Literature DB >> 27354746

Enhancing the Budget Impact Model for Institutional Use: A Tool with Practical Applications for the Hospital Oncology Pharmacy.

Lisa M Hess, Frank N Cinfio, Stewart Wetmore, Collin Churchill, Christopher Fausel, Amine Ale-Ali, Steven Gelwicks, Christopher A Bly, Sinem Perk, Robert W Klein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cost of cancer care is increasing, and tools are needed to understand the economic impact of new drugs on the hospital pharmacy budget.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an interactive budget impact model (BIM) through a collaborative effort of industry, academia, and modeling experts to evaluate the use of a new agent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); this BIM included an institutional module specific to the needs of practices that purchase medications for use in institutional settings.
METHODS: Treatment regimens, doses, duration of therapy, toxicity, and cost data are from published sources. All input data may be modified to match the local population. Outputs include cost of care, reimbursement, and margin overall and by treatment regimen.
RESULTS: The base case assumes 20 NSCLC patients progressing after initial therapy (3 receiving ramucirumab+docetaxel, 2 bevacizumab+erlotinib, 3 docetaxel, 6 erlotinib, and 6 pemetrexed), wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) purchase price, and reimbursement at WAC+4.3%. The model estimated the total cost and reimbursement for the institutional oncology pharmacy to be $699,413 and $729,487, respectively, resulting in a margin of $30,075 (difference due to rounding) for the year for regimens utilized in the treatment of NSCLC in the post-progression setting. Results will vary depending on the input data.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing need for institutional pharmacies to plan ahead and anticipate the impact of new drugs on their oncology budgets. This interactive Excel-based institutional BIM may provide evidence-based support for pharmacy decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  budget impact; economics; hospital; non-small cell lung cancer; pharmacy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27354746      PMCID: PMC4911985          DOI: 10.1310/hpj5106-452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0018-5787


  11 in total

1.  AMCP Format dossier requests: manufacturer response and formulary implications for one large health plan.

Authors:  Joshua J Spooner; Pranav K Gandhi; Susan Brown Connelly
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

2.  Manufacturer response to AMCP Format dossier requests.

Authors:  Alan Lyles; John D Watkins
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2007-04

3.  FDA Approval Summary: Ramucirumab for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Sandra J Casak; Ibilola Fashoyin-Aje; Steven J Lemery; Lillian Zhang; Runyan Jin; Hongshan Li; Liang Zhao; Hong Zhao; Hui Zhang; Huanyu Chen; Kun He; Michele Dougherty; Rachel Novak; Sarah Kennett; Sachia Khasar; Whitney Helms; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Strategic use of clinical pathways.

Authors:  Dean H Gesme; Marian Wiseman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Cancer mortality reductions were greatest among countries where cancer care spending rose the most, 1995-2007.

Authors:  Warren Stevens; Tomas J Philipson; Zeba M Khan; Joanna P MacEwan; Mark T Linthicum; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2015.

Authors:  Glen T Schumock; Edward C Li; Katie J Suda; Michelle D Wiest; Joann Stubbings; Linda M Matusiak; Robert J Hunkler; Lee C Vermeulen
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.

Authors:  Sean D Sullivan; Josephine A Mauskopf; Federico Augustovski; J Jaime Caro; Karen M Lee; Mark Minchin; Ewa Orlewska; Pete Penna; Jose-Manuel Rodriguez Barrios; Wen-Yi Shau
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Efficacy of bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy (BeTa): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Rafat Ansari; Frederique Bustin; Patrick Flynn; Lowell Hart; Gregory A Otterson; Gordana Vlahovic; Chang-Heok Soh; Paula O'Connor; John Hainsworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Treatment-by-histology interaction analyses in three phase III trials show superiority of pemetrexed in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Scagliotti; Thomas Brodowicz; Frances A Shepherd; Christoph Zielinski; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Lorinda Simms; Frank Fossella; Katherine Sugarman; Chandra P Belani
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Oscar Arrieta; Kumar Prabhash; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Tuncay Goksel; Keunchil Park; Vera Gorbunova; Ruben Dario Kowalyszyn; Joanna Pikiel; Grzegorz Czyzewicz; Sergey V Orlov; Conrad R Lewanski; Michael Thomas; Paolo Bidoli; Shaker Dakhil; Steven Gans; Joo-Hang Kim; Alexandru Grigorescu; Nina Karaseva; Martin Reck; Federico Cappuzzo; Ekaterine Alexandris; Andreas Sashegyi; Sergey Yurasov; Maurice Pérol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reliability of Conclusions from Early Analyses of Real-World Data for Newly Approved Drugs in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Michael Grabner; Liya Wang; Astra M Liepa; Xiaohong Ivy Li; Zhanglin Lin Cui; Lee Bowman; William R Schelman
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Assessing the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous delivery of rituximab: Benefits for payers, health care professionals, and patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  Michael J Harvey; Yi Zhong; Eric Morris; Jacob N Beverage; Robert S Epstein; Anita J Chawla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Economic implications of FDA platelet bacterial guidance compliance options: Comparison of single-step strategies.

Authors:  Katherine M Prioli; Ilze Abersone; Patricia M Kopko; Jay H Herman; Brian Custer; Laura T Pizzi
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.337

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.