| Literature DB >> 27364037 |
Matias Acosta1, Ljubomira A Schmitt1, Claudio Cazorla2, Andrew Studer3, Alexander Zintler1, Julia Glaum2,4, Hans-Joachim Kleebe1, Wolfgang Donner1, Mark Hoffman2, Jürgen Rödel1, Manuel Hinterstein2,5.
Abstract
Coupling of order parameters provides a means to tune functionality in advanced materials including multiferroics, superconductors, and ionic conductors. We demonstrate that the response of a frustrated ferroelectric state leads to coupling between order parameters under electric field depending on grain orientation. The strain of grains oriented along a specific crystallographic direction, 〈h00〉, is caused by converse piezoelectricity originating from a ferrodistortive tetragonal phase. For 〈hhh〉 oriented grains, the strain results from converse piezoelectricity and rotostriction, as indicated by an antiferrodistortive instability that promotes octahedral tilting in a rhombohedral phase. Both strain mechanisms combined lead to a colossal local strain of (2.4 ± 0.1) % and indicate coupling between oxygen octahedral tilting and polarization, here termed "rotopolarization". These findings were confirmed with electromechanical experiments, in situ neutron diffraction, and in situ transmission electron microscopy in 0.75Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3-0.25SrTiO3. This work demonstrates that polar and non-polar instabilities can cooperate to provide colossal functional responses.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27364037 PMCID: PMC4929446 DOI: 10.1038/srep28742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Thermodynamic variables electric field E and stress σ are conjugated to the order parameters polarization P and strain ε, respectively.
Coupling between the order parameters polarization P and strain ε is termed piezoelectricity/electrostriction (1), between strain ε and oxygen ochtaedral tilts ϕ is termed rotostriction (2), and between polarization P and oxygen ochtaedral tilts ϕ is termed in this work as rotopolarization (3).
Figure 2Macroscopic strain mechanisms.
(a) Strain as a function of time for pulses of 10 s duration and electric fields ranging between 1.5 kV/mm and 4 kV/mm. Inset of (a) displays the strain decay after electric field removal. (b) remanent state at 0 kV/mm and (c) applied electric field state at 3 kV/mm contour plots of in situ neutron diffraction patterns for sample orientations in the ω range between −57° and 108°. The presented 2θ angular range of interest corresponds to the ½ 311, 111, and 200 reflections. The white lines superimposed indicate the patterns at ω = θ and ω = θ −90° which fulfil the condition of k∥E and k⊥E, respectively. The red arrow indicates the maximum intensity of the ½ 311 reflection. (d,e) visualize the two ideal cases of grains with 〈h00〉 and 〈hhh〉 oriented along the electric field. The strain of the material under electric field is given by S. Pseudocubic grains in the virgin state (grey) transform to either tetragonal (red) or rhombohedral (blue) symmetry due to FE or AFD instabilities.
Figure 3Strain quantification via TEM.
TEM bright field images of a grain viewed along pseudocubic <111> zone axis in (a) initial state with presence of core (marked with red arrow) and shell and (b) at −4 kV/mm. (c) image subtraction between the grain at 0 kV/mm and −4 kV/mm. In the merged image an elongation of the grain is visible along the upper part of the figure, as indicated. (d) local strain quantification with a mean strain value of (2.4 ± 0.1) %.