Literature DB >> 23321550

Results of chemoselection with short induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or surgery in the treatment of functionally inoperable carcinomas of the pharynx and larynx.

Sabine Semrau1, Daniela Schmidt, Michael Lell, Frank Waldfahrer, Sebstian Lettmaier, Torsten Kuwert, Heinrich Iro, Rainer Fietkau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chemoradiation is the treatment of choice for carcinomas of the pharynx and larynx with imminent loss of organ or function. However, the prognosis after CRT decreases when salvage surgery becomes necessary. Single-cycle induction chemotherapy is therefore performed to identify patients who would benefit more from S than from CRT. The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients received Induction Chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin and were subsequently assessed for tumor response. Responders achieving a ≥30% decrease in endoscopic tumor size and a ≥20% decrease in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake proceeded to primary Chemoradiation (CRT) and non-responders received surgery (S). Six weeks after CRT patients with residual tumors underwent secondary surgery (S).
RESULTS: Thirty eight patients were elected for CRT and 9 received S. A local control rate of 86.1% and disease-free survival of 80.4% was achieved at 2 years. Overall treatment time in CRT-patients >80 days was associated with inferior disease-free survival (p = 0.05), cause-specific survival (p = 0.02), overall survival (p = 0.01) and a trend to inferior local control (p = 0.07) at 2 years.
CONCLUSION: The strategy of selecting patients for CRT vs. S based on the response to IC achieves encouraging rates of disease control by surgery and CRT.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23321550     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  10 in total

1.  [No improvement in survival with induction chemotherapy prior to chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results of a randomised phase 3 trial (PARADIGM)].

Authors:  S Semrau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  [Laryngeal preservation with induction chemotherapy for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma].

Authors:  G Psychogios; J Zenk
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Survival Rates Using Individualized Bioselection Treatment Methods in Patients With Advanced Laryngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Gregory T Wolf; Emily Bellile; Avraham Eisbruch; Susan Urba; Carol R Bradford; Lisa Peterson; Mark E Prince; Theodoros N Teknos; Douglas B Chepeha; Norman D Hogikyan; Scott A McLean; Jeffery Moyer; Jeremy M G Taylor; Francis P Worden
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : Organ preservation strategies in clinical routine in German-speaking countries.

Authors:  T Kurzweg; J Kimmeyer; R Knecht; T K Hoffmann; C-J Busch; B B Lörincz; P J Schuler; S Laban
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  F18-FDG PET/CT imaging early predicts pathologic complete response to induction chemoimmunotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer: preliminary single-center analysis of the checkrad-cd8 trial.

Authors:  M Hecht; S Semrau; M Beck; J Hartwich; M Eckstein; D Schmidt; A O Gostian; S Müller; S Rutzner; U S Gaipl; J von der Grün; T Illmer; M G Hautmann; G Klautke; J Döscher; T Brunner; B Tamaskovics; A Hartmann; H Iro; T Kuwert; R Fietkau
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.258

6.  Tumor Volume Reduction Rate to Induction Chemotherapy is a Prognostic Factor for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ting-Chun Lin; Chi-Hsien Huang; Ming-Yu Lien; Fu-Ming Cheng; Kai-Chiun Li; Chih-Yuan Lin; Ying-Chun Lin; Ji-An Liang; Ti-Hao Wang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  Dose-dependent deterioration of swallowing function after induction chemotherapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy for laryngopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  M Haderlein; S Semrau; O Ott; S Speer; C Bohr; R Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 8.  Response assessment after induction chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: From physical examination to modern imaging techniques and beyond.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Gregory T Wolf; Bart de Keizer; Iain J Nixon; Dana M Hartl; Arlene A Forastiere; Missak Haigentz; Alessandra Rinaldo; Juan P Rodrigo; Nabil F Saba; Carlos Suárez; Jan B Vermorken; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Factors that affect PERCIST-defined test-retest comparability: an exploration of feasibility in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Daniel King Hung Tong; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.794

10.  Association between treatment package time and clinical predictors in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Hidenori Suzuki; Tsuneo Tamaki; Hidenori Tsuzuki; Masami Nishio; Daisuke Nishikawa; Shintaro Beppu; Nobuhiro Hanai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.