .05, G). The fraction of KI67+
proliferating cells decreased upon 24 hours treatment with etomoxir
(P < .05, H) and increased upon 24 hours of treatment
with linoleic acid (P < .01, H). The total cell count after
24 hours was significantly decreased in the presence of etomoxir
(P < .01, I) but was unaffected in the presence of
linoleic acid (P > .05, I). Shown are representative data
from fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based analysis of the mitotic index of
primary-cultured serum-free hGBM cells, performed after treatment with PBS (J),
100 µM etomoxir (K), or 100 µM linoleic acid (L). The fraction of
cells in S + G2/M phase of the cell cycle decreased by 20% from control
levels upon treatment with 100 µM etomoxir (P < .01,
M); this fraction was unaffected by treatment with linoleic acid
(P > .05, M).
Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation decreases
proliferation in hGBMs but does not affect cellular survival. Sample
photomicrographs of cells treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (A, D),
100 µM etomoxir (B, E), or 100 µM linoleic acid (C, F) are shown,
stained with either TdT, a marker of apoptosis (A–C), or KI67, an
S-phase cell cycle marker (D–F). Separate channels are shown to display
Hoechst, a pan-nuclear marker ('), and TdT or KI67 (''). The
fraction of TdT+ apoptotic cells did not change significantly in either
treatment group (P > .05, G). The fraction of KI67+
proliferating cells decreased upon 24 hours treatment with etomoxir
(P < .05, H) and increased upon 24 hours of treatment
with linoleic acid (P < .01, H). The total cell count after
24 hours was significantly decreased in the presence of etomoxir
(P < .01, I) but was unaffected in the presence of
linoleic acid (P > .05, I). Shown are representative data
from fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based analysis of the mitotic index of
primary-cultured serum-free hGBM cells, performed after treatment with PBS (J),
100 µM etomoxir (K), or 100 µM linoleic acid (L). The fraction of
cells in S + G2/M phase of the cell cycle decreased by 20% from control
levels upon treatment with 100 µM etomoxir (P < .01,
M); this fraction was unaffected by treatment with linoleic acid
(P > .05, M).
Inhibiting Fatty Acid Oxidation in a Mouse Model of Malignant Glioma
To evaluate the efficacy of etomoxir in slowing tumor growth in vivo, we employed a
mouse model of malignant glioma. The oncogenically transformed mouse NSCs used in the
experiments described above were transplanted into immunocompetent wild-type mice of
the same genetic background (a syngeneic model). This process reliably forms a
high-grade glial tumor that reproduces the histological and clinical characteristics
of human glioma.A blinded, placebo-controlled preclinical study was conducted
to evaluate the efficacy of slowing glioma growth in vivo with etomoxir treatment.
Fourteen days after cell implantation, when animals had only small regions of
dysplasia, osmotic pumps were implanted to deliver drug or saline vehicle control for
30 days (Fig. 4
A). Animal weight and behavior were monitored
daily until euthanasia criteria were reached (Supplementary material, Fig. S8), whereupon animals were found to have
high-grade glial tumors. Mice in both treatment groups exhibited largely similar
clinical symptoms during the last week of life leading up to clinical endpoint (Fig. 4
B, Supplementary material, Fig. S9). However, mice treated with 10 mg/kg
etomoxir sodium salt survived significantly longer than their saline-treated cage
mates (Fig. 4
C, Supplementary material, Table S3).
Fig. 4
Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation by etomoxir prolongs survival time in a
syngeneic mouse model of malignant glioma. Fourteen days after surgical
implantation of glioma-initiating cells into the brains of wild-type adult
mice, osmotic pumps were subcutaneously implanted to deliver drug or control
substance for a period of 30 days in a blinded, placebo-controlled preclinical
study (A). Animals were monitored until euthanasia criteria were met. Weight
loss and other symptoms occurred primarily in the final 3 days of life (B) and
were similar between the control and treatment groups (8.0 g vs 7.5 g,
respectively, P > .05). Mice treated with 10 mg/kg etomoxir
sodium salt lived significantly longer than animals treated with vehicle
control (C, P < .001, ANOVA).
Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation by etomoxir prolongs survival time in a
syngeneic mouse model of malignant glioma. Fourteen days after surgical
implantation of glioma-initiating cells into the brains of wild-type adult
mice, osmotic pumps were subcutaneously implanted to deliver drug or control
substance for a period of 30 days in a blinded, placebo-controlled preclinical
study (A). Animals were monitored until euthanasia criteria were met. Weight
loss and other symptoms occurred primarily in the final 3 days of life (B) and
were similar between the control and treatment groups (8.0 g vs 7.5 g,
respectively, P > .05). Mice treated with 10 mg/kg etomoxir
sodium salt lived significantly longer than animals treated with vehicle
control (C, P < .001, ANOVA).Upon tissue collection, brains were photographed to evaluate tumor severity on a
macro scale; no differences in tumor size were observed between treatment groups at
clinical endpoint, a finding that was subsequently confirmed by histopathological
evaluation of H & E stained sections (Fig. 5
A–C). Sections from all animals were subjected to H & E staining procedures
to assess tumor infiltration patterns throughout the brain and were not significantly
different between treatment groups (Fig. 5
D–J). The postmortem tissues were evaluated by extrapolating criteria for human
intracranial tumor grading set out by the 2007 WHO guidelines. The tumors were
identified as high-grade anaplastic astrocytoma. Stereotypical reproduction of
histological features was observed between animals at clinical endpoint. Hemorrhage
was commonly observed in central regions of each tumor; examples of mitotic figures
and apoptotic nuclei were also observed throughout the tumors. Tumors infiltrated
tissues surrounding the striatal implantation site, including corpus collosum and
cortex; some of the brain tissues demonstrated invasion of tumor cells across midline
(Fig. 5
D–J). Mass effect was observed, analogous to tumor-related changes in human
glioblastoma. Sections were also stained to assess KI67+ proliferation index,
p53+ index, and GFAP+ glial content, none of which showed significant
differences between treatment groups (Fig. 5
K–S).
Fig. 5
No difference in tumor size, location, or phenotype was observed between
treatment groups at clinical endpoint. Brains from the mice in the study were
photographed to evaluate tumor severity. (A) No significant difference in tumor
volume or macro score was observed between treatment groups at clinical
endpoint (B–C), corresponding to similar tumor grading by histological
assessment (D). Infiltration of tumors from the injection site (striatum, E)
into corpus collosum (F), cortex (G), dorsal aspects of the brain (H), across
midline (I), or into hippocampus (J) were not found to be significantly
different between treatment groups (P > .05, chi-square
test). Tumors were further evaluated to quantify KI67+ proliferation
index (K, N), p53+ malignancy marker (L, O), and GFAP+ glial cell
content (M, P) in control-treated animals (K-M) and etomoxir-treated animals
(N–P). No difference in cellular phenotype was observed between groups
(P > .05, 2-tailed t test).
No difference in tumor size, location, or phenotype was observed between
treatment groups at clinical endpoint. Brains from the mice in the study were
photographed to evaluate tumor severity. (A) No significant difference in tumor
volume or macro score was observed between treatment groups at clinical
endpoint (B–C), corresponding to similar tumor grading by histological
assessment (D). Infiltration of tumors from the injection site (striatum, E)
into corpus collosum (F), cortex (G), dorsal aspects of the brain (H), across
midline (I), or into hippocampus (J) were not found to be significantly
different between treatment groups (P > .05, chi-square
test). Tumors were further evaluated to quantify KI67+ proliferation
index (K, N), p53+ malignancy marker (L, O), and GFAP+ glial cell
content (M, P) in control-treated animals (K-M) and etomoxir-treated animals
(N–P). No difference in cellular phenotype was observed between groups
(P > .05, 2-tailed t test).The animals showed similar-sized tumors at clinical endpoint since all were subjected
to the same euthanasia criteria. To evaluate tumor size over the entire experimental
time-course, one animal in each treatment group was subjected to MRI over the course
of the study (Fig. 6). The appearance of glioma
using T1-weighted diffusion tensor imaging (without contrast agent) corresponded to
the emergence of clinical symptoms (eg, weight loss) in both animals. Tumor growth
occured over the course of approximately 2 months in control animals (Fig. 6
A–F)
and slowed upon treatment with 10 mg/kg/day etomoxir (Fig. 6
G–L).
Fig. 6
Emergence and progression of glioma were delayed upon treatment with the
investigational drug etomoxir. Mouse 077 (control) and mouse 078 (etomoxir)
were subjected to MRI to track tumor progression during the study. Coronal
images throughout the brain are shown for Mouse 077 across the entire
experimental time-course (A-E). At 46 days post cell implantation (DPI), an
injection track was observed with no evidence of tumor (A). At 53 DPI, there
was no evidence of tumor and no clinical symptoms (B). At 67 DPI, a 1.0 mm
tumor was observed with no clinical symptoms (C). At 72 DPI, a 1.3 mm tumor was
observed with approximately 5% loss of body weight the following day (D). At 75
DPI, a 5 mm tumor was observed, with approximately 15% loss of body weight and
other symptoms signaling clinical endpoint (E). A zoom image of this time point
is shown (F). Tumor growth was slowed upon treatment with 10 mg/kg/day etomoxir
in mouse 078 (G-K). This animal first manifested tumor by MR at 95 DPI; at 97
DPI, this animal lost 15% body weight and reached clinical endpoint. A zoom
image of this animal's brain at 75 DPI is shown to compare with the
vehicle-treated animal at the same time point (L).
Emergence and progression of glioma were delayed upon treatment with the
investigational drug etomoxir. Mouse 077 (control) and mouse 078 (etomoxir)
were subjected to MRI to track tumor progression during the study. Coronal
images throughout the brain are shown for Mouse 077 across the entire
experimental time-course (A-E). At 46 days post cell implantation (DPI), an
injection track was observed with no evidence of tumor (A). At 53 DPI, there
was no evidence of tumor and no clinical symptoms (B). At 67 DPI, a 1.0 mm
tumor was observed with no clinical symptoms (C). At 72 DPI, a 1.3 mm tumor was
observed with approximately 5% loss of body weight the following day (D). At 75
DPI, a 5 mm tumor was observed, with approximately 15% loss of body weight and
other symptoms signaling clinical endpoint (E). A zoom image of this time point
is shown (F). Tumor growth was slowed upon treatment with 10 mg/kg/day etomoxir
in mouse 078 (G-K). This animal first manifested tumor by MR at 95 DPI; at 97
DPI, this animal lost 15% body weight and reached clinical endpoint. A zoom
image of this animal's brain at 75 DPI is shown to compare with the
vehicle-treated animal at the same time point (L).
Discussion
The acquisition of a glycolytic strategy is considered a hallmark of oncogenic potential
in the field of cancer biology.[19] Reliance upon this biochemical pathway may be expected for cells within gliomas
as they share morphological and phenotypic features with glial cells that are highly
glycolytic and release lactate into the extracellular space.[20] From a diagnostic imaging perspective, however, it was not evident that the
Warburg effect was regularly manifested in gliomas. Between 35 and 40 percent of
recurrent gliomas in human patients are not observed using imaging techniques based on
glucose uptake (eg, FDG-PET), although these tumors can be observed by contrast MRI.[21,22] Using NMR spectroscopy, Maher et al demonstrated that <50% of the acetyl-CoA
pool was derived from blood-borne glucose; these results support the notion that
additional substrates contribute to glioma bioenergetic flux.[4] Therefore, excess glucose utilization, as predicted by the Warburg effect, may
not be particularly characteristic of gliomas.A number of studies have investigated the catabolic strategies of
glioma cells, but technical difficulties have challenged efforts to accurately identify
the metabolic fuel preferences of this tumor type. For example, a high
lactate-to-pyruvate ratio has been identified in human glioma xenografts in rodents, a
finding that seems to support the glycolytic nature of glioma.[23] However, these results do not specifically establish that cells rely upon
glycolysis for energy metabolism but do demonstrate that ATP levels remain high despite
low hexokinase activity and high lactate secretion; one interpretation of this study
could be that alternative substrates are being oxidized. Other researchers have shown
that inhibition of glycolysis with dichloroacetate (DHA) decreases proliferation and
increases rates of apoptotic cell death in primary-cultured glioma cells;[24] however, this drug also decreases the activity of other metabolic pathways
including fatty acid oxidation.[25] Fatty acids have previously been shown to inhibit the growth of adult glioma
cells cultured in the presence of serum,[26] an effect thought to be mediated by changes in the redox state.[27] However, the established cell lines and tumor xenografts used for these
biochemical investigations have been exposed to serum, a common cell-culturing protocol
that has been shown to cause genetic and phenotypic alterations to human glioma samples.[12]In this study, we report that cells derived from human glioma and cultured under optimal
conditions express fatty acid oxidation enzymes and are dependent upon fatty acid
oxidation for aerobic respiration and proliferative activity. Figure 2 demonstrates that a majority of respiratory activity
arises from fatty acid oxidation, while a smaller subset of respiratory activity arises
from glucose oxidation. These findings are interesting in light of results in humans and
suggest that much of the acetyl-CoA produced by malignant gliomas arises from nonglucose sources.[28] Previous studies into the metabolic fate of 13C-glucose infused into human
patients have demonstrated some role for this substrate in glioma cell respiration.[29] However, radiolabeled fatty acids have not been infused for evaluation as a
possible alternative metabolic substrate. We predict that such experiments, conducted in
mouse models and human patients, will validate our findings by showing that fatty acids
are metabolic substrates supporting glioma bioenergetics in vivo.Our findings offer a novel target for the prognosis and treatment of malignant glioma.
We tested a specific inhibitor of fatty acid oxidation, etomoxir (sodium salt), in the
context of a blinded, placebo-controlled preclinical study design using a clinically
relevant mouse model of malignant glioma.[16] The promising results of etomoxir in slowing tumor growth and prolonging survival
in this mouse model provide initial evidence for pursuing new therapeutic avenues to
target fatty acid metabolism in the clinical treatment of astrocytomas.Etomoxir has already been tested in phase I/II clinical trials for treating moderate
congestive heart failure; this trial was discontinued because 4 patients (of 226 taking
the drug) developed unacceptably high liver transaminase levels upon treatment, and the
risk of such drastic side effects was deemed sufficient to negate the potential benefit
of this drug for these patients.[30] However, the treatment options and survival expectancy for patients with
malignant glioma is much more dire, and the potential benefit in regard to risk is very
different for patients with this diagnosis. This drug may therefore provide promise for
clinical therapies aimed to slow the growth and progression of malignant glioma.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material is available online at (http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/).
Funding
This research was supported by The Wellcome Trust Centre for
Mitochondrial Research [G906919], the Engineering & Physical Sciences Research
Council’s IDEAS Factory Sandpit [Newcastle Award, 2012], the
Wellcome Trust and Engineering &
Physical Sciences Research Council’s Innovative Engineering
for Health Project Award (CANDO), and the Newcastle University Faculty
of Medical Sciences Translational Research Fund.Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
Authors: Min Wu; Andy Neilson; Amy L Swift; Rebecca Moran; James Tamagnine; Diane Parslow; Suzanne Armistead; Kristie Lemire; Jim Orrell; Jay Teich; Steve Chomicz; David A Ferrick Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2006-09-13 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Sébastien Bonnet; Stephen L Archer; Joan Allalunis-Turner; Alois Haromy; Christian Beaulieu; Richard Thompson; Christopher T Lee; Gary D Lopaschuk; Lakshmi Puttagunta; Sandra Bonnet; Gwyneth Harry; Kyoko Hashimoto; Christopher J Porter; Miguel A Andrade; Bernard Thebaud; Evangelos D Michelakis Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Daniel J Brat; Roel G W Verhaak; Kenneth D Aldape; W K Alfred Yung; Sofie R Salama; Lee A D Cooper; Esther Rheinbay; C Ryan Miller; Mark Vitucci; Olena Morozova; A Gordon Robertson; Houtan Noushmehr; Peter W Laird; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Jason T Huse; Giovanni Ciriello; Laila M Poisson; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Mitchel S Berger; Cameron Brennan; Rivka R Colen; Howard Colman; Adam E Flanders; Caterina Giannini; Mia Grifford; Antonio Iavarone; Rajan Jain; Isaac Joseph; Jaegil Kim; Katayoon Kasaian; Tom Mikkelsen; Bradley A Murray; Brian Patrick O'Neill; Lior Pachter; Donald W Parsons; Carrie Sougnez; Erik P Sulman; Scott R Vandenberg; Erwin G Van Meir; Andreas von Deimling; Hailei Zhang; Daniel Crain; Kevin Lau; David Mallery; Scott Morris; Joseph Paulauskis; Robert Penny; Troy Shelton; Mark Sherman; Peggy Yena; Aaron Black; Jay Bowen; Katie Dicostanzo; Julie Gastier-Foster; Kristen M Leraas; Tara M Lichtenberg; Christopher R Pierson; Nilsa C Ramirez; Cynthia Taylor; Stephanie Weaver; Lisa Wise; Erik Zmuda; Tanja Davidsen; John A Demchok; Greg Eley; Martin L Ferguson; Carolyn M Hutter; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Bradley A Ozenberger; Margi Sheth; Heidi J Sofia; Roy Tarnuzzer; Zhining Wang; Liming Yang; Jean Claude Zenklusen; Brenda Ayala; Julien Baboud; Sudha Chudamani; Mark A Jensen; Jia Liu; Todd Pihl; Rohini Raman; Yunhu Wan; Ye Wu; Adrian Ally; J Todd Auman; Miruna Balasundaram; Saianand Balu; Stephen B Baylin; Rameen Beroukhim; Moiz S Bootwalla; Reanne Bowlby; Christopher A Bristow; Denise Brooks; Yaron Butterfield; Rebecca Carlsen; Scott Carter; Lynda Chin; Andy Chu; Eric Chuah; Kristian Cibulskis; Amanda Clarke; Simon G Coetzee; Noreen Dhalla; Tim Fennell; Sheila Fisher; Stacey Gabriel; Gad Getz; Richard Gibbs; Ranabir Guin; Angela Hadjipanayis; D Neil Hayes; Toshinori Hinoue; Katherine Hoadley; Robert A Holt; Alan P Hoyle; Stuart R Jefferys; Steven Jones; Corbin D Jones; Raju Kucherlapati; Phillip H Lai; Eric Lander; Semin Lee; Lee Lichtenstein; Yussanne Ma; Dennis T Maglinte; Harshad S Mahadeshwar; Marco A Marra; Michael Mayo; Shaowu Meng; Matthew L Meyerson; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Richard A Moore; Lisle E Mose; Andrew J Mungall; Angeliki Pantazi; Michael Parfenov; Peter J Park; Joel S Parker; Charles M Perou; Alexei Protopopov; Xiaojia Ren; Jeffrey Roach; Thaís S Sabedot; Jacqueline Schein; Steven E Schumacher; Jonathan G Seidman; Sahil Seth; Hui Shen; Janae V Simons; Payal Sipahimalani; Matthew G Soloway; Xingzhi Song; Huandong Sun; Barbara Tabak; Angela Tam; Donghui Tan; Jiabin Tang; Nina Thiessen; Timothy Triche; David J Van Den Berg; Umadevi Veluvolu; Scot Waring; Daniel J Weisenberger; Matthew D Wilkerson; Tina Wong; Junyuan Wu; Liu Xi; Andrew W Xu; Lixing Yang; Travis I Zack; Jianhua Zhang; B Arman Aksoy; Harindra Arachchi; Chris Benz; Brady Bernard; Daniel Carlin; Juok Cho; Daniel DiCara; Scott Frazer; Gregory N Fuller; JianJiong Gao; Nils Gehlenborg; David Haussler; David I Heiman; Lisa Iype; Anders Jacobsen; Zhenlin Ju; Sol Katzman; Hoon Kim; Theo Knijnenburg; Richard Bailey Kreisberg; Michael S Lawrence; William Lee; Kalle Leinonen; Pei Lin; Shiyun Ling; Wenbin Liu; Yingchun Liu; Yuexin Liu; Yiling Lu; Gordon Mills; Sam Ng; Michael S Noble; Evan Paull; Arvind Rao; Sheila Reynolds; Gordon Saksena; Zack Sanborn; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz; Yasin Senbabaoglu; Ronglai Shen; Ilya Shmulevich; Rileen Sinha; Josh Stuart; S Onur Sumer; Yichao Sun; Natalie Tasman; Barry S Taylor; Doug Voet; Nils Weinhold; John N Weinstein; Da Yang; Kosuke Yoshihara; Siyuan Zheng; Wei Zhang; Lihua Zou; Ty Abel; Sara Sadeghi; Mark L Cohen; Jenny Eschbacher; Eyas M Hattab; Aditya Raghunathan; Matthew J Schniederjan; Dina Aziz; Gene Barnett; Wendi Barrett; Darell D Bigner; Lori Boice; Cathy Brewer; Chiara Calatozzolo; Benito Campos; Carlos Gilberto Carlotti; Timothy A Chan; Lucia Cuppini; Erin Curley; Stefania Cuzzubbo; Karen Devine; Francesco DiMeco; Rebecca Duell; J Bradley Elder; Ashley Fehrenbach; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; Jordonna Fulop; Johanna Gardner; Beth Hermes; Christel Herold-Mende; Christine Jungk; Ady Kendler; Norman L Lehman; Eric Lipp; Ouida Liu; Randy Mandt; Mary McGraw; Roger Mclendon; Christopher McPherson; Luciano Neder; Phuong Nguyen; Ardene Noss; Raffaele Nunziata; Quinn T Ostrom; Cheryl Palmer; Alessandro Perin; Bianca Pollo; Alexander Potapov; Olga Potapova; W Kimryn Rathmell; Daniil Rotin; Lisa Scarpace; Cathy Schilero; Kelly Senecal; Kristen Shimmel; Vsevolod Shurkhay; Suzanne Sifri; Rosy Singh; Andrew E Sloan; Kathy Smolenski; Susan M Staugaitis; Ruth Steele; Leigh Thorne; Daniela P C Tirapelli; Andreas Unterberg; Mahitha Vallurupalli; Yun Wang; Ronald Warnick; Felicia Williams; Yingli Wolinsky; Sue Bell; Mara Rosenberg; Chip Stewart; Franklin Huang; Jonna L Grimsby; Amie J Radenbaugh; Jianan Zhang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven M Pollard; Koichi Yoshikawa; Ian D Clarke; Davide Danovi; Stefan Stricker; Roslin Russell; Jane Bayani; Renee Head; Marco Lee; Mark Bernstein; Jeremy A Squire; Austin Smith; Peter Dirks Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Elizabeth C Randall; Begoña G C Lopez; Sen Peng; Michael S Regan; Walid M Abdelmoula; Sankha S Basu; Sandro Santagata; Haejin Yoon; Marcia C Haigis; Jeffrey N Agar; Nhan L Tran; William F Elmquist; Forest M White; Jann N Sarkaria; Nathalie Y R Agar Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lisa M Butler; Ylenia Perone; Jonas Dehairs; Leslie E Lupien; Vincent de Laat; Ali Talebi; Massimo Loda; William B Kinlaw; Johannes V Swinnen Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Ines Bruns; Benedikt Sauer; Michael C Burger; Jule Eriksson; Ute Hofmann; Yannick Braun; Patrick N Harter; Anna-Luisa Luger; Michael W Ronellenfitsch; Joachim P Steinbach; Johannes Rieger Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Heather J Wright; Jue Hou; Binzhi Xu; Marvin Cortez; Eric O Potma; Bruce J Tromberg; Olga V Razorenova Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 11.205