Literature DB >> 27363834

Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve Assessed by Gated SPECT with Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Detectors Using 99mTc-Tetrofosmin: Head-to-Head Comparison with 13N-Ammonia PET.

Rene Nkoulou1, Tobias A Fuchs1, Aju P Pazhenkottil1, Silke M Kuest1, Jelena R Ghadri1, Julia Stehli1, Michael Fiechter1, Bernhard A Herzog1, Oliver Gaemperli1, Ronny R Buechel1, Philipp A Kaufmann2.   

Abstract

Recent advances in SPECT technology including cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) semiconductor detector material may pave the way for absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements by SPECT. The aim of the present study was to compare K1 uptake rate constants as surrogates of absolute MBF and myocardial flow reserve index (MFRi) in humans as assessed with a CZT SPECT camera versus PET.
METHODS: Absolute MBF was assessed in 28 consecutive patients undergoing adenosine stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by 99mTc-tetrofosmin CZT SPECT and 13N-ammonia PET, and MFR was calculated as a ratio of hyperemic over resting MBF. Results from both MPI methods were compared, and correlation coefficients were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy of CZT MFRi to predict an abnormal MFR defined as PET MFR less than 2 was assessed using a receiver-operator-characteristic curve.
RESULTS: Median MBF at rest was comparable between CZT and PET (0.89 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.77-1.00] vs. 0.92 [IQR, 0.78-1.06] mL/g/min; P = not significant) whereas it was significantly lower at stress in CZT than PET (1.11 [IQR, 1.00-1.26] vs. 2.06 [IQR, 1.48-2.56] mL/g/min; P < 0.001). This resulted in median MFRi values of 1.32 (IQR, 1.13-1.52) by CZT and 2.36 (IQR, 1.57-2.71) by PET (P < 0.001). The receiver-operator-characteristic curve revealed a cutoff for CZT MFRi at 1.26 to predict an abnormal PET MFR yielding an accuracy of 75%.
CONCLUSION: The estimation of absolute MBF index values by CZT SPECT MPI with 99mTc-tetrofosmin is technically feasible, although hyperemic values are significantly lower than from PET with 13N-ammonia, resulting in a substantial underestimation of MFR. Nevertheless, CZT MFRi may confer diagnostic value.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  13N-ammonia PET; cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) SPECT; myocardial blood flow (MBF); myocardial flow reserve (MFR)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27363834     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  33 in total

1.  A combined static-dynamic single-dose imaging protocol to compare quantitative dynamic SPECT with static conventional SPECT.

Authors:  Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Feasibility of dynamic stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sangwon Han; Young-Hak Kim; Jung-Min Ahn; Soo-Jin Kang; Jungsu S Oh; Eonwoo Shin; Changhwan Sung; Sun Young Chae; Seung-Jung Park; Gillan Grimberg; Gil Kovalski; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Absolute myocardial blood flow vs relative myocardial perfusion: Which one is better?

Authors:  Tali Sharir; Gil Kovalski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Emerging Tracers for Nuclear Cardiac PET Imaging.

Authors:  Dong-Yeon Kim; Sang-Geon Cho; Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-08

7.  Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Brian G Abbott; James A Case; Sharmila Dorbala; Andrew J Einstein; James R Galt; Robert Pagnanelli; Renée P Bullock-Palmer; Prem Soman; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with dynamic SPECT acquisitions: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Fabien Hyafil; François Rouzet; Dominique Le Guludec
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Failure to accurately identify the number of diseased coronary arteries: A weakness of SPECT MPI.

Authors:  Dennis A Calnon
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Automatic evaluation of myocardial perfusion on SPECT: Need for "Normality".

Authors:  Riccardo Liga; Alessia Gimelli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.