| Literature DB >> 27355397 |
Esa Jantunen1, Ville Varmavuo2, Jaakko Valtola1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and chemotherapy or G-CSF alone are the most common mobilization regimens for autotransplantations. Plerixafor is used for mobilization of CD34(+) cells with G-CSF in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and myeloma (MM) patients. AREAS COVERED: The available phase II and III data on plerixafor has been reviewed. The efficacy of plerixafor in the mobilization of CD34(+) cells in predicted poor mobilizers as well as in patients who had failed a mobilization has been evaluated. The pre-emptive use of plerixafor as well as studies on cost-effectiveness are covered. Also effects in the composition of the collected grafts along with the data on long-term outcome of plerixafor-mobilized patients is discussed. Expert commentary: Plerixafor combined with G-CSF mobilizes CD34(+) cells more efficiently than G-CSF alone in patients with NHL or MM. In phase III studies, engraftment after high-dose therapy has been comparable to G-CSF mobilized patients. The pre-emptive use of plerixafor added to mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF or with G-CSF alone has gained more popularity. This approach may be more cost-effective than the routine use of this drug. The changes observed in the composition of grafts after plerixafor injection may have implications for post-transplant events.Entities:
Keywords: Plerixafor; costs; graft content; lymphoma; myeloma; outcome; poor mobilization; stem cell mobilization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27355397 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2016.1208082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Hematol ISSN: 1747-4094 Impact factor: 2.929