Literature DB >> 27349429

Amount of stroma is associated with mammographic density and stromal expression of oestrogen receptor in normal breast tissues.

Marike Gabrielson1, Flaminia Chiesa2, Janna Paulsson3, Carina Strell3, Catharina Behmer4, Katarina Rönnow5, Kamila Czene2, Arne Östman3, Per Hall2.   

Abstract

Following female sex and age, mammographic density is considered one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Despite the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk, little is known about the underlying histology and biological basis of breast density. To better understand the mechanisms behind mammographic density we assessed morphology, proliferation and hormone receptor status in relation to mammographic density in breast tissues from healthy women. Tissues were obtained from 2012-2013 by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy from 160 women as part of the Karma (Karolinska mammography project for risk prediction for breast cancer) project. Mammograms were collected through routine mammography screening and mammographic density was calculated using STRATUS. The histological composition, epithelial and stromal proliferation status and hormone receptor status were assessed through immunohistochemical staining. Higher mammographic density was significantly associated with a greater proportion of stromal and epithelial tissue and a lower proportion of adipose tissue. Epithelial expression levels of Ki-67, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were not associated with mammographic density. Epithelial Ki-67 was associated with a greater proportion of epithelial tissue, and epithelial PR was associated with a greater proportion of stromal and a lower proportion of adipose tissue. Epithelial ER was not associated with any tissues. In contrast, expression of ER in the stroma was significantly associated with a greater proportion of stroma, and negatively associated with the amount of adipose tissue. High mammographic density is associated with higher amount of stroma and epithelium and less amount of fat, but is not associated with a change in epithelial proliferation or receptor status. Increased expressions of both epithelial PR and stromal ER are associated with a greater proportion of stroma, suggesting hormonal involvement in regulating breast tissue composition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast tissue; Histology; Hormone receptor status; Mammographic density; Stromal breast tissue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27349429     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3877-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  Stiff stroma increases breast cancer risk by inducing the oncogene ZNF217.

Authors:  Jason J Northey; Alexander S Barrett; Irene Acerbi; Mary-Kate Hayward; Stephanie Talamantes; Ivory S Dean; Janna K Mouw; Suzanne M Ponik; Jonathon N Lakins; Po-Jui Huang; Junmin Wu; Quanming Shi; Susan Samson; Patricia J Keely; Rita A Mukhtar; Jan T Liphardt; John A Shepherd; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kirk C Hansen; Laurie E Littlepage; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Associations between mammographic density and tumor characteristics in Chinese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Erni Li; Jennifer L Guida; Yuan Tian; Hyuna Sung; Hela Koka; Mengjie Li; Ariane Chan; Han Zhang; Eric Tang; Changyuan Guo; Joseph Deng; Nan Hu; Ning Lu; Gretchen L Gierach; Jing Li; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Association of breast cancer risk, density, and stiffness: global tissue stiffness on breast MR elastography (MRE).

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Kay Pepin; Kathy R Brandt; Gina L Mazza; Barbara A Pockaj; Jun Chen; Yuxiang Zhou; Donald W Northfelt; Karen Anderson; Juliana M Kling; Celine M Vachon; Kristin R Swanson; Mehdi Nikkhah; Richard Ehman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 4.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

5.  Inter-Individual Variation in Response to Estrogen in Human Breast Explants.

Authors:  Karen A Dunphy; Amye L Black; Amy L Roberts; Aman Sharma; Zida Li; Sneha Suresh; Eva P Browne; Kathleen F Arcaro; Jennifer Ser-Dolansky; Carol Bigelow; Melissa A Troester; Sallie S Schneider; Grace Makari-Judson; Giovanna M Crisi; D Joseph Jerry
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  Affinity proteomic profiling of plasma for proteins associated to area-based mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Sanna Byström; Martin Eklund; Mun-Gwan Hong; Claudia Fredolini; Mikael Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Jochen M Schwenk; Marike Gabrielson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Adjuvant Therapy and Mammographic Density Changes in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Eriksson; Wei He; Mikael Eriksson; Keith Humphreys; Jonas Bergh; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-01-29

8.  Stromal Cell Signature Associated with Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama; René Aloísio da Costa Vieira; Victor Piana Andrade; Rosimeire Aparecida Roela; Luiz Guilherme Cernaglia Aureliano Lima; Ligia Maria Kerr; Adriano Polpo de Campos; Carlos Alberto de Bragança Pereira; Pedro Adolpho de Menezes Pacheco Serio; Giselly Encinas; Simone Maistro; Matheus de Almeida Leite Petroni; Maria Mitzi Brentani; Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Mammographic density changes in surgical weight loss-an indication for personalized screening.

Authors:  Natalia Partain; Ali Mokdad; Nancy Puzziferri; Jessica Porembka; Stephen Seiler; Alana Christie; Deborah Farr; Aeisha Rivers; A Marilyn Leitch; Rachel Wooldridge; James Huth; Roshni Rao
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Association of reproductive history with breast tissue characteristics and receptor status in the normal breast.

Authors:  Marike Gabrielson; Flaminia Chiesa; Catharina Behmer; Katarina Rönnow; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.