Ashley Thomas1, Bruno de Souza Ribeiro2, Miguel Malespin2, Silvio W de Melo3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 4555 Emerson Street, Suite 300, Jacksonville, FL, 32207, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 SW Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. demelo@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroparesis (GP) is a disorder of gastrointestinal motility which leads to delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Treatment is limited as many patients are refractory to dietary modification and the use prokinetic medications carry significant adverse risks. These limitations necessitate more research into experimental therapies. The purpose of this article is to summarize the known information and guidelines on the diagnosis and management of GP and to review the latest literature on experimental treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on the current available literature, there is conflicting data regarding the efficacy of intra-pyloric botulinum injections (IPBIs) for refractory gastroparesis. There have been many open-label trials showing good clinical response, but the only two randomized controlled trials on the matter showed no objective improvement gastric emptying studies. However, both studies were likely underpowered and changes in gastric emptying may not correlate with symptom improvement. As such, these discouraging findings should not be used to exclude botox from the armamentarium of therapies for refractory GP. More large-scale, double-blinded, multicenter randomized control trials are needed to further validate the long-term efficacy and safety of IPBI, as well as gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), as compared to gastric electrical stimulation (GES) or surgical intervention (i.e., laparoscopic pylorotomy) for refractory gastroparesis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroparesis (GP) is a disorder of gastrointestinal motility which leads to delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Treatment is limited as many patients are refractory to dietary modification and the use prokinetic medications carry significant adverse risks. These limitations necessitate more research into experimental therapies. The purpose of this article is to summarize the known information and guidelines on the diagnosis and management of GP and to review the latest literature on experimental treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on the current available literature, there is conflicting data regarding the efficacy of intra-pyloric botulinum injections (IPBIs) for refractory gastroparesis. There have been many open-label trials showing good clinical response, but the only two randomized controlled trials on the matter showed no objective improvement gastric emptying studies. However, both studies were likely underpowered and changes in gastric emptying may not correlate with symptom improvement. As such, these discouraging findings should not be used to exclude botox from the armamentarium of therapies for refractory GP. More large-scale, double-blinded, multicenter randomized control trials are needed to further validate the long-term efficacy and safety of IPBI, as well as gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), as compared to gastric electrical stimulation (GES) or surgical intervention (i.e., laparoscopic pylorotomy) for refractory gastroparesis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Botulinum toxin; Gastroparesis; Nausea and vomiting
Authors: Peter Bytzer; Nicholas J Talley; Johann Hammer; Lisa J Young; Michael P Jones; Michael Horowitz Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Madhusudan Grover; Gianrico Farrugia; Matthew S Lurken; Cheryl E Bernard; Maria Simonetta Faussone-Pellegrini; Thomas C Smyrk; Henry P Parkman; Thomas L Abell; William J Snape; William L Hasler; Aynur Ünalp-Arida; Linda Nguyen; Kenneth L Koch; Jorges Calles; Linda Lee; James Tonascia; Frank A Hamilton; Pankaj J Pasricha Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Dina Ezzeddine; Rajkamal Jit; Neil Katz; Narasimh Gopalswamy; Manoop S Bhutani Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: John H Rodriguez; Ivy N Haskins; Andrew T Strong; Ryan L Plescia; Matthew T Allemang; Robert S Butler; Michael S Cline; Kevin El-Hayek; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Matthew D Kroh Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: P Mekaroonkamol; L Y Li; S Dacha; Y Xu; S D Keilin; F F Willingham; Q Cai Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Mouen A Khashab; Sepideh Besharati; Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Vivek Kumbhari; Mohamad El Zein; Ellen M Stein; Alan Tieu; Gerard E Mullin; Sameer Dhalla; Monica C Nandwani; Vikesh Singh; Marcia I Canto; Anthony N Kalloo; John O Clarke Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Jolien Schol; Lucas Wauters; Ram Dickman; Vasile Drug; Agata Mulak; Jordi Serra; Paul Enck; Jan Tack Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 4.623