T Kurzweg1, J Kimmeyer2, R Knecht3, T K Hoffmann2, C-J Busch3, B B Lörincz3, P J Schuler2, S Laban2. 1. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer Center of the University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. t.kurzweg@uke.de. 2. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Head & Neck Cancer Center Ulm, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 3. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer Center of the University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: For the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), there are currently no official standard of care guidelines in German-speaking countries, with the exception of oral cavity cancer. In order to learn about the applied treatment modalities in the clinical routine, we conducted a web-based survey to evaluate the local standards of palliative and curative treatment of HNSCC. This article focuses on the curative treatment options and organ preservation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey consisted of a web-based questionnaire that was performed between November 2013 and July 2014. The questionnaire included ten multiple-choice questions and four open questions in the section about curative treatment. RESULTS: Altogether, 62 of the 204 addressed centers participated in the survey. For primary chemoradiation (CRT), most centers used a platinum-based chemotherapy (52/54, 96.3 %). Induction chemotherapy (ICT) was offered in 37 of the 62 centers (60 %). In oral cavity cancer, CRT and ICT were used in 37.5 and 4.3 % of the cases, respectively. In oropharyngeal cancer, CRT and ICT were applied in 44.5 and 10.3 % of cases, respectively. For hypopharyngeal cancer, 44.8 % of the patients received CRT and 11.8 % received ICT, while for laryngeal cancer 35.9 % received CRT and 9.4 % underwent ICT. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that a variety of treatments are used for HNSCC within German-speaking countries. Many centers offer ICT. The majority of the hospitals uses platinum-based therapy as a conservative first-line option in their organ preservation protocols.
INTRODUCTION: For the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), there are currently no official standard of care guidelines in German-speaking countries, with the exception of oral cavity cancer. In order to learn about the applied treatment modalities in the clinical routine, we conducted a web-based survey to evaluate the local standards of palliative and curative treatment of HNSCC. This article focuses on the curative treatment options and organ preservation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey consisted of a web-based questionnaire that was performed between November 2013 and July 2014. The questionnaire included ten multiple-choice questions and four open questions in the section about curative treatment. RESULTS: Altogether, 62 of the 204 addressed centers participated in the survey. For primary chemoradiation (CRT), most centers used a platinum-based chemotherapy (52/54, 96.3 %). Induction chemotherapy (ICT) was offered in 37 of the 62 centers (60 %). In oral cavity cancer, CRT and ICT were used in 37.5 and 4.3 % of the cases, respectively. In oropharyngeal cancer, CRT and ICT were applied in 44.5 and 10.3 % of cases, respectively. For hypopharyngeal cancer, 44.8 % of the patients received CRT and 11.8 % received ICT, while for laryngeal cancer 35.9 % received CRT and 9.4 % underwent ICT. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that a variety of treatments are used for HNSCC within German-speaking countries. Many centers offer ICT. The majority of the hospitals uses platinum-based therapy as a conservative first-line option in their organ preservation protocols.
Authors: Robert Haddad; Anne O'Neill; Guilherme Rabinowits; Roy Tishler; Fadlo Khuri; Douglas Adkins; Joseph Clark; Nicholas Sarlis; Jochen Lorch; Jonathan J Beitler; Sewanti Limaye; Sarah Riley; Marshall Posner Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ezra E W Cohen; Theodore G Karrison; Masha Kocherginsky; Jeffrey Mueller; Robyn Egan; Chao H Huang; Bruce E Brockstein; Mark B Agulnik; Bharat B Mittal; Furhan Yunus; Sandeep Samant; Luis E Raez; Ranee Mehra; Priya Kumar; Frank Ondrey; Patrice Marchand; Bettina Braegas; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Victoria M Villaflor; Daniel J Haraf; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A S Garden; J Harris; E E Vokes; A A Forastiere; J A Ridge; C Jones; E M Horwitz; B S Glisson; L Nabell; J S Cooper; W Demas; E Gore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S G Taylor; A K Murthy; J M Vannetzel; P Colin; M Dray; D D Caldarelli; S Shott; E Vokes; J L Showel; J C Hutchinson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arlene A Forastiere; Qiang Zhang; Randal S Weber; Moshe H Maor; Helmuth Goepfert; Thomas F Pajak; William Morrison; Bonnie Glisson; Andy Trotti; John A Ridge; Wade Thorstad; Henry Wagner; John F Ensley; Jay S Cooper Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lara Bußmann; Simon Laban; Claus Wittekindt; Carmen Stromberger; Silke Tribius; Nikolaus Möckelmann; Arne Böttcher; Christian Stephan Betz; Jens Peter Klussmann; Volker Budach; Adrian Muenscher; Chia-Jung Busch Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 4.430