| Literature DB >> 27355960 |
Anton N Yurchenko1, Olga F Smetanina2, Elena V Ivanets3, Anatoly I Kalinovsky4, Yuliya V Khudyakova5, Natalya N Kirichuk6, Roman S Popov7, Carsten Bokemeyer8, Gunhild von Amsberg9, Ekaterina A Chingizova10, Shamil Sh Afiyatullov11, Sergey A Dyshlovoy12,13,14.
Abstract
Three new epidithiodiketopiperazines pretrichodermamides D-F (1-3), together with the known N-methylpretrichodermamide B (4) and pretrichodermamide С (5), were isolated from the lipophilic extract of the marine algae-derived fungus Penicillium sp. KMM 4672. The structures of compounds 1-5 were determined based on spectroscopic methods. The absolute configuration of pretrichodermamide D (1) was established by a combination of modified Mosher's method, NOESY data, and biogenetic considerations. N-Methylpretrichodermamide B (5) showed strong cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 human prostate cancer cells resistant to androgen receptor targeted therapies.Entities:
Keywords: cytotoxicity; diketopiperazine; marine-derived fungus; oxazadecaline; secondary metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27355960 PMCID: PMC4962012 DOI: 10.3390/md14070122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Chemical structures of isolated compounds 1–5.
NMR spectroscopic data (DMSO-d6) for pretrichodermamides D–F (1–3).
| Position | 1 a | 2 b | 3 b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δС, mult | δH ( | δС, mult | δH ( | δС, mult | δH ( | |
| 1 | 165.4, C | - | 165.5, C | - | 165.4, C | - |
| 2 | 68.0, C | - | 67.7, C | - | 69.1, C | - |
| 3 | 38.4, CH2 | α: 2.17, d (15.3) | 39.0, CH2 | α: 2.22, d (15.7) | 35.6, CH2 | α: 1.93, brd (15.5) |
| 4 | 66.9, C | - | 67.0, C | - | 67.4, C | - |
| 5 | 133.8, CH | 5.56, d (10.1) | 131.8, CH | 5.54, dd (10.1, 2.2) | 69.2, CH | 3.69, d (5.5) |
| 6 | 127.4, CH | 5.60, dd (10.0, 4.4) | 129.7, CH | 5.43, dd (10.2, 2.2) | 126.9, CH | 5.69, ddd (10.0, 5.1, 2.3) |
| 7 | 65.8, CH | 4.03, q (4.5) | 72.2, CH | 3.96, tt (7.7, 2.2) | 131.2, CH | 5.56, dd (9.9, 2.5) |
| 8 | 66.2, CH | 3.74, ddd (9.4, 6.6, 4.6) | 71.0, CH | 3.56, ddd (10.7, 7.7, 5.7) | 64.6, CH | 4.16, m |
| 9 | 81.9, CH | 4.12, d (9.4) | 83.4, CH | 3.83, d (10.7) | 83.5, CH | 3.97, dd (7.1, 1.5) |
| 1′ | 164.2, C | - | 164.4, C | - | 163.8, C | - |
| 2′ | 66.0, CH | 4.56, d (2.6) | 65.7, CH | 4.57, d (2.6) | 65.4, CH | 4.57, d (2.6) |
| 3′ | 41.4, CH | 4.55, d (2.5) | 41.5, CH | 4.58, d (2.5) | 41.0, CH | 4.59, d (2.5) |
| 4′ | 116.3, C | - | 116.3, C | - | 116.3, C | - |
| 5′ | 122.6, CH | 7.32, d (8.8) | 122.6, CH | 7.32, d (8.8) | 122.7, CH | 7.35, d (8.8) |
| 6′ | 103.3, CH | 6.55, d (8.8) | 103.3, CH | 6.55, d (8.8) | 103.2, CH | 6.54, d (8.8) |
| 7′ | 153.0, C | - | 153.0, C | - | 152.8, C | - |
| 8′ | 135.9, C | - | 135.9, C | - | 135.8, C | - |
| 9′ | 147.6, C | - | 147.5, C | - | 147.5, C | - |
| 10′ | 32.6, CH3 | 2.96, s | 32.6, CH3 | 2.96, s | 32.5, CH3 | 2.96, s |
| 7′-OMe | 55.7, CH3 | 3.78, s | 55.6, CH3 | 3.78, s | 55.6, CH3 | 3.78, s |
| 8′-OMe | 60.2, CH3 | 3.68, s | 60.2, CH3 | 3.68, s | 60.2, CH3 | 3.68, s |
| 9′-OH | - | 9.43, s | - | 9.42, s | - | 9.38, s |
| 4-OH | - | 5.26, s | - | 5.29, s | - | 4.96, brs |
| 5-OH | - | - | - | - | - | 5.19, d (5.6) |
| 7-OH | - | 4.89, d (5.4) | - | 5.02, d (6.9) | - | |
| 8-OH | - | 4.35, d (6.6) | - | 4.64, d (5.7) | - | 5.15, d (6.7) |
a 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data were measured at 500.13 MHz and 125.77 MHz, respectively; b 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data were measured at 700.00 MHz and 176.04 MHz, respectively.
Figure 2∆δ (δS−δR) values (in Hz) for the MTPA ester of 1.
Figure 3Energy-minimized 3D models of 1–3 with selected ROESY correlations.