Literature DB >> 27359222

Recognition thresholds for static and dynamic emotional faces.

Manuel G Calvo1, Pedro Avero1, Andrés Fernández-Martín2, Guillermo Recio3.   

Abstract

We investigated the minimum expressive intensity that is required to recognize (above chance) static and dynamic facial expressions of happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, and surprise. To this end, we varied the degree of intensity of emotional expressions unfolding from a neutral face, by means of graphics morphing software. The resulting face stimuli (photographs and short videos) were presented in an expression categorization task for 1 s each, and measures of sensitivity or discrimination (A') were collected to establish thresholds. A number of physical, perceptual, categorical, and affective controls were performed. All six basic emotions were reliably recognized above chance level from low intensities, although recognition thresholds varied for different expressions: 20% of intensity, for happiness; 40%, for sadness, surprise, anger, and disgust; and 50%, for fear. The advantage of happy faces may be due to their greater physical change in facial features (as shown by automated facial expression measurement), also at low levels of intensity, relative to neutral faces. Recognition thresholds and the pattern of confusions across expressions were, nevertheless, equivalent for dynamic and static expressions, although dynamic expressions were recognized more accurately and faster. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27359222     DOI: 10.1037/emo0000192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  18 in total

1.  Presentation and validation of the DuckEES child and adolescent dynamic facial expressions stimulus set.

Authors:  Nicole R Giuliani; John C Flournoy; Elizabeth J Ivie; Arielle Von Hippel; Jennifer H Pfeifer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 2.  Impaired Recognition of Emotional Faces after Stroke Involving Right Amygdala or Insula.

Authors:  Donna C Tippett; Brittany R Godin; Kumiko Oishi; Kenichi Oishi; Cameron Davis; Yessenia Gomez; Lydia A Trupe; Eun Hye Kim; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.761

3.  Correlations Between Psychological Status and Perception of Facial Expression.

Authors:  Sujin Bae; Eunhee Rhee; Beom Seuk Hwang; Young Don Son; Ji Hyun Bae; Doug Hyun Han
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.202

4.  Subnormal short-latency facial mimicry responses to dynamic emotional facial expressions in male adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits.

Authors:  Anton van Boxtel; Ruud Zaalberg; Minet de Wied
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  Pain E-motion Faces Database (PEMF): Pain-related micro-clips for emotion research.

Authors:  Roberto Fernandes-Magalhaes; Alberto Carpio; David Ferrera; Dimitri Van Ryckeghem; Irene Peláez; Paloma Barjola; María Eugenia De Lahoz; María Carmen Martín-Buro; José Antonio Hinojosa; Stefaan Van Damme; Luis Carretié; Francisco Mercado
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-17

6.  Recognition of facial emotions of varying intensities by three-year-olds.

Authors:  Laurie Bayet; Hannah F Behrendt; Julia K Cataldo; Alissa Westerlund; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-10-18

7.  The angry versus happy recognition advantage: the role of emotional and physical properties.

Authors:  Filipa Barros; Sandra C Soares; Marta Rocha; Pedro Bem-Haja; Samuel Silva; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-03

8.  KDEF-PT: Valence, Emotional Intensity, Familiarity and Attractiveness Ratings of Angry, Neutral, and Happy Faces.

Authors:  Margarida V Garrido; Marília Prada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-19

9.  Event-related potentials to changes in facial expression in two-phase transitions.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Lisa K Kuhn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A robust method for measuring an individual's sensitivity to facial expressions.

Authors:  Louise S Delicato
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.