Pascal Weigold1, Mohamed El-Hadidi2, Alexander Ruecker1, Daniel H Huson2, Thomas Scholten3, Maik Jochmann4, Andreas Kappler1, Sebastian Behrens5,6. 1. Geomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tuebingen, Germany. 2. Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics, University of Tuebingen, Germany. 3. Soil Science and Geomorphology, Geography, University of Tuebingen, Germany. 4. Instrumental Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. 5. Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA. 6. BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Abstract
In soils halogens (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine) are cycled through the transformation of inorganic halides into organohalogen compounds and vice versa. There is evidence that these reactions are microbially driven but the key enzymes and groups of microorganisms involved are largely unknown. Our aim was to uncover the diversity, abundance and distribution of genes encoding for halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes in a German forest soil by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Metagenomic libraries of three soil horizons revealed the presence of genera known to be involved in halogenation and dehalogenation processes such as Bradyrhizobium or Pseudomonas. We detected a so far unknown diversity of genes encoding for (de)halogenating enzymes in the soil metagenome including specific and unspecific halogenases as well as metabolic and cometabolic dehalogenases. Genes for non-heme, no-metal chloroperoxidases and haloalkane dehalogenases were the most abundant halogenase and dehalogenase genes, respectively. The high diversity and abundance of (de)halogenating enzymes suggests a strong microbial contribution to natural halogen cycling. This was also confirmed in microcosm experiments in which we quantified the biotic formation of chloroform and bromoform. Knowledge on microorganisms and genes that catalyze (de)halogenation reactions is critical because they are highly relevant to industrial biotechnologies and bioremediation applications.
In soils halogens (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine) are cycled through the transformation of inorganichalides into organohalogen compounds and vice versa. There is evidence that these reactions are microbially driven but the key enzymes and groups of microorganisms involved are largely unknown. Our aim was to uncover the diversity, abundance and distribution of genes encoding for halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes in a German forest soil by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Metagenomic libraries of three soil horizons revealed the presence of genera known to be involved in halogenation and dehalogenation processes such as Bradyrhizobium or Pseudomonas. We detected a so far unknown diversity of genes encoding for (de)halogenating enzymes in the soil metagenome including specific and unspecific halogenases as well as metabolic and cometabolic dehalogenases. Genes for non-heme, no-metal chloroperoxidases and haloalkane dehalogenases were the most abundant halogenase and dehalogenase genes, respectively. The high diversity and abundance of (de)halogenating enzymes suggests a strong microbial contribution to natural halogen cycling. This was also confirmed in microcosm experiments in which we quantified the biotic formation of chloroform and bromoform. Knowledge on microorganisms and genes that catalyze (de)halogenation reactions is critical because they are highly relevant to industrial biotechnologies and bioremediation applications.
Halogenated organic compounds are diverse and widespread in nature. For a long time it
was assumed that these compounds are only produced and released by anthropogenic
sources1. Organohalogens like perchloroethene and trichloroethene are
prominent groundwater pollutants due to their industrial use as dry cleaning and
degreasing agents and their widespread accidental and deliberate release into the
environment2. Volatile organohalogens (VOX) like chloromethane
strongly influence atmospheric chemistry and thereby Earth’s climate by
causing ozone depletion when released into the atmosphere34. Many
organohalogens are of biological relevance e.g. in secondary metabolism. They are
involved in various chemical defence mechanisms5, like the synthesis of
the antibiotic pyrrolnitrin used in microbial antagonism by Pseudomonas
fluorescens6. Furthermore, organohalogens, e.g. chloromethane,
are metabolites involved in enzymatic lignin decomposition by fungi789. To date, over 5000 naturally occurring organohalogen compounds have been
identified10. Abiotic sources of organohalogens in the environment
are e.g. volcanic activities11 and biomass burning1213.
In soils organohalogens are produced during the abiotic oxidation of organic matter by
Fe(III)14. The release of organohalogens, especially of VOX, has been
demonstrated for various environments such as hypersaline lakes1516,
freshwater wetlands17, marine environments1819 and
soils1420212223. The occurrence of a natural halogen cycling
in soils was demonstrated in several studies, which mainly focused on the natural
cycling of chlorine242526. The turnover of chlorine in soil, namely
the formation and decomposition of organicchlorine is due to both biotic and abiotic
reactions2728. However, it was shown that the natural chlorination
processes in soils are primarily biotic2930. Furthermore, several
studies provided evidence for biotic dehalogenation potential in soils and their
important environmental implications for contaminant removal313233.
Biotic halogenation and dehalogenation reactions are catalyzed by enzymes. A major group
of halogenating enzymes are the haloperoxidases which unspecifically halogenate organic
matter using hydrogen peroxide and a halogen ion (Cl−,
Br−, I−) as substrate34353637. Based on their cofactors they can be classified into
heme-dependent haloperoxidases38 and vanadium-dependent
haloperoxidases39. Perhydrolases, or non-heme, no-metal
haloperoxidases also require hydrogen peroxide and catalyze unspecific halogenation
reactions but do not contain any metal cofactors36. Beside the
haloperoxidases also halogenases with specific and regioselective halogenation reaction
mechanisms exist. Flavin-dependent halogenases are involved in bacterial secondary
metabolism, e.g. antibiotic syntheses40. Another class of specific
halogenases are the alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent halogenases41. One
known halogenase, a bacterial fluorinase, is able to fluorinateS-adenosyl-L-methionine
via a nucleophilic mechanism42. Furthermore, methyltransferases of
plants, fungi and algae43 are known to form halomethanes. Since
organohalogen compounds are prominent environmental pollutants, their biotic degradation
has been studied intensely in the past decades and a variety of different dehalogenation
pathways including hydrolytic dehalogenation, dehydrohalogenation, thiolytic
dehalogenation and intramolecular substitution have been described3644.
Dehalogenation of halomethanes by methyltransfer was described for bacterial
methyltransferases4546. Microorganisms can use organohalogens
either as carbon source (metabolic degradation)31 or they are
co-metabolically degraded during the degradation of primary substrates such as
methane47. Metabolic and cometabolic degradation of organohalogens
are possible under oxic and anoxic conditions3148. Organohalogens can
even be used as terminal electron acceptor in a metabolism called organohalide
respiration49. Numerous pathways and enzymes involved in biotic
halogenation and dehalogenation reactions have been identified. But so far little is
known about the natural diversity and abundance of the different groups of halogenating
and dehalogenating enzymes. It is further not well understood which genes and
microorganisms are the main contributors to biotic halogen cycling2728.
Natural halogenation in soils is widespread and not only restricted to forest soils. It
also occurs in grasslands and agricultural soils and the microbial chlorination and
dechlorination of soil organic matter seems to be an ubiquitous phenomenon50. Knowledge on the microbial potential for halogenation and
dehalogenation reactions in soils is important, since soils act as important sources of
volatile organohalogens (e.g. CHCl351), as well as sinks for
natural and anthropogenic organohalogen compounds32. Here we combined
geochemical analyses with microcosm experiments and shotgun metagenomics to unravel the
natural diversity and relative abundance of genes encoding for halogenating and
dehalogenating enzymes in a forest soil.
Material and Methods
Sampling
The sampling site (N 48°30′24″, E
9°02′29″, WGS) is located in the Schoenbuch
wildlife park, a forest close to Tuebingen in Southwest Germany (Fig. 1A). The forest area is predominated by beech with populations
of oak, spruce and bald cypress. The soil has been qualified as vertic cambisol
(WRB52). Three soil horizons were distinguished according to
the German Soil Classification53: Of-horizon
(1–0 cm), Ah-horizon (0–15 cm)
and IIP-horizon (15–40 cm) (Fig.
1B).
Figure 1
(A)
Map of southern Germany and the location of the sampling site within the
Schoenbuch wildlife park. Areas shaded in light grey represent forest areas,
whereas the area shaded in dark grey represents the Schoenbuch wildlife park
territory. (B) Soil depth profile at the sampling site with the two
topsoil horizons (Of and Ah) and one subsoil horizon (IIP). The map was
created with Adobe Illustrator CC (URL: http://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html).
At the sampling site two replicate soil profiles were sampled within a distance
of 2 m from each other. Bulk soil samples for each profile were
collected from the three distinguishable horizons of the top 40 cm,
homogenized and stored at −80 °C for genetic
analysis. For biogeochemical analysis bulk samples of the two soil profiles were
mixed, homogenized and stored at 4 °C. Samples were
taken in October 2013.
Geochemical analysis
For water content determination, fresh soil samples were weighed and subsequently
dried at 105 °C until weight stability. pH was measured
in a suspension of 10 g air dried soil in 25 mL of a
0.01 M CaCl2-solution. For determination of leachable
chloride and leachable organiccarbon, 10 g of soil were mixed with
100 mL deionized water and shaken at 150 rpm for
24 h on a rotary shaker. Samples were centrifuged for
5 minutes at 4000 × g and
filtered through a 0.45 μm pore size cellulose ester
filter (Millex HA filter, EMD Millipore Corporation, USA). Dissolved organiccarbon was measured with a High TOC Elementar system (Elementar Analysensysteme
GmbH, Hanau, Germany) and chloride was determined by ion chromatography (Dionex
DX 120, Thermo Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). For total organiccarbon
analysis soil samples were dried at 40 °C and sieved
(2 mm mesh) to exclude large roots and stones. The organiccarbon
content was determined by heat combustion (1150 °C) and
thermal conductivity analysis on a CNS element analyzer (Elementar Vario EL III,
Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). Adsorbable organichalogen
(AOX) content in the soil samples was determined according to the standard
protocol (DIN EN ISO 9562) for soil leachates (DIN EN 12457-4) at the Laboratory
for Environmental and Product Analytics (DEKRA GmbH, Halle, Germany).
Detection of volatile organohalogen compounds
Microcosm experiments to quantify formation of volatile organohalogen compounds
(VOX) in the soil horizons via GC-MS were set up in triplicates per soil horizon
as follows: 3.5 g of native soil were incubated with
8.5 mL of sterile deionized water and incubated for 1 h
at 30 °C in the dark prior to VOX quantification.
Details on incubation conditions and GC-MS measurements have been published
previously15.
DNA extraction
Three different methods were applied to extract genomic DNA from the replicate
soil samples. 10 g of soil were used for extraction with the
PowerMax® Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio
Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Furthermore we applied a microwave-based
extraction method54 with the following modifications: all steps
were up-scaled for the extraction of DNA from 6 g of soil and DNA
was precipitated by mixing the supernatant from the
chloroform-isoamylalcohol-extraction with an equal amount of isopropanol
followed by a 1 h incubation step at room temperature. The third DNA
extraction protocol was based on a sodium-dodecyl-sulfate method combined with
freeze-thawing, protein digestion and chloroform-isoamylalcohol extraction55. Since the DNA extracts of the latter two methods were still of
brownish color, DNA was further purified by agarose gel electrophoresis using
0.7% agarose gels. High molecular weight DNA bands were excised from the agarose
gels and subsequently extracted and purified using the
Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega,
Madison WI, USA). DNA extracts were stored at
−20 °C until further processing. Prior to
sequencing DNA extracts derived from the replicate soil samples were pooled in
equimolar quantities per sample. Quality and molecular weight of the genomic DNA
extracts were confirmed by agarose gelelectrophoresis. 260/280 nm
absorbance ratio as a measure of DNA purity was determined with a
NanoDrop® ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Metagenomic sequencing
For each of the duplicate soil samples a shotgun library was created. Shotgun
library preparation and metagenome sequencing was performed at IMGM Laboratories
GmbH (Martinsried, Germany). The shotgun library was prepared using the
Nextera® XT Sample Preparation technology
(Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The libraries were size selected using
Agencourt® AMPure® XP
beads (Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA) with a bead to DNA ratio of 0.6 to 1
(v/v). Quality and purity of the libraries has been analyzed with the High
Sensitivity DNA Analysis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) on a
2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Prior to library
normalization the libraries were quantified using the Quant-iT™
PicoGreen® dsDNA assay kit (Invitrogen, Eugen,
OR, USA). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina
Miseq® sequencing system (Illumina, San Diego,
CA, USA) with the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) resulting
in a read length of 2 × 300 bp.
Signal processing, de-multiplexing and trimming of adapter sequences were
performed using the MiSeq® Reporter Software v.
2.3.32 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Quality processing, sequence alignment, taxonomic and functional
analysis
Quality processing was performed using the Metagenomic RAST server56. Quality processing included trimming of low quality bases with the SolexaQA
software package57 and a phred score of 30 as the lowest cutoff
for a high quality base. Subsequently artificial duplicate reads produced by
sequencing artifacts58 were removed with a k-mer based approach.
For annotation unassembled reads were aligned against the non-redundant NCBI
Reference Sequence (RefSeq) protein database using the program DIAMOND59 with a minimum percentage identity cutoff of 70% for protein
sequences and an e-value cutoff of
1 × 10−10.
The top 50 hits matching the cutoff criteria for each read were retained for
further analysis. Phylogenetic analysis was performed in MEGAN 560 using the Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA) algorithm only considering hits within
the top 1% of the best bit score and a minimum bit score of 50. The LCA
algorithm assigns species-specific sequences to specific taxa. Sequences that
are conserved among different species (e.g. as consequence of horizontal gene
transfer) will only be assigned to taxa of higher rank60.
Nonetheless, it is very difficult to directly prove that a given (de)halogenase
gene appears in a specific microbial taxon. Whenever we mention a specific
species name in the results and discussion we refer to bacteria, archaea, or
eukarya that contain a (de)halogenase gene closely related to the (de)halogenase
gene of the respective species. Functional analysis using MEGAN 5 was based on
the KEGG database and classification61. Each of the top 50 RefSeq
hits for a read was mapped to a KEGG orthology (KO) group by identifying the
best hit for a reference sequence for which a KO assignment is known. For the
final assignment of a read to a KO group the KO assignment with the highest
bitscore (best hit) of the assignments for the top 50 hits per read was
selected. Reads related to genes of halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes were
identified by analyzing reads assigned to KO groups for halogenating and
dehalogenating enzymes. Since KO groups do not cover all halogenating and
dehalogenating enzymes, we additionally aligned all reads with no hits to KEGG
against specific databases for halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes using
DIAMOND and the same cutoffs as for the RefSeq-annotation. Specific databases
were created by searching the protein databases UniProt62 and
Peroxibase63 for halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes. The
specific databases include only enzymes of organisms for which halogenation or
dehalogenation activity had been experimentally proven and published.
“Putative enzymes” were not considered. KEGG hits and
specific database hits were combined for relative abundance calculation.
Abundances of functional genes were normalized to the total number of reads in
the corresponding library and expressed as hits per million metagenomic reads.
Abundance calculations for taxonomic groups were expressed relative to the
number of all reads with a taxonomic assignment in the metagenomic library.
Sequencing reads of the 12 metagenomic libraries are publically available via
the MG-RAST metagenomic analysis server under project ID number 11442.
Statistical analysis
Statistical comparison of the abundance of functional features between the soil
horizons was performed using STAMP64 applying Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) as statistical test combined with the Tukey-Kramer method as
post-hoc test. If the p-value for the 95% confidence interval was below 0.05,
differences were considered significant. In statistical analyses each soil
horizon included the data for the forward and reverse reads of the duplicate
metagenome libraries (n = 4). To visualize differences
in gene abundance between the soil horizons row z-sores were calculated in
R65. Row z-scores represent the numbers of standard
deviations a value differs from the mean.
Results and Discussion
Geochemical potential for natural halogenation and dehalogenation
reactions
Total organiccarbon and water-leachable and therefore potentially bioavailable
carbon were highest in the Of-horizon with 301 g/kg dry soil and
619.4 mg/kg dry soil, respectively (Table
1). Water-leachable AOX was highest in the Of-horizon with
0.48 mg/kg dry soil and decreased with soil depth. The performed AOX
measurements only provide information on the water-leachable AOX-compounds.
However, it is important to note that also the non-soluble fraction of the soil
matrix contains halogenated organic compounds.
Table 1
Physical and chemical properties in the three soil horizons Of, Ah and IIP of
the Schoenbuch forest.
Horizon
Water content (%)
pH
TOC (g/kg)a
Leachable OC (mg/kg)a
Leachable AOX (mg/kg)a
Leachable Cl−
(mg/kg)a
Of
50.3
5.9
301
619.4
0.48
24.5
Ah
27.7
5.1
33
486.6
0.29
13.4
IIP
24.8
5.4
7
233.3
0.15
9.1
TOC: Total organic carbon.
OC: organic carbon.
aper kg dry soil
Soluble AOX gradients correlated with organiccarbon and chloride gradients in
the Schoenbuch soil. Especially the Of-horizon in the Schoenbuch forest was
characterized by a high content of weathering plant material. Transformation of
inorganic chloride during humification of plant material leads to the rapid
formation of stable and less volatile aromatic organohalogen compounds66. Our results support previous findings in the way that the
presence of both organiccarbon and halide ions stimulate natural halogenation
and dehalogenation reactions in soil and that elevated organic matter contents
accelerates chlorination rates67.
Formation of volatile organohalogens in soil microcosm
experiments
Besides AOX we followed the natural formation of volatile organohalogen compounds
(VOX) in soil from the Schoenbuch forest. We observed the formation of
chloroform (CHCl3) and bromoform (CHBr3) in soil
microcosms after 1 h of incubation (Fig. 2).
Highest VOX concentrations were observed for the Of-horizon with
2.8 ± 0.2 and
3.4 ± 0.3 μg/kg dry
soil for chloroform and bromoform, respectively.
Figure 2
Emissions of chloroform (CHCl3) and bromoform (CHBr3)
from microcosms with Schoenbuch forest soil from the three horizons Of, Ah and
IIP after 1 h of incubation.
The control contained only sterile incubation solution (no soil). Error bars
indicate the standard deviation of three independent measurements.
n.d. = not detected.
Soils are a known natural source of chloroform2268. Furthermore
it was demonstrated that in presence of inorganic bromide the formation of
bromoform in soil is detectable69. In all three soil horizons of
the Schoenbuch forest bromide could not be detected by ion chromatography.
However, the formation of bromoform was observed in the OF- and Ah-horizon
suggesting the presence of sufficient amounts of bromide for microbial bromoform
formation. Especially soils with high organiccarbon content due to decaying
plant material and a rich humic layer were prominent sources for chloroform68. This was confirmed for the Schoenbuch forest soil, from which
the emissions of trihalomethanes were highest in the organic rich Of-horizon. A
recent study on chloroform formation from humic substances in soils using stable
isotope analysis suggested microbial formation via extracellular
chloroperoxidases as potential source of VOX formation70. The
predominance of microbial chlorination over abiotic chlorination reactions in
forest soils was demonstrated by a clear temperature sensitivity of the observed
chlorination reactions29 and the significantly lower chlorination
of organic matter in autoclaved and/or gamma sterilized soils30.
Also microcosm studies on microbial dehalogenation revealed that both, anaerobic
dehalogenation32 and aerobic dehalogenation33
of organohalogen compounds by microorganisms prevailed over abiotic reactions in
the investigated soils. Both microbial halogenation and dehalogenation reactions
in soils contribute to the natural halogen cycling, but so far the diversity and
abundance of the involved microorganisms and enzymes have not been studied in
great detail2728. Since soluble and volatile organohalogen
compounds were detectable in incubation experiments with Schoenbuch forest soil
we used a shotgun metagenomic sequencing approach to investigate the genetic
potential for microbial halogenation and dehalogenation reactions.
General information on the Schoenbuch metagenome
Metagenomic sequencing of two replicate samples per soil horizon resulted in a
total of 38.8 million reads with a read length of 300 bp. After
quality processing a total of 36.2 million high quality reads were used for
taxonomic and functional analysis. Detailed sequencing statistics for the
metagenome libraries of the duplicate soil samples are given in Table S1. Taxonomic classification was
possible for 20.4% of the metagenomic reads, whereas functional annotation was
possible for 8.5% of the reads. Since our study focuses on the microbial halogen
cycle only sequences related to Bacteria, Archaea or Fungi were considered in
our analysis. Of the reads that could be taxonomically assigned 99.5% were
related to Bacteria, whereas 0.1% and 0.4% were related to Archaea and Fungi,
respectively. The higher relative abundance of Bacteria over Archaea was
confirmed by quantifying 16S rRNA gene copy numbers of both domains by qPCR
(results shown in Table S2). 16S
rRNA gene copy numbers in the three soil horizons were approximately three
orders of magnitude higher for bacterial 16S rRNA genes compared to archaeal 16S
rRNA genes. However, 16S rRNA gene copy numbers were not corrected for ribosomal
rRNA gene operon numbers. Strong predominance of bacterial over archaeal reads
in soil metagenomic libraries has also been demonstrated in a cross-metagenomic
survey of 16 different soil samples71 and metagenomics analyses
of permafrost soils72. Bacterial reads in the Schoenbuch forest
soil metagenome were mainly related to the Proteobacteria
(47.2–50.5%) and Acidobacteria (21.4–24.0%)
(Fig. 3). Further, reads affiliated to
Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Verrucomicrobia
constituted considerable fractions of all bacterial reads.
Figure 3
Mean proportion of bacterial phyla in the three soil horizons Of, Ah and
IIP.
Relative percentages were calculated for all reads assigned to the domain
Bacteria. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean for the
forward and reverse metagenomic read libraries of duplicate samples for each
soil horizon (n = 4).
The dominant bacterial phyla in the Schoenbuch forest soil are typical members of
soil microbial communities and represented the majority of the bacterial reads
in metagenomes of e.g. desert and forest soils71, tallgrass
prairie soils73 and a boreal forest soil74.
Functional metagenomic reads were mainly associated with the KEGG subsystem
metabolism (43.9–45.2%) or could not directly be grouped within one
of the KEGG subsystems (29.2–29.9%) (Figure S1).
Identification of microorganisms and enzymes possibly involved in natural
halogen cycling in Schoenbuch forest soil
We screened the metagenome for microorganisms that are known to possess genes
encoding for enzymes that perform halogenation or dehalogenation reactions or
for which halogenation and dehalogenation reactions have been confirmed by
experimental approaches (Table 2). Relative abundances
of these taxa were calculated on the genus rank, since taxonomic classification
at the species or strain level is not reliable for short metagenomic reads.
Table 2
Mean abundance of taxa known to possess enzymes for biotic halogenation or
dehalogenation reactions.
Genus
Group
Halo
Dehalo
Relative abundance
(%)
Of
Ah
IIP
Bradyrhizobium
Bacteria
x
x
10.381
12.549
9.038
Candidatus Solibacter
Bacteria
x
3.673
4.872
5.604
Sphingomonas
Bacteria
x
1.597
0.501
0.355
Burkholderia
Bacteria
x
x
1.499
1.505
1.490
Mycobacterium
Bacteria
x
x
1.002
1.122
0.742
Mesorhizobium
Bacteria
x
0.778
1.066
0.860
Pseudomonas
Bacteria
x
x
0.574
0.469
0.525
Rhizobium
Bacteria
x
0.566
0.839
0.727
Streptomyces
Bacteria
x
0.497
0.616
0.906
Rhodopseudomonas
Bacteria
x
x
0.447
0.485
0.356
Methylobacterium
Bacteria
x
0.370
0.553
0.422
Cupriavidus
Bacteria
x
0.271
0.294
0.355
Polaromonas
Bacteria
x
0.240
0.149
0.166
Nocardioides
Bacteria
x
0.222
0.063
0.070
Hyphomicrobium
Bacteria
x
0.175
0.203
0.163
Actinoplanes
Bacteria
x
0.160
0.119
0.139
Myxococcus
Bacteria
x
0.137
0.131
0.185
Ralstonia
Bacteria
x
0.129
0.137
0.212
Sinorhizobium
Bacteria
x
0.114
0.218
0.180
Rhodococcus
Bacteria
x
x
0.109
0.117
0.171
Geobacter
Bacteria
x
0.101
0.182
0.377
Rhodospirillum
Bacteria
x
0.099
0.134
0.109
Methylosinus
Bacteria
x
0.094
0.179
0.121
Desulfovibrio
Bacteria
x
0.093
0.126
0.188
Amycolatopsis
Bacteria
x
0.093
0.114
0.165
Xanthobacter
Bacteria
x
0.081
0.111
0.090
Nitrosomonas
Bacteria
x
0.046
0.045
0.072
Clostridium
Bacteria
x
0.043
0.042
0.063
Ancylobacter
Bacteria
x
0.030
0.034
0.027
Salinispora
Bacteria
x
0.026
0.035
0.051
Desulfuromonas
Bacteria
x
0.022
0.036
0.070
Oscillatoria
Bacteria
x
0.019
0.028
0.040
Desulfomonile
Bacteria
x
0.019
0.044
0.076
Nostoc
Bacteria
x
0.018
0.024
0.041
Methylococcus
Bacteria
x
0.017
0.023
0.032
Corynebacterium
Bacteria
x
0.015
0.017
0.018
Shewanella
Bacteria
x
0.015
0.014
0.014
Nonomuraea
Bacteria
x
0.015
0.022
0.038
Anabaena
Bacteria
x
0.009
0.015
0.026
Microscilla
Bacteria
x
0.008
0.003
0.003
Lactobacillus
Bacteria
x
0.008
0.008
0.011
Synechocystis
Bacteria
x
0.008
0.011
0.018
Leisingera
Bacteria
x
0.008
0.010
0.010
Psychroflexus
Bacteria
x
0.006
0.002
0.001
Lechevalieria
Bacteria
x
0.006
0.008
0.013
Dehalobacter
Bacteria
x
0.005
0.004
0.005
Desulfitobacterium
Bacteria
x
0.004
0.004
0.006
Lyngbya
Bacteria
x
0.004
0.007
0.010
Dehalococcoides
Bacteria
x
0.004
0.004
0.010
Gramella
Bacteria
x
0.003
0.002
0.002
Actinosynnema
Bacteria
x
0.003
0.003
0.004
Moraxella
Bacteria
x
0.001
0.002
0.001
Sulfurospirillum
Bacteria
x
0.001
0.002
0.002
Acetobacterium
Bacteria
x
0.001
0.001
0.001
Weissella
Bacteria
x
0.000
0.000
0.001
Pediococcus
Bacteria
x
0.000
0.001
0.000
Methanosarcina
Archaea
x
0.007
0.008
0.016
Aspergillus
Fungi
x
0.011
0.004
0.003
Laccaria
Fungi
x
0.011
0.011
0.002
Agaricus
Fungi
x
0.007
0.007
0.003
Batrachochytrium
Fungi
x
0.007
0.003
0.002
Coprinopsis
Fungi
x
0.005
0.007
0.002
Auricularia
Fungi
x
0.005
0.002
0.001
Thielavia
Fungi
x
0.003
0.001
0.000
Podospora
Fungi
x
0.002
0.001
0.001
Neurospora
Fungi
x
0.001
0.000
0.000
Magnaporthe
Fungi
x
0.001
0.000
0.000
Ustilago
Fungi
x
0.001
0.001
0.000
Relative abundances are given on the genus level. Dehalo:
Genus comprises species with genetic dehalogenation
potential. Halo: Genus comprises species with genetic
halogenation potential. Some genera contain species that
possess the genetic potential to perform both halogenation
and dehalogenation reactions.
Bradyrhizobium and Burkholderia were the most abundant genera
possessing genes for both, halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes. With the
exception of eleven fungal genera and one archaeal genus all other genera
belonged to the Bacteria indicating that halogen cycling might be mainly
bacteria driven in the investigated forest soil. Most taxa in Table 2 are facultative aerobic microorganisms suggesting the
prevalence of aerobic halogenation and dehalogenation pathways. Anaerobic
bacteria known for reductive dehalogenation such as Dehalococcoides or
Dehalobacter were less abundant, probably because the top
40 cm of the Schoenbuch forest soil were mainly oxic. Nonetheless,
anoxic microsites in water filled micropores could sustain growth and activity
of reductively dehalogenating microorganisms even in primarily oxic soil
horizons.In order to assess the genetic potential for microbial halogenation and
dehalogenation reactions in the Schoenbuch forest soil, we tried to identify
reads that encode for halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes. Their relative
abundances in the metagenomic libraries of the duplicate samples of each soil
horizon are displayed in Fig. 4. The applied metagenomic
approach revealed a high genetic diversity for halogenating and dehalogenating
enzymes covering a variety of different halogenation and dehalogenation
mechanisms. Most retrieved halogenase genes encoded for enzymes with oxidative
halogenation mechanisms. Also Vaillancourt et al. described that
oxidative halogenation pathways predominate in many ecosystems37.
Furthermore experiments on the chlorination of organic matter in forest soils
suggested oxygen-dependent enzymes driving the biotic chlorination in soils29. For dehalogenating enzymes a variety of oxidative and reductive
dehalogenation reactions are known. The majority of the dehalogenase genes we
found in the Schoenbuch soil metagenome were related to hydrolytic or oxidative
dehalogenases31. The only reductive dehalogenase genes we
identified were related to a pceA gene encoding for a reductive
dehalogenase that catalyses the dechlorination of perchloroethene and
trichloroethene75. The relative abundances of the most
abundant halogenase and dehalogenase genes were in the same order of magnitude
as functional genes involved in microbial nitrogen cycling (nosZ,
nif-genes) or housekeeping genes such as e.g. DNA or RNA polymerases.
The fact that halogenase and dehalogenase genes occurred at relative abundances
similar to essential soil microbial community functions emphasizes the
importance of these enzymes for (de)halogenation reactions in forest soils and
suggests a major role of bacteria in the cycling of halogens in soils.
Figure 4
Heatmap summarizing the relative abundance of reads annotated as halogenase
and dehalogenase genes in the metagenomic libraries of the replicate soil
samples.
The relative abundance of genes of the nitrogen cycle and of selected
housekeeping genes is given as reference. Functional assignments are based
on 70% amino acid sequence identity and an e-value of
1 × 10−10.
The color code represents the row z-score, the number of standard deviations
a value differs from the mean. Numeric values within the heatmap represent
the relative abundance in hits per million metagenomic reads. In samples
with a relative abundance of 0.0 no reads for the corresponding enzyme were
found.
The heatmap in Fig. 4 shows that the relative abundances of
halogenase and dehalogenase genes in the two replicate metagenomic libraries
were in the same order of magnitude and follow the same trends with soil depth.
Therefore, we combined the data of both libraries for further analysis. The
variance between the replicate libraries is then reflected by the given standard
deviation.We verified the relative abundances of selected halogenase, dehalogenase and
reference genes involved in nitrogen cycling in the different soils horizons of
the metagenome data set by qPCR. For the four selected genes (the haloalkane
dehalogenase gene dhaA of Mycobacterium smegmatis, the
flavin-dependent halogenase gene prnA of Pseudomonas fluorescens,
nosZ, and, nifH) qPCR results confirmed the observed trends in
relative read abundances across the different soil horizons (Table S3).Of major interest with respect to halogenating enzymes is the proportion of genes
encoding for either specific or unspecific halogenases. Genes for unspecific
halogenases represented 86.7–93.5% of the total halogenase reads
whereas genes for specific halogenases represented 6.5–13.3% (Fig. 5A). Unspecific halogenases increased significantly
with sediment depth although differences between the Ah- and IIP-horizon were
not significant. All unspecific halogenases were haloperoxidases. The higher
proportion of unspecific halogenases in the deeper soil horizons might be
related to their ability of reducing hydrogen peroxide to water. The rhizosphere
at the sampling site was located at the intersection of the Ah- and IIP-horizon.
Also the high abundance of nitrogen fixation genes (nif-genes) locates
the rhizosphere near the IIP-horizon (Fig. 4).
Haloperoxidases could be used by microorganisms as defence against oxidative
stress induced by reactive oxygen species released by plants to antagonize
pathogens and rhizosphere infections76. Specific halogenases such
as flavin-dependent halogenases are involved in secondary metabolism, e.g.
antibiotic synthesis40. 16S rRNA gene copy numbers and organiccarbon content were highest in the Of-horizon suggesting that microbial
competition and the necessity for production of antimicrobial agents might be
high in this soil layer. This might also be a potential explanation for the high
proportion of specific halogenase genes in the Of-horizon. The proportion of
genes for metabolic dehalogenases significantly increased with soil depth.
Metabolic dehalogenases constituted the major fraction of all dehalogenase
assigned reads (59.5–71.7%), while genes encoding for cometabolic
dehalogenases were less abundant (28.9–40.5%) (Fig.
5B). Many metabolic and cometabolic dehalogenases have a broad
substrate specificity, e.g. the methane monooxygenases or haloalkane
dehalogenases31.
Figure 5
Proportion of reads for specific and unspecific halogenases (A) or
metabolic and cometabolic dehalogenases (B) in the three soil
horizons. (C) Ratio of halogenase and dehalogenase gene abundance in
the soil horizons. A ratio of 1 represents an equal abundance and a ratio
below 1 a higher abundance of dehalogenase genes. Horizons were compared
using ANOVA and statistical significant differences are marked by asterisks
(*p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01,
***p < 0.001). x indicates no
significant differences (p > 0.05).
Only comparisons for adjacent soil horizons are shown.
Microorganisms using organohalogens as carbon source or electron acceptor are
therefore not necessarily restricted by the availability of their primary
substrate for their dehalogenating enzymes. This makes correlations between the
abundance of dehalogenase genes and specific organohalogens formed during
microbial halogenation reactions difficult. The relative proportion of
cometabolic dehalogenases was highest in the Of-horizon. These enzymes utilize
non-halogenated organic compounds as substrate and since the Of-horizon had the
highest content of organiccarbon, this might explain that organisms possessing
monooxygenases or dioxygenases are abundant in this horizon, where they can
utilize the available aromatic compounds, e.g. phenolic breakdown products of
lignin degradation77. The ratio of halogenase to dehalogenase
genes (Fig. 5C) revealed a higher abundance of
dehalogenase genes in all soil horizons, whereas the ratio was closest to 1 in
the Of-horizon (0.71). The observed ratio only displays the genetic potential
for enzymatic halogenation or dehalogenation. Since gene expression and protein
synthesis are dependent on many factors and differ strongly between different
genes the relative abundance of functional genes in metagenomic datasets is no
indicator of the importance of a certain function or activity in a given sample.
However, since we quantified the net release of chloroform in all laboratory
soil microcosms, chloroform formation must have been higher than chloroform
degradation in all soil horizons.For each halogenase and dehalogenase subgroup as classified in Fig. 4 we further investigated the distribution of the most abundant
subgroup within the soil profiles. The most abundant unspecific dehalogenases
were the non-heme, no metal chloroperoxidases (Fig. 6A)
with 93.6–99.0 hits per million reads. No significant differences in
abundance between the three soil horizons were detected. In general
chloroperoxidases oxidize halides in the presence of hydrogen peroxide to the
corresponding hypohalous acid, responsible for the unspecific halogenation of
electron-rich organic matter78. The non-heme, no metal
chloroperoxidases also use hydrogen peroxide for their halogenation
mechanism79. These enzymes are also referred to as
perhydrolases and show like the heme- or vanadium containing chloroperoxidases
no substrate specificity36. Therefore, a role in synthesis of
specific compounds can be excluded. It was hypothesized that chloroperoxidases
might be involved in microbial antagonism through the production of reactive
chlorine species as antimicrobial agents80. As mentioned above
the ability to reduce hydrogen peroxide to water suggests a role in oxidative
stress response by microorganisms associated with the rhizosphere of plants.
Many plant-associated organisms, e.g. Sinorhizobium meliloti81, possess non-heme, no metal chloroperoxidases76.
Due to their reaction mechanism it is likely that chloroperoxidases are involved
in the formation of chloroform in soils5170. The high abundance
of genes for chloroperoxidases in the Schoenbuch forest soil might be a possible
explanation for the observed formation of chloroform in our microcosm
experiments. Since chloroperoxidases can also use bromide37,
these enyzmes might also play a role in the formation of bromoform.
Figure 6
Abundance in hits per million metagenomic reads of non-heme, no metal
chloroperoxidase genes (A), flavin-dependent halogenase genes
(prnA) (B), haloalkane dehalogenase genes (C) and
methane monooxygenase genes (D). The four enzymes are the most
abundant representatives of unspecific and specific halogenases and
metabolic and cometabolic dehalogenases, respectively. Horizons were
compared using ANOVA and statistical significant differences are marked by
asterisks (*p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01,
***p < 0.001). x indicates no
significant differences (p > 0.05).
Only comparisons for adjacent soil horizons are displayed.
Halogenase genes such as the flavin-dependent halogenase prnA were the most
abundant specific halogenases in the dataset. The Of-horizon revealed a
significantly higher abundance of prnA genes (13.6 hits per million
metagenomic reads) compared to the Ah and IIP-horizon (Fig.
6B). The prnA gene encodes for a tryptophan-7 halogenase which
is together with a second flavin-dependent halogenase (prnC) involved in the
biosynthesis of the antifungal antibiotic pyrrolnitrin40. As
discussed above the role of the PrnA enzyme in antibiotic synthesis might
explain the higher abundance of the prnA gene in the Of-horizon. The
carbon content, bacterial and archaeal cell numbers (as approximated by 16S rRNA
gene copy numbers), and the abundance of fungal metagenomic reads were highest
in the Of-horizon. Therefore this soil horizon might constitute a microbial
habitat in which the genetic potential for the production of antimicrobials
could provide a competitive advantage which might explain the increased
abundance of genes involved in synthesis of an antifungal antibiotic such as
pyrrolnitrin.The abundance of haloalkane dehalogenase genes was highest in the IIP-horizon
(98.0 hits per million reads) and decreased significantly in the Ah- and
Of-horizon (p < 0.001) (Fig. 6C). Haloalkane dehalogenases are hydrolytic dehalogenases and
have a broad substrate spectrum including various chlorinated and brominated
aliphatic compounds82. The IIP-horizon was characterized by the
lowest soluble AOX content which might be indicative of active dehalogenation
mechanisms, also suggested by the high genetic potential for metabolic
dehalogenation reactions in the IIP-horizon. The lower emissions of chloroform
and the absence of bromoform formation in soil from the IIP-horizon could be due
to an elevated activity of dehalogenating enzymes involved in the degradation of
chloroform and bromoform.Methane monooxygenase genes represented the most prominent genes among the
cometabolic dehalogenases (Fig. 6D). Their abundance was
highest in the IIP-horizon (15.8 hits per million reads). Comparison between
directly adjacent horizons revealed no significant differences in abundance but
the difference in abundance between the Oh- and IIP-horizon was significant
(p < 0.01). Methanotrophs primarily
use methane monooxygenases to catalyze the oxidation of methane to methanol but
the enzyme can also oxidize a wide range of alkanes and alkenes83. Methane monooxygenases are also known for cometabolic oxidation of
halogenated alkenes84 and alkanes such as chloroform85. The high abundance of methane monooxygenase genes in the
IIP-horizon suggests the occurrence of high numbers of methanotrophic bacteria
in this soil horizon. Following rainfalls parts of the IIP-horizon might quickly
turn anoxic which could promote methanogenesis and the activity of methanotrophs
in oxic zones since activities of methanotrophic bacteria and methanogenic
archaea in soil are known to be correlated86.
Summary and Outlook
The microbial mechanisms driving the halogen cycle in soils are mainly unknown.
Therefore knowledge on formation and degradation processes is important to evaluate
the role of soils as sinks or sources of organohalogen compounds87.
The metagenomic survey conducted in this study revealed a tremendous diversity and
high abundance of genes encoding for halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes in the
investigated soil. Although we did not analyze gene expression or enzyme activity we
could show that the studied forest soil harbours the genetic potential for specific
and unspecific halogenation as well as metabolic and cometabolic dehalogenation
activities with a clear predominance of oxidative bacterial reaction pathways.
However, the relative contribution of the different enzymatic groups to the overall
cycling of organic and inorganichalogens in the Schoenbuch requires further study.
Here we demonstrated that metagenomics allows for the identification of the
diversity and relative abundance of enzymatic halogenating and dehalogenating
reaction mechanisms in soils that build the basis for further investigation of
microbial halogen cycling. Since halogenating and dehalogenating enzymes use
different reaction mechanisms for the (de)halogenation of organic matter the
contribution of individual enzymatic mechanisms to overall halogen cycling should be
further elucidated by stable chlorine isotope fractionation as recently
demonstrated7088. The combination of omics approaches,
laboratory microcosm experiments, and stable isotope analysis constitutes a powerful
set of tools to further investigate the microbial contribution to natural
halogenation and dehalogenation reactions in soils.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Weigold, P. et al. A metagenomic-based survey
of microbial (de)halogenation potential in a German forest soil. Sci. Rep.
6, 28958; doi: 10.1038/srep28958 (2016).
Authors: Katie A Read; Anoop S Mahajan; Lucy J Carpenter; Mathew J Evans; Bruno V E Faria; Dwayne E Heard; James R Hopkins; James D Lee; Sarah J Moller; Alastair C Lewis; Luis Mendes; James B McQuaid; Hilke Oetjen; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; Michael J Pilling; John M C Plane Journal: Nature Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Daniel H Huson; Suparna Mitra; Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh; Nico Weber; Stephan C Schuster Journal: Genome Res Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Vinayak Agarwal; Zachary D Miles; Jaclyn M Winter; Alessandra S Eustáquio; Abrahim A El Gamal; Bradley S Moore Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Cintia P J Rua; Louisi S de Oliveira; Adriana Froes; Diogo A Tschoeke; Ana Carolina Soares; Luciana Leomil; Gustavo B Gregoracci; Ricardo Coutinho; Eduardo Hajdu; Cristiane C Thompson; Roberto G S Berlinck; Fabiano L Thompson Journal: Microb Ecol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 4.552
Authors: Siavash Atashgahi; Martin G Liebensteiner; Dick B Janssen; Hauke Smidt; Alfons J M Stams; Detmer Sipkema Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Yi Yang; Robert Sanford; Jun Yan; Gao Chen; Natalie L Cápiro; Xiuying Li; Frank E Löffler Journal: mSystems Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 6.496