BACKGROUND: The introduction of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) represents a crucial step in the polio eradication endgame. This trial examined the safety and immunogenicity of IPV given alongside the measles-rubella and yellow fever vaccines at 9 months and when given as a full or fractional dose using needle and syringe or disposable-syringe jet injector. METHODS: We did a phase 4, randomised, non-inferiority trial at three periurban government clinics in west Gambia. Infants aged 9-10 months who had already received oral poliovirus vaccine were randomly assigned to receive the IPV, measles-rubella, and yellow fever vaccines, singularly or in combination. Separately, IPV was given as a full intramuscular or fractional intradermal dose by needle and syringe or disposable-syringe jet injector at a second visit. The primary outcomes were seroprevalence rates for poliovirus 4-6 weeks post-vaccination and the rate of seroconversion between baseline and post-vaccination serum samples for measles, rubella, and yellow fever; and the post-vaccination antibody titres generated against each component of the vaccines. We did a per-protocol analysis with a non-inferiority margin of 10% for poliovirus seroprevalence and measles, rubella, and yellow fever seroconversion, and (1/3) log2 for log2-transformed antibody titres. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01847872. FINDINGS: Between July 10, 2013, and May 8, 2014, we assessed 1662 infants for eligibility, of whom 1504 were enrolled into one of seven groups for vaccine interference and one of four groups for fractional dosing and alternative route of administration. The rubella and yellow fever antibody titres were reduced by co-administration but the seroconversion rates achieved non-inferiority in both cases (rubella, -4·5% [95% CI -9·5 to -0·1]; yellow fever, 1·2% [-2·9 to 5·5]). Measles and poliovirus responses were unaffected (measles, 6·8% [95% CI -1·4 to 14·9]; poliovirus serotype 1, 1·6% [-6·7 to 4·7]; serotype 2, 0·0% [-2·1 to 2·1]; serotype 3, 0·0% [-3·8 to 3·9]). Poliovirus seroprevalence was universally high (>97%) after vaccination, but the antibody titres generated by fractional intradermal doses of IPV did not achieve non-inferiority compared with full dose. The number of infants who seroconverted or had a four-fold rise in titres was also lower by the intradermal route. There were no safety concerns. INTERPRETATION: The data support the future co-administration of IPV, measles-rubella, and yellow fever vaccines within the Expanded Programme on Immunization schedule at 9 months. The administration of single fractional intradermal doses of IPV by needle and syringe or disposable-syringe jet injector compromises the immunity generated, although it results in a high post-vaccination poliovirus seroprevalence. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) represents a crucial step in the polio eradication endgame. This trial examined the safety and immunogenicity of IPV given alongside the measles-rubella and yellow fever vaccines at 9 months and when given as a full or fractional dose using needle and syringe or disposable-syringe jet injector. METHODS: We did a phase 4, randomised, non-inferiority trial at three periurban government clinics in west Gambia. Infants aged 9-10 months who had already received oral poliovirus vaccine were randomly assigned to receive the IPV, measles-rubella, and yellow fever vaccines, singularly or in combination. Separately, IPV was given as a full intramuscular or fractional intradermal dose by needle and syringe or disposable-syringe jet injector at a second visit. The primary outcomes were seroprevalence rates for poliovirus 4-6 weeks post-vaccination and the rate of seroconversion between baseline and post-vaccination serum samples for measles, rubella, and yellow fever; and the post-vaccination antibody titres generated against each component of the vaccines. We did a per-protocol analysis with a non-inferiority margin of 10% for poliovirus seroprevalence and measles, rubella, and yellow fever seroconversion, and (1/3) log2 for log2-transformed antibody titres. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01847872. FINDINGS: Between July 10, 2013, and May 8, 2014, we assessed 1662 infants for eligibility, of whom 1504 were enrolled into one of seven groups for vaccine interference and one of four groups for fractional dosing and alternative route of administration. The rubella and yellow fever antibody titres were reduced by co-administration but the seroconversion rates achieved non-inferiority in both cases (rubella, -4·5% [95% CI -9·5 to -0·1]; yellow fever, 1·2% [-2·9 to 5·5]). Measles and poliovirus responses were unaffected (measles, 6·8% [95% CI -1·4 to 14·9]; poliovirus serotype 1, 1·6% [-6·7 to 4·7]; serotype 2, 0·0% [-2·1 to 2·1]; serotype 3, 0·0% [-3·8 to 3·9]). Poliovirus seroprevalence was universally high (>97%) after vaccination, but the antibody titres generated by fractional intradermal doses of IPV did not achieve non-inferiority compared with full dose. The number of infants who seroconverted or had a four-fold rise in titres was also lower by the intradermal route. There were no safety concerns. INTERPRETATION: The data support the future co-administration of IPV, measles-rubella, and yellow fever vaccines within the Expanded Programme on Immunization schedule at 9 months. The administration of single fractional intradermal doses of IPV by needle and syringe or disposable-syringe jet injector compromises the immunity generated, although it results in a high post-vaccination poliovirus seroprevalence. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Authors: Davide Angeletti; Ivan Kosik; Jefferson J S Santos; William T Yewdell; Carolyn M Boudreau; Vamsee V A Mallajosyula; Madeleine C Mankowski; Michael Chambers; Madhu Prabhakaran; Heather D Hickman; Adrian B McDermott; Galit Alter; Jayanta Chaudhuri; Jonathan W Yewdell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Cynthia J Snider; Khalequ Zaman; Concepcion F Estivariz; Mohammad Yunus; William C Weldon; Kathleen A Wannemuehler; M Steven Oberste; Mark A Pallansch; Steven Gf Wassilak; Tajul Islam A Bari; Abhijeet Anand Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ikechukwu Adigweme; Edem Akpalu; Mohammed Yisa; Simon Donkor; Lamin B Jarju; Baba Danso; Anthony Mendy; David Jeffries; Abdoulie Njie; Andrew Bruce; Michael Royals; James L Goodson; Mark R Prausnitz; Devin McAllister; Paul A Rota; Sebastien Henry; Ed Clarke Journal: Trials Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Madina Rasulova; Thomas Vercruysse; Jasmine Paulissen; Catherina Coun; Vanessa Suin; Leo Heyndrickx; Ji Ma; Katrien Geerts; Jolien Timmermans; Niraj Mishra; Li-Hsin Li; Dieudonné Buh Kum; Lotte Coelmont; Steven Van Gucht; Hadi Karimzadeh; Julia Thorn-Seshold; Simon Rothenfußer; Kevin K Ariën; Johan Neyts; Kai Dallmeier; Hendrik Jan Thibaut Journal: Microbiol Spectr Date: 2022-06-07
Authors: Grant A Mackenzie; Isaac Osei; Rasheed Salaudeen; Ousman Secka; Umberto D'Alessandro; Ed Clarke; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit; Paul V Licciardi; Cattram Nguyen; Brian Greenwood; Kim Mulholland Journal: Trials Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: David A Muller; Germain J P Fernando; Nick S Owens; Christiana Agyei-Yeboah; Jonathan C J Wei; Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Angus Forster; Paul Fahey; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Paul R Young; Mark A F Kendall Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ali Faisal Saleem; Ondrej Mach; Mohammad Tahir Yousafzai; Zaubina Kazi; Attaullah Baig; Muhammad Sajid; Vishali Jeyaseelan; Roland W Sutter; Anita K M Zaidi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 5.226