Literature DB >> 27354102

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: results from the first multicenter study on endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video).

Mouen A Khashab1, Saowanee Ngamruengphong1, David Carr-Locke2, Amol Bapaye3, Petros C Benias2, Sam Serouya2, Shivangi Dorwat3, Dalton M Chaves4, Everson Artifon4, Eduardo G de Moura4, Vivek Kumbhari1, Yamile Haito Chavez1, Majidah Bukhari1, Gulara Hajiyeva1, Amr Ismail1, Yen-I Chen1, Hyunsoo Chung5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) recently has been reported as minimally invasive therapy for gastroparesis. The aims of this study were to report on the first multicenter experience with G-POEM and to assess the efficacy and safety of this novel procedure for patients with gastroparesis with symptoms refractory to medical therapy.
METHODS: All patients with gastroparesis who underwent endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) at 5 medical centers were included. Procedures were performed following the same principles as esophageal POEM. Clinical response was defined as improvement in gastroparetic symptoms with absence of recurrent hospitalization. Adverse events were graded according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with refractory gastroparesis (11 diabetic, 12 postsurgical, 7 idiopathic) underwent G-POEM. Previous therapies included Botox injection in 12, transpyloric stenting in 3, and PEG with jejunal extension (PEGJ) in 1. Nausea/vomiting were the predominant symptoms in 25 patients. Weight loss was present in 27 patients with an average of 10% loss of body weight. G-POEM was completed successfully in all 30 (100%) patients with a mean procedure time of 72 minutes (range, 35-223 min). The mean myotomy length was 2.6 ± 2.3 cm. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.3 days (range, 1-12 days). Two adverse events occurred in 2 (6.7%) patients, including 1 capnoperitoneum and 1 prepyloric ulcer, rated as mild and severe, respectively. Clinical response was observed in 26 (86%) patients during a median follow-up of 5.5 months. Four patients (2 diabetic, 1 postsurgical, 1 idiopathic cause) did not respond to G-POEM. Repeat gastric emptying scan was obtained in 17 patients, normalized in 8 (47%), and improved in 6 (35%) patients.
CONCLUSION: G-POEM is a technically feasible procedure. This small non-randomized study suggests the effectiveness of G-POEM for the treatment of patients with gastroparesis refractory to medical therapy. It concomitantly results in normalization of GES in a significant proportion of treated patients.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27354102     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  41 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Gastroparesis: What to Do and Whom to Treat?

Authors:  Roman V Petrov; Charles T Bakhos; Abbas E Abbas; Zubair Malik; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  Fluoroscopy-guided gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM): a more reliable and efficient method for treatment of refractory gastroparesis.

Authors:  H B Xue; H Z Fan; X M Meng; S Cristofaro; P Mekaroonkamol; S Dacha; L Y Li; X L Fu; S H Zhan; Q Cai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic Approaches to Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Kevin Liu; Thomas Enke; Aziz Aadam
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-09

4.  Understanding the Differences Between Gastroparesis and Gastroparesis-Like Syndrome: Filling a GaPing Hole?

Authors:  Jonathan Gotfried; Ron Schey
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  How I Do It: Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP).

Authors:  Matthew T Allemang; Andrew T Strong; Ivy N Haskins; John Rodriguez; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Matthew Kroh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Pyloric Therapies for Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Nitin K Ahuja; John O Clarke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

Review 7.  Botulinum Toxin as a Treatment for Refractory Gastroparesis: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Ashley Thomas; Bruno de Souza Ribeiro; Miguel Malespin; Silvio W de Melo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

8.  A Positive Correlation Between Gastric and Esophageal Dysmotility Suggests Common Causality.

Authors:  Thomas A Zikos; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos; Kirsten A Regalia; Irene S Sonu; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; Monica C Nandwani; Linda A Nguyen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Gastroparesis: Medical and Therapeutic Advances.

Authors:  Christopher M Navas; Nihal K Patel; Brian E Lacy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: initial results from a single institution.

Authors:  John H Rodriguez; Ivy N Haskins; Andrew T Strong; Ryan L Plescia; Matthew T Allemang; Robert S Butler; Michael S Cline; Kevin El-Hayek; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Matthew D Kroh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.