Literature DB >> 27365080

Axillary evaluation and lymphedema in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Ellie J Coromilas1, Jason D Wright1,2, Yongmei Huang1, Sheldon Feldman1, Alfred I Neugut1,2, Grace Clarke Hillyer2, Ling Chen1, Dawn L Hershman3,4.   

Abstract

Axillary evaluation in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is increasing; however, this may introduce additional morbidity with unclear benefit. Our objective was to examine the morbidity and mortality associated with axillary evaluation in DCIS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 10,504 women aged 65-90 years with DCIS who underwent breast conserving surgery between 2002 and 2012 using SEER-Medicare database. Patients were categorized by receipt of axillary evaluation with either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary node dissection (ALND). We determined the incidence of lymphedema treatment as defined by diagnostic and procedural codes, as well as 10-year breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. 18.3 % of those treated with BCS and 69.4 % of those treated with mastectomy had an axillary evaluation. One year after treatment, 8.2 % of women who had an axillary evaluation developed lymphedema, compared to 5.9 % of those who did not. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, the incidence of lymphedema was higher among those who underwent axillary evaluation (HR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04-1.45). Overall 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was similar between both groups (HR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.40-1.74). Only 44 (0.40 %) women died of breast cancer; receipt of axillary evaluation did not alter overall survival. Axillary evaluation is commonly performed in women with DCIS, especially those undergoing mastectomy. However, women who receive an axillary evaluation have higher rates of lymphedema, without breast cancer-specific or overall survival benefit. Efforts should be made to determine the population of women with DCIS who benefit from this procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary evaluation; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Lymphedema

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27365080     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3890-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

1.  Predictors of increased risk for early treatment non-adherence to oral anti-estrogen therapies in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Miryam Yusufov; Margo Nathan; Aleta Wiley; Julia Russell; Ann Partridge; Hadine Joffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Trends and clinicopathological predictors of axillary evaluation in ductal carcinoma in situ patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Nai-Si Huang; Jing Si; Ben-Long Yang; Chen-Lian Quan; Jia-Jian Chen; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Retrospective observational study about reducing the false negative rate of the sentinel lymph node biopsy: Never underestimate the effect of subjective factors.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Zhou; Zheng-Gui Du; Di Zhang; Qing Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Factors that affect the false negative rate of sentinel lymph node mapping with methylene blue dye alone in breast cancer.

Authors:  Huang Li; Zhang Jun; Ge Zhi-Cheng; Qu Xiang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; April Zambelli-Weiner; Nicole Delgado; Ashley Sier; Robert Bauserman; Jerrod Nelms
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.