Literature DB >> 27353323

Wound haematoma following defibrillator implantation: incidence and predictors in the Shockless Implant Evaluation (SIMPLE) trial.

Simona Masiero1,2, Stuart J Connolly3, David Birnie4, Jörg Neuzner5, Stefan H Hohnloser6, Xavier Vinolas7, Josef Kautzner8, Gilles O'Hara9, Lieselot VanErven10, Fredrik Gadler11, Jia Wang3, Philippe Mabo12, Michael Glikson13, Valentina Kutyifa14, David J Wright15, Vidal Essebag16, Jeff S Healey3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Pocket haematoma is a common complication after defibrillator [implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)] implantation, which is not only painful, but also increases the risk of device-related infection, and possibly embolic events. The present study seeks to evaluate the rate and predictors of clinically significant pocket haematoma. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study included 2500 patients receiving an ICD in the SIMPLE trial. A clinically significant pocket haematoma was defined as a haematoma that required re-operation or interruption of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy. Clinically significant pocket haematoma occurred in 56 of 2500 patients (2.2%) of which 6 (10.7%) developed device-related infection. Patients who developed pocket haematoma were older (mean age 67.6 ± 8.8 years vs. 62.7 ± 11.6 years, P < 0.001), were more likely to have permanent atrial fibrillation (30.4 vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) and a history of stroke (17.9 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.004), or were more likely to receive peri-operative OAC (50.0 vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001), unfractionated heparin (16.1 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.003), or low-molecular-weight heparin (37.5 vs. 17.5%, P < 0.001). Independent predictors of wound haematoma on multivariable analysis included the use of heparin bridging (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.48-4.73, P = 0.001), sub-pectoral location of ICD (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.12-3.57, P =0.020), previous stroke (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.20-5.10, P = 0.015), an upgrade from permanent pacemaker (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.07-5.94, P = 0.035), and older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, P = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: Pocket haematoma remains an important complication of ICD implantation and is associated with a high risk of infection. Independent predictors of pocket haematoma include heparin bridging, prior stroke, sub-pectoral placement of ICD, older age, and upgrade from a pacemaker. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Pocket haematoma; Predictors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27353323     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua He; Bing-Bing Ke; Yan Li; Fu-Sheng Han; Xiaodong Li; Yu-Jie Zeng
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Bleeding risk of submuscular ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation versus heparin bridging therapy.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Ayhan Ayikli; Iris Wilke; Samer Hakmi; Yalin Yildirim; Nils Gosau; Hermann Reichenspurner; Stephan Willems; Muhammet Ali Aydin
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Rate, Time Course, and Predictors of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Infections: An Analysis From the SIMPLE Trial.

Authors:  François Philippon; Gilles E O'Hara; Jean Champagne; Stefan H Hohnloser; Michael Glikson; Jörg Neuzner; Philippe Mabo; Xavier Vinolas; Josef Kautzner; Fredrik Gadler; Noa Lashevsky; Stuart J Connolly; Yan Y Liu; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-04-25

4.  Prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: guidelines and conventional prophylaxis.

Authors:  Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist; Bozena Ostrowska
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Identifying the predictors of hematoma after device implantation: Closing in on the suspects with an aim to prevent the menace?

Authors:  Kartikeya Bhargava
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Fever and neck pain after pacemaker lead extraction: A case report.

Authors:  Shao-Xian Wang; Jian Bai; Rui Ma; Rong-Fang Lan; Jia Zheng; Wei Xu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Predictors of pocket hematoma after cardiac implantable electronic device surgery: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Sie Kronborg Fensman; Erik Lerkevang Grove; Jens Brock Johansen; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing; Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-08-18

8.  Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: insights from the BRUISE CONTROL trials.

Authors:  Girish M Nair; David H Birnie; Glen L Sumner; Andrew D Krahn; Jeffrey S Healey; Pablo B Nery; Eli Kalfon; Atul Verma; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Benoit Coutu; Giuliano Becker; François Philippon; John Eikelboom; Roopinder K Sandhu; John Sapp; Richard Leather; Derek Yung; Bernard Thibault; Christopher S Simpson; Kamran Ahmad; Marcio Sturmer; Katherine Kavanagh; Eugene Crystal; George A Wells; Vidal Essebag
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Early-BYRD: alternative early pacing and defibrillation lead replacement avoiding venous puncture.

Authors:  Andreas Keyser; Simon Schopka; Carsten Jungbauer; Maik Foltan; Christof Schmid
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 1.637

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.