Literature DB >> 27350572

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of undetermined biliary stenoses: A meta-analysis.

Yuan Liu1, Yi Lu2, Bo Sun1, Wen-Ming Zhang1, Zhao-Zhen Zhang1, Yi-Ping He1, Xiu-Jiang Yang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Presently, both the accuracy and sensitivity for distinguishing biliary stenosis from benign to malignant are low. In recent articles, the probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) showed a better sensitivity than traditional methods in diagnosing malignant biliary stenosis. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarise the published literature.
METHODS: A systematic search for literature was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases published until November 2015. Further publications were found in the reference lists of the relevant articles. A quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of a pCLE for discriminating benign and malignant biliary stenoses.
RESULTS: Eight studies involving 280 patients were included in the analysis. Significant heterogeneity in specificity was observed among the studies (Cochran's Q test=15.89, degrees of freedom [df]=7, P=0.0261 and I2=55.9%), while the heterogeneity in sensitivity was not obvious (Cochran's Q test=7.99, df=7, P=0.3334 and I2=12.4%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8968. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis indicated that the outlier was the source of heterogeneity. When analysed in the random-effects model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR) and negative LR were 0.90 (0.84-0.94), 0.75 (0.66-0.83), 3.17 (2.18-4.61) and 0.17 (0.11-0.26), respectively. No significant publication bias was found in our research.
CONCLUSION: A pCLE is a valuable method for the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign biliary stenoses. However, a preferable diagnostic standard should be explored and improvements in specificity are required. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27350572     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2210-7401            Impact factor:   2.947


  7 in total

1.  SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Brian R Davis; Abdulrahim Alawashez; Salvatore Docimo; Alia Qureshi; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Advanced Imaging of the Biliary System and Pancreas.

Authors:  Selena Zhou; James Buxbaum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  New technologies for indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  Roberto Oleas; Juan Alcívar-Vasquez; Carlos Robles-Medranda
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Diagnosis of Biliary and Pancreatic Disorders: A Systematic Analysis.

Authors:  Do Han Kim; Somashekar G Krishna; Emmanuel Coronel; Paul T Kröner; Herbert C Wolfsen; Michael B Wallace; Juan E Corral
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Use of Endoscopic Scraper and Cell Block Technique as a Replacement for Conventional Brush for Diagnosing Malignant Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Akihisa Kato; Hiroyuki Kato; Itaru Naitoh; Kazuki Hayashi; Michihiro Yoshida; Yasuki Hori; Kenta Kachi; Go Asano; Hidenori Sahashi; Tadashi Toyohara; Kayoko Kuno; Yusuke Kito; Satoru Takahashi; Hiromi Kataoka
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Diagnostic Process Using Endoscopy for Biliary Strictures: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yuki Tanisaka; Masafumi Mizuide; Akashi Fujita; Tomoya Ogawa; Masahiro Suzuki; Hiromune Katsuda; Youichi Saito; Kazuya Miyaguchi; Tomoaki Tashima; Yumi Mashimo; Shomei Ryozawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Biliary Tree Diagnostics: Advances in Endoscopic Imaging and Tissue Sampling.

Authors:  Matteo Ghisa; Angelo Bellumat; Manuela De Bona; Flavio Valiante; Marco Tollardo; Gaia Riguccio; Angelo Iacobellis; Edoardo Savarino; Andrea Buda
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.