Fan Shi1, Ping He1, Quinn A Best1, Kirsten Groome1, Milton L Truong2, Aaron M Coffey2, Greg Zimay1, Roman V Shchepin2, Kevin W Waddell2, Eduard Y Chekmenev3, Boyd M Goodson4. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Materials Technology Center, Southern Illinois University , Carbondale, Illinois 62901, United States. 2. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science , Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States. 3. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States; Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 14, Moscow, 119991, Russia. 4. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Materials Technology Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, United States; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Materials Technology Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, United States.
Abstract
Two synthetic strategies are investigated for the preparation of water-soluble iridium-based catalysts for NMR signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE). In one approach, PEGylation of a variant N-heterocyclic carbene provided a novel catalyst with excellent water solubility. However, while SABRE-active in ethanol solutions, the catalyst lost activity in >50% water. In a second approach, synthesis of a novel di-iridium complex precursor where the cyclooctadiene (COD) rings have been replaced by CODDA (1,2-dihydroxy-3,7-cyclooctadiene) leads to the creation of a catalyst [IrCl(CODDA)IMes] that can be dissolved and activated in water-enabling aqueous SABRE in a single step, without need for either an organic cosolvent or solvent removal followed by aqueous reconstitution. The potential utility of the CODDA catalyst for aqueous SABRE is demonstrated with the ∼(-)32-fold enhancement of 1H signals of pyridine in water with only 1 atm of parahydrogen.
Two synthetic strategies are investigated for the preparation of water-soluble iridium-based catalysts for NMR signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE). In one approach, PEGylation of a variant N-heterocycliccarbene provided a novel catalyst with excellent water solubility. However, while SABRE-active in ethanol solutions, the catalyst lost activity in >50% water. In a second approach, synthesis of a novel di-iridium complex precursor where the cyclooctadiene (COD) rings have been replaced by CODDA (1,2-dihydroxy-3,7-cyclooctadiene) leads to the creation of a catalyst [IrCl(CODDA)IMes] that can be dissolved and activated in water-enabling aqueous SABRE in a single step, without need for either an organic cosolvent or solvent removal followed by aqueous reconstitution. The potential utility of the CODDA catalyst for aqueous SABRE is demonstrated with the ∼(-)32-fold enhancement of 1H signals of pyridine in water with only 1 atm of parahydrogen.
Because of their inherent
advantages (including high spatiotemporal
resolution, lack of ionizing radiation, and the ability to spectrally
distinguish multiple signal sources), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based
molecular imaging[1,2] techniques promise to revolutionize
clinical imaging—from the screening and diagnosis of disease,
to the assessment of treatment response. However, the inherently low
detection sensitivity of conventional magnetic resonance techniques
makes it challenging to detect and track low-concentration species
in vivo, such as gas species in lung spaces or metabolic biomarkers
in blood or other tissues. Hyperpolarization[3] techniques like dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (d-DNP),[4,5] spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP),[6,7] and parahydrogen
induced polarization (PHIP)[8,9] offer the possibility
of overcoming the problem of low agent concentration by increasing
the nuclear spin polarization—and hence MR signal—by
several orders of magnitude.Signal amplification by reversible
exchange (SABRE)[10] is a relatively new
hyperpolarization technique
pioneered by Duckett, Green, and co-workers in 2009.[11,12] In SABRE, an organometallic catalyst is used to colocate a molecular
substrate to be hyperpolarized and parahydrogen (pH2)—a
source of pure nuclear spin order. Like traditional PHIP,[8,9,13−19] SABRE is of interest because it is cost-effective, potentially continuous,
scalable, and rapid (achieving polarization enhancement in seconds).[10−12,20−40] However, unlike traditional PHIP, SABRE does not require permanent
alteration of the substrate to hyperpolarize it.[11] Since its inception, considerable effort has been put forth
to broaden the applicability of SABRE by investigating alternative
catalyst structures,[21,28,41−45] improving the nuclear spin polarization achieved for protons[34,46] and various heteronuclei[30,32,47−50] (including through the application of variable applied DC and AC
fields), demonstrating high-resolution imaging[25,50] (including at low magnetic field[51]),
widening the range of amenable substrate types,[36] achieving enhancement in the limits of both low-[29,52] and high-concentration[49] agents (including
in complex mixtures[20]), and demonstrating
SABRE with (and separation/reuse of) heterogeneous microscale/nanoscale
catalysts.[53,54]Other efforts have concerned
the extension of SABRE to aqueous
environments. Because of the poor aqueous solubility of the “standard”
SABRE catalyst ([IrCl(COD) (IMes)],[46,55,56] where “COD” = cyclooctadiene and “IMes”
= 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene), recent promising
efforts have relied on organic cosolvents to achieve SABRE in aqueous/organic
mixtures[34,45,50,57] However, in other previous work we recently found
that the chemical changes that accompany this catalyst’s activation
also endow it with water solubility;[57] following
activation, the organic solvent may be completely removed and the
activated catalyst can be subsequently reconstituted in deuterated
water to achieve SABRE enhancement.Here we report our efforts
to develop novel homogeneous catalysts
that may lead to improved SABRE in aqueous environments, without the
need for separate catalyst activation, organic solvent removal, or
subsequent aqueous reconstitution.[58,59] Two different
strategies were utilized to alter the structure—and hence aqueous
solubility—of the original standard catalyst by targeting either
the N-heterocycliccarbene moiety or the COD group,
respectively (Figure ). For the former, PEGylation[60] of a variant
of the aromatic carbene moiety provided much greater aqueous solubility
for the catalyst (“7”); however, while
that catalyst is SABRE-active in ethanol solutions, it lost activity
in >50% water. For the latter, synthesis of a di-iridium complex
precursor
where the COD rings have been replaced by CODDA (1,2-dihydroxy-3,7-cyclooctadiene)
permits creation of a catalyst [IrCl(CODDA)IMes] (“13”) that can be dissolved and activated in water, enabling
aqueous SABRE in a single step without need for any organic cosolvent.
The potential utility of the CODDA catalyst for aqueous SABRE is demonstrated
with the ∼(−)32-fold enhancement of 1H signals
of pyridine in water with only 1 atm of pH2. Taken together,
these results aid the evaluation of different synthetic approaches
for aqueous SABRE that, when improved and combined with other approaches,
should help enable a wide range of biological, biomedical, and in
vivo spectroscopic and imaging experiments.
Figure 1
Relevant structures for
studying SABRE in aqueous environments
in the present work, pre (7, 13, and 16) and post (14 and 15) activation
in the presence of H2 gas and pyridine (py) substrate. 16 is the “traditional” Ir/IMes SABRE catalyst
in its preactivated form, whereas 7 and 13 are the water-soluble PEGylated and cyclooctadiene-diol (“CODDA”)
variants, respectively (the numbering of the above structures is explained
in the Supporting Information Figures S1
and S2, which, respectively, summarize the synthesis of structures 7 and 13).
Relevant structures for
studying SABRE in aqueous environments
in the present work, pre (7, 13, and 16) and post (14 and 15) activation
in the presence of H2 gas and pyridine (py) substrate. 16 is the “traditional” Ir/IMes SABRE catalyst
in its preactivated form, whereas 7 and 13 are the water-soluble PEGylated and cyclooctadiene-diol (“CODDA”)
variants, respectively (the numbering of the above structures is explained
in the Supporting Information Figures S1
and S2, which, respectively, summarize the synthesis of structures 7 and 13).
Results and Discussion
Exploring SABRE with the PEGylated Catalyst
The PEGylated
catalyst 7 was examined to determine its efficacy for
SABRE in organic and aqueous environments. SABRE experiments were
performed by bubbling pH2 thoroughly into the NMR tube
while located outside of the magnet (“low-field”), followed
by immediate transfer of the sample into the 9.4 T NMR magnet for
“high-field” detection of enhanced 1H NMR
spectra. The catalyst was activated via pH2 bubbling in
the presence of excess substrate prior to use in SABRE experiments,
and the low mixing field was somewhat variable (∼11 ±
5 mT) and was not systematically optimized. Enhancements were recorded
for the test substrate pyridine (py); results for all of the experiments
described in this work are summarized in Table .
Table 1
Polarization Enhancement
(ε)
Values for Three Aromatic Proton Sites of Pyridine Observed with Different
Catalysts in Aqueous and Nonaqueous Environmentsa
catalyst
solvent
ε (Ho)
ε (Hp)
ε (Hm)
7
100% d6-ethanol
–42
–57
–11
7
100% d6-ethanol
–45
–61
–11
7
13% D2O/87% d6-ethanol
–37
–27
–12
7
13% D2O/87% d6-ethanol
–38
–31
–14
7
43% D2O/57% d6-ethanol
–9.5
–5.7
–1.3
7
43% D2O/57% d6-ethanol
–7.3
–4.9
–0.4
7
63% D2O/37% d6-ethanol
∼0
∼0
∼0
13
100% D2O
–25
–19
–11
13
100% D2O
–32
–25
–16
16
100% D2O
∼0
∼0
∼0
Reported
ε values are calculated
from spectral integrals and are approximate, with estimated uncertainties
of ∼10%. Results from the top two acquisitions for each condition
are reported.
Reported
ε values are calculated
from spectral integrals and are approximate, with estimated uncertainties
of ∼10%. Results from the top two acquisitions for each condition
are reported.In an early
set of experiments (not shown), bubbling pH2 at atmospheric
pressure gave up to ∼16-fold enhancements
for the 1H NMR signals of py in 100% d6-ethanol. The addition of D2O to d4-methanol solutions had lower enhancements than d6-ethanol, with ∼20% D2O/∼80% d4-methanol yielding only ∼6-fold 1H signal enhancements. Higher volume fractions (e.g., 50/50)
of D2O in d4-methanol resulted
in no observable SABRE enhancements under these conditions.The lower SABRE enhancements in solutions with increasing water
fractions were originally rationalized by the ∼15-fold lower
solubility of H2 gas in water compared to that in alcohol-based
solvents.[61] To mitigate the H2 solubility limitation of aqueous solutions, the apparatus was altered
to allow pH2 pressures of up to ∼60 psi positive
pressure (∼5.1 atm total H2 pressure). Bubbling
pH2 at 60 psi into a sample containing 100% d6-ethanol, ∼3.5 mM of the catalyst 7, and 35 mM py gave rise to ∼40–60-fold enhancement
of the 1H NMR signal from the substrate (e.g., Figure b) compared to the
signal acquired at thermal equilibrium (Figure a; the conventional SABRE catalyst 16 is also effective in 100% d6-ethanol[57]). Little dependence on temperature
was observed, with similar enhancements attained when the temperature
was raised from 301 to 321 K.
Figure 2
SABRE studies with the PEGylated Ir catalyst
(7/14) in 100% deuterated ethanol. (a) Thermally
polarized reference 1H NMR scan from the solution following
activation with pH2 in the presence of excess substrate
(py); the spectrum is
vertically scaled 5-fold compared to panel b, which shows the successful
observation of SABRE enhancement after 1 min of bubbling with ∼5.1
atm of pH2 at ∼11 mT, then transfer to 9.39 T for
high-field acquisition; enhancements up to ∼40–60-fold
were observed with 3.5 mM catalyst and the given conditions. Panels
c and d show spectra from a separate experiment, where no high-field
SABRE effect was observed, i.e., where pH2 bubbling/SABRE
mixing was performed entirely at 9.39 T (d), compared to a corresponding
thermally polarized spectrum (c). (Vertical scale for panels c and
d is different from that of panels a and b.) Insets show amplified
hydride regions from spectra in panels b and d, respectively.
SABRE studies with the PEGylated Ir catalyst
(7/14) in 100% deuterated ethanol. (a) Thermally
polarized reference 1H NMR scan from the solution following
activation with pH2 in the presence of excess substrate
(py); the spectrum is
vertically scaled 5-fold compared to panel b, which shows the successful
observation of SABRE enhancement after 1 min of bubbling with ∼5.1
atm of pH2 at ∼11 mT, then transfer to 9.39 T for
high-field acquisition; enhancements up to ∼40–60-fold
were observed with 3.5 mM catalyst and the given conditions. Panels
c and d show spectra from a separate experiment, where no high-field
SABRE effect was observed, i.e., where pH2 bubbling/SABRE
mixing was performed entirely at 9.39 T (d), compared to a corresponding
thermally polarized spectrum (c). (Vertical scale for panels c and
d is different from that of panels a and b.) Insets show amplified
hydride regions from spectra in panels b and d, respectively.Next, no SABRE enhancement was
observed when pH2 was
bubbled in at high field (9.39 T; Figure , parts c and d), unlike the case with the
“standard” NHC-Ir catalyst, 16.[24,57] Also unlike the case with 16, no strong, purely absorptive
signal at ∼(−)22.8 ppm is observed from magnetically
equivalent hyperpolarized hydride spins on the activated catalyst
structure. Instead, the hydride region exhibits two relatively weak
dispersive doublets at ca. −22.2 and ∼−23.1 ppm.
These dispersive signals are reminiscent of the enhanced hydride resonances
from organometallic catalysts explored previously with PHIP (e.g.,
RhH2(PPh3)3Cl[13]) and, thus, are tentatively assigned to the two hydride
sites on the activated catalyst (14) rendered effectively
inequivalent by the broken symmetry of the PEGylated N-heterocycliccarbene. A pair of additional, much weaker dispersive
signals (at ca. −22.6 and −25.9 ppm) likely arise from
inequivalent hydride sites on a similar structure to 14 originating from a different chemical pathway. The absence of a
high-field SABRE effect is likely a combination of inefficient conversion
of spin order from pH2 at high field and the lack of strong z-magnetization of the hydride spins, and is consistent
with the current picture for the high-field SABRE mechanism—cross-relaxation
akin to the spin-polarization induced nuclear Overhauser effect.[24,57,62,63]As shown in Figure , parts a and b, modest aqueous fractions (∼13% v/v)
had only
a minor negative effect on SABRE enhancement (maximum |ε| ∼
40). Here, the concentration of D2O is already orders of
magnitude higher than the concentrations of the catalyst and substrate.
Bringing the water fraction to nearly 1:1 dropped the SABRE enhancement
by ∼5-fold (Figure , parts c and d); this observation is in reasonable agreement
with the ∼15-fold lower solubility of H2 in water
versus alcohol-based solvents.[61] However,
higher mole fractions of water (e.g., Figure d, inset) have not yielded observable enhancements
to date. While this second set of experiments represents a marked
improvement over the first in terms of both larger enhancements and
larger aqueous fractions for the solvent, the origin of the absence
of SABRE at higher aqueous fractions remains unclear. One hint may
lie in the changes to the hydride region of the spectrum. For example,
while the primary dispersive resonances at ca. −22.2 and ∼−23.1
ppm remain in the spectrum from the ∼13% v/v solution (Figure b, inset), overall
the hydride signal is attenuated, there appears to be a new absorptive
resonance at ∼(−)22.5 ppm, and the other weak resonances
appear to have bifurcated and shifted several parts per million downfield.
With ∼43% D2O, only a weak dispersive resonance
at ca. −22.3 ppm remains, and with higher aqueous fractions,
almost no hydride signal can be detected (not shown).
Figure 3
SABRE studies with the
PEGylated Ir catalyst (7/14) in various
deuterated ethanol/water mixtures. (a) Thermally
polarized reference 1H NMR scan from a D2O/d6-ethanol (∼13%/87% v/v) solution following
activation; the spectrum is vertically scaled 5-fold compared to panel
b, which shows the successful observation of SABRE enhancement of
substrate (py) 1H resonances after 1 min of bubbling with
5.1 atm of pH2 at ∼11 mT, then transfer to 9.39
T for high-field acquisition; enhancements up to ∼40-fold were
observed with 3.5 mM catalyst and the given conditions. Changing the
D2O/d6-ethanol fraction to
∼43%/57% v/v (c and d) and 63%/37% v/v (inset) significantly
impacted the magnitude of the SABRE enhancement; the SABRE spectrum
in panel d showed less than an ∼10-fold enhancement compared
to the corresponding thermal spectrum (c), and no observed SABRE enhancement
was observed in the 63%/37% solution.
SABRE studies with the
PEGylated Ir catalyst (7/14) in various
deuterated ethanol/water mixtures. (a) Thermally
polarized reference 1H NMR scan from a D2O/d6-ethanol (∼13%/87% v/v) solution following
activation; the spectrum is vertically scaled 5-fold compared to panel
b, which shows the successful observation of SABRE enhancement of
substrate (py) 1H resonances after 1 min of bubbling with
5.1 atm of pH2 at ∼11 mT, then transfer to 9.39
T for high-field acquisition; enhancements up to ∼40-fold were
observed with 3.5 mM catalyst and the given conditions. Changing the
D2O/d6-ethanol fraction to
∼43%/57% v/v (c and d) and 63%/37% v/v (inset) significantly
impacted the magnitude of the SABRE enhancement; the SABRE spectrum
in panel d showed less than an ∼10-fold enhancement compared
to the corresponding thermal spectrum (c), and no observed SABRE enhancement
was observed in the 63%/37% solution.The observations of reduced (or no) SABRE enhancements in
large
aqueous fractions are qualitatively similar to those very recently
reported by Fekete et al.,[45] who investigated
the use of two different synthetic approaches for generating water-soluble
iridium-based SABRE catalysts (respectively featuring sulfonated phosphine
groups and IMes NHC variants difunctionalized with triazole groups).
For those catalysts, significant 1H NMR enhancements could
be observed in organic solvents, but little or no SABRE activity was
observed when the aqueous fraction was too great. In that work, the
absence of SABRE activity was attributed to the much lower solubility
of H2 in water compared to the organic solvents. The observations
reported here could be largely explained by the reduced pH2 concentration; however, other effects may be contributing given
the complete lack of SABRE activity with high water fractions, as
well as the changes in the hydride spectra. As an aside, the solvent
environment during activation (i.e., organic vs aqueous) did not affect
the results. Thus, the reduced pH2 concentration, possibly
combined with structural changes of the catalyst that interfere with
the formation of effective hydride species, binding of the substrate,
and/or subsequent transfer of spin order from pH2 to substrate
spins, likely leads to the loss of SABRE activity with high aqueous
fractions—issues that will be the subject of future study.
Exploring SABRE with the CODDA Catalyst
As mentioned
above, the standard SABRE catalyst (16) is effectively
insoluble in water for the present purposes; however, changes accompanying
catalyst activation provide a water-soluble structure (e.g., 15).[57] Thus, in light of the challenges
presented by the PEGylated catalyst, an alternative design approach
was devised to provide a catalyst structure with improved water solubility
(e.g., [IrCl(CODDA)IMes], 13, Figure ) that, once activated, should yield the
same SABRE-active structure as 15—with the goal
of enabling aqueous SABRE in a single step without need for any organic
cosolvent.Although not as water-soluble as 7 (at
least ∼10 mg/mL), according to atomic absorption spectroscopy
(AAS) the solubility of the CODDA catalyst (13) in water
is ∼0.2 mg/mL; thus, a saturated solution of 13 (with ∼0.3 mM dissolved concentration) was prepared in deuterated
water with excess py substrate (∼10 mM). Bubbling with pH2 allowed the activation of the catalyst in an aqueous environment
to be monitored in situ via hyperpolarization-enhanced 1H NMR (Figure ).
More specifically, spectra from the hydride region acquired during
activation of 13 are shown in Figure a, and these results are compared with selected
spectra obtained from the standard catalyst (16) in deuterated
water (Figure b) and
methanol solvents (Figure c), respectively. At first (30 s), the signals from the hydride
region for 13 are dramatically different from what is
observed during activation of 16. Reflecting the different
intermediate structures present, alternating absorptive/emissive (or
dispersive) signals downfield of the activated catalyst’s characteristic
shift (−22.8 ppm) are virtually absent, and instead the early
spectra are dominated by a number of purely absorptive peaks that
are mostly further upfield (i.e., with a more negative chemical shift),
including a strong peak at −26.2 ppm from a key intermediate
structure. Nevertheless, following 180 s of pH2 bubbling,
the expected singlet peak at ca. −22.8 ppm is observed, in
excellent agreement with the hydride shift of the activated structure 15 obtained from the standard catalyst in methanol (Figure c). However, corresponding
efforts to activate 16 directly in D2O were
unsuccessful, yielding a cloudy suspension and no discernible enhanced
NMR signals from the hydride region (Figure b). In any case, the above results are consistent
with successful activation of the novel catalyst 13 in
water in just a few minutes to achieve the desired activated structure 15.
Figure 4
Comparison of the hydride regions of 1H NMR spectra
acquired during activation of the water-soluble CODDA/Ir SABRE catalyst 13 (a) and the conventional Ir/IMes SABRE catalyst 16 (b and c). (a) Upfield 1H NMR region showing changes
to the hydride resonances during activation of 13 in
D2O observed at 30, 60, and 180 s after pH2 bubbling
began (1 atm). A corresponding attempt to observe activation of the
(poorly water-soluble) conventional SABRE catalyst in D2O (16) exhibited no hydride signal (b). Selected spectra
obtained separately during activation of 16 in deuterated
methanol are shown in panel c, respectively, 60 and 420 s following
the onset of pH2 bubbling. As expected, activation of both 13 and 16 trend toward the same final hydride
signal (i.e., a strong singlet at ∼22.8 ppm). Spectra in panels
a–c possess different vertical scales.
Comparison of the hydride regions of 1H NMR spectra
acquired during activation of the water-soluble CODDA/Ir SABRE catalyst 13 (a) and the conventional Ir/IMes SABRE catalyst 16 (b and c). (a) Upfield 1H NMR region showing changes
to the hydride resonances during activation of 13 in
D2O observed at 30, 60, and 180 s after pH2 bubbling
began (1 atm). A corresponding attempt to observe activation of the
(poorly water-soluble) conventional SABRE catalyst in D2O (16) exhibited no hydride signal (b). Selected spectra
obtained separately during activation of 16 in deuterated
methanol are shown in panel c, respectively, 60 and 420 s following
the onset of pH2 bubbling. As expected, activation of both 13 and 16 trend toward the same final hydride
signal (i.e., a strong singlet at ∼22.8 ppm). Spectra in panels
a–c possess different vertical scales.Following successful activation of the CODDA catalyst in
deuterated
water, the potential of this catalyst for performing SABRE enhancement
of 1H NMR in aqueous environments was evaluated using the
standard test substrate pyridine (Figure ). With only 1 atm of pH2 bubbling
(∼90% pH2 fraction) and catalyst and substrate concentrations
of ∼0.3 and ∼10 mM, respectively, an initial enhancement
of ca. ε = −25 was achieved for the ortho 1Hpy position after 30 s of bubbling at ∼10 mT fringe field
and subsequent transfer to 9.4 T (Figure b), compared to the signal from a corresponding
thermal spectrum (Figure a). The inset of Figure b shows the corresponding hydride regions obtained
from the CODDA catalyst during the SABRE experiments, indicating that
the CODDA catalyst is essentially activated by the time the SABRE
spectra were recorded (total pH2 bubbling time of 210 and
240 s, respectively). Repeating the experiment permitted enhancements
as large as ca. −32, −25, and −16 for ortho,
para, and meta 1HPy positions to be observed, Figure b; Table . However, the sample from Figure b containing an aqueous
suspension of the traditional SABRE catalyst (16) yields
no SABRE enhancement, Figure c.
Figure 5
SABRE studies with the water-soluble CODDA/Ir SABRE catalyst (13/15) in 100% D2O. (a) Thermally
polarized reference 1H NMR scan from the solution following
activation with pH2 in the presence of excess substrate
(py); the spectrum is vertically scaled 5-fold compared to panel b,
which shows two spectra exhibiting successful observation of SABRE
enhancement after bubbling with 1 atm of pH2 at ∼10
mT [total bubbling times of 210 s (30 s immediately prior to acquisition,
green dashed curve) and 240 s (30 s immediately prior to acquisition,
red solid curve) for the spectra, respectively], then transfer to
9.39 T for high-field acquisition (note that the green curve is shown
horizontally offset by a fraction of a ppm to show the enhancement
compared to the red curve). Corresponding peak enhancements were ∼25-fold
and ∼32-fold for py in water with only 1 atm of pH2 bubbling in the two spectra, using a catalyst concentration of 0.3
mM. The inset shows the corresponding hydride region. A separate experiment
where SABRE was attempted using the standard Ir/IMes catalyst in deuterated
water exhibited no SABRE enhancement (c). (Vertical scale for panel
c is different from that of panels a and b.)
SABRE studies with the water-soluble CODDA/Ir SABRE catalyst (13/15) in 100% D2O. (a) Thermally
polarized reference 1H NMR scan from the solution following
activation with pH2 in the presence of excess substrate
(py); the spectrum is vertically scaled 5-fold compared to panel b,
which shows two spectra exhibiting successful observation of SABRE
enhancement after bubbling with 1 atm of pH2 at ∼10
mT [total bubbling times of 210 s (30 s immediately prior to acquisition,
green dashed curve) and 240 s (30 s immediately prior to acquisition,
red solid curve) for the spectra, respectively], then transfer to
9.39 T for high-field acquisition (note that the green curve is shown
horizontally offset by a fraction of a ppm to show the enhancement
compared to the red curve). Corresponding peak enhancements were ∼25-fold
and ∼32-fold for py in water with only 1 atm of pH2 bubbling in the two spectra, using a catalyst concentration of 0.3
mM. The inset shows the corresponding hydride region. A separate experiment
where SABRE was attempted using the standard Ir/IMes catalyst in deuterated
water exhibited no SABRE enhancement (c). (Vertical scale for panel
c is different from that of panels a and b.)The experiments described above were performed in deuterated
water
to facilitate spectral interpretation and quantification; however,
this practice poses no impediment to broader application of the approach
(including for ultimate in vivo experiments) because SABRE hyperpolarization
generally works as well (or better) in protonated solution environments,
particularly for heteronuclei.[49,64,65] We also note that these results are similar to what has been achieved
using the conventional catalyst following dissolution and activation
in organic solvents, drying, and reconstitution in D2O
(ε ∼ 30), using a weaker substrate (nicotinamide) but
higher pH2 pressure (∼5 atm) and greater (∼1:10)
catalyst/substrate ratio.[57] In any case,
these results indicate the successful preparation, activation, and
demonstration of a catalyst capable of easily performing SABRE enhancement
in aqueous environments in a single step. This approach obviates the
need for either the extra steps associated with reconstitution or
the exposure of sensitive biological samples to organic solvents,
and thus may also help facilitate biomedical (and ultimately in vivo)
applications.
Conclusion
In summary, two novel
approaches were investigated for creating
water-soluble catalysts to increase the nuclear spin polarization
of substrates via SABRE. PEGylation of an asymmetric aromatic carbene
ligand provided a highly water-soluble structure that yielded ∼40–60-fold 1H NMR enhancements in alcohol-based solvents and in lean water/alcohol
mixtures, but lost SABRE activity in more highly aqueous solvent mixtures.
In the second strategy, diol functionalization of the COD ring provided
a catalyst structure with lower water solubility, but sufficient to
dissolve and activate in water to enable aqueous SABRE in a single
step—without need for either an organic cosolvent or solvent
removal followed by aqueous reconstitution—here demonstrated
for the first time. The >30-fold 1H enhancement under
our
conditions (with only 1 atm pH2—a mere technical
limitation of the bubbler apparatus used for those experiments) is
in reasonable agreement with our recent observation of nearly 2000-fold
enhancements of 1H signals for the same substrate using
the standard SABRE catalyst in deuterated methanol with elevated pH2 pressures,[41] given the expected
∼75-fold difference in pH2 concentration; correspondingly,
much larger enhancements should be expected upon implementing experimental
approaches to greatly increase the pH2 concentration, including
higher-pressure reaction vessels. Moreover, the results presented
here likely point the way to achieving higher aqueous catalyst concentrations,
which should be possible by employing some combination of the above
synthetic approaches (e.g., by functionalizing the COD with moieties
that endow greater aqueous solubility). Such improvements, combined
with other approaches, should help enable biological and spectroscopic
applications that will be pursued in due course.
Authors: Bram J A van Weerdenburg; Nan Eshuis; Marco Tessari; Floris P J T Rutjes; Martin C Feiters Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Alexandra V Yurkovskaya; Hans-Martin Vieth; Konstantin L Ivanov Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: M Fekete; C Gibard; G J Dear; G G R Green; A J J Hooper; A D Roberts; F Cisnetti; S B Duckett Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Bram J A van Weerdenburg; Stefan Glöggler; Nan Eshuis; A H J Ton Engwerda; Jan M M Smits; René de Gelder; Stephan Appelt; Sybren S Wymenga; Marco Tessari; Martin C Feiters; Bernhard Blümich; Floris P J T Rutjes Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Milton L Truong; Fan Shi; Ping He; Bingxin Yuan; Kyle N Plunkett; Aaron M Coffey; Roman V Shchepin; Danila A Barskiy; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Kevin W Waddell; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Roman V Shchepin; Milton L Truong; Thomas Theis; Aaron M Coffey; Fan Shi; Kevin W Waddell; Warren S Warren; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Kirill V Kovtunov; Ekaterina V Pokochueva; Oleg G Salnikov; Samuel F Cousin; Dennis Kurzbach; Basile Vuichoud; Sami Jannin; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson; Danila A Barskiy; Igor V Koptyug Journal: Chem Asian J Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: Zijian Zhou; Jin Yu; Johannes F P Colell; Raul Laasner; Angus Logan; Danila A Barskiy; Roman V Shchepin; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Volker Blum; Warren S Warren; Thomas Theis Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Bryce E Kidd; Jamil A Mashni; Miranda N Limbach; Fan Shi; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Yuqing Hou; Boyd M Goodson Journal: Chemistry Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Peter J Rayner; Michael J Burns; Alexandra M Olaru; Philip Norcott; Marianna Fekete; Gary G R Green; Louise A R Highton; Ryan E Mewis; Simon B Duckett Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kirill V Kovtunov; Larisa M Kovtunova; Max E Gemeinhardt; Andrey V Bukhtiyarov; Jonathan Gesiorski; Valerii I Bukhtiyarov; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor V Koptyug; Boyd M Goodson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jan-Bernd Hövener; Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Bryce Kidd; C Russell Bowers; Stefan Glöggler; Kirill V Kovtunov; Markus Plaumann; Rachel Katz-Brull; Kai Buckenmaier; Alexej Jerschow; Francesca Reineri; Thomas Theis; Roman V Shchepin; Shawn Wagner; Pratip Bhattacharya; Niki M Zacharias; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Danila A Barskiy; Roman V Shchepin; Aaron M Coffey; Thomas Theis; Warren S Warren; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Johannes F P Colell; Angus W J Logan; Zijian Zhou; Roman V Shchepin; Danila A Barskiy; Gerardo X Ortiz; Qiu Wang; Steven J Malcolmson; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Warren S Warren; Thomas Theis Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.126