Literature DB >> 27355435

Striatal activation reflects urgency in perceptual decision making.

Leendert van Maanen1, Laura Fontanesi2, Guy E Hawkins3, Birte U Forstmann3.   

Abstract

Deciding between multiple courses of action often entails an increasing need to do something as time passes - a sense of urgency. This notion of urgency is not incorporated in standard theories of speeded decision making that assume information is accumulated until a critical fixed threshold is reached. Yet, it is hypothesized in novel theoretical models of decision making. In two experiments, we investigated the behavioral and neural evidence for an "urgency signal" in human perceptual decision making. Experiment 1 found that as the duration of the decision making process increased, participants made a choice based on less evidence for the selected option. Experiment 2 replicated this finding, and additionally found that variability in this effect across participants covaried with activation in the striatum. We conclude that individual differences in susceptibility to urgency are reflected by striatal activation. By dynamically updating a response threshold, the striatum is involved in signaling urgency in humans.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Striatum; Urgency; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355435     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  15 in total

1.  Motor cortex disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; David Thura; Paul Cisek; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Some task demands induce collapsing bounds: Evidence from a behavioral analysis.

Authors:  James J Palestro; Emily Weichart; Per B Sederberg; Brandon M Turner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Confluence of Timing and Reward Biases in Perceptual Decision-Making Dynamics.

Authors:  Maxwell Shinn; Daniel B Ehrlich; Daeyeol Lee; John D Murray; Hyojung Seo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Errors in Action Timing and Inhibition Facilitate Learning by Tuning Distinct Mechanisms in the Underlying Decision Process.

Authors:  Kyle Dunovan; Timothy Verstynen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Non-parametric mixture modeling of cognitive psychological data: A new method to disentangle hidden strategies.

Authors:  Kim Archambeau; Joaquina Couto; Leendert Van Maanen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-11

6.  Evidence integration and decision confidence are modulated by stimulus consistency.

Authors:  Moshe Glickman; Rani Moran; Marius Usher
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 7.  Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.

Authors:  Rebecca Brewer; Jennifer Murphy; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  High monetary reward rates and caloric rewards decrease temporal persistence.

Authors:  Bowen J Fung; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Core body temperature speeds up temporal processing and choice behavior under deadlines.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Robbert van der Mijn; Maurice H P H van Beurden; Linsey M M Roijendijk; Boris R M Kingma; Steven Miletić; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Bridging Neural and Computational Viewpoints on Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Redmond G O'Connell; Michael N Shadlen; KongFatt Wong-Lin; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.