| Literature DB >> 27347968 |
Nasrin Afsarimanesh1, Asif I Zia2,3, Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay4, Marlena Kruger5, Pak-Lam Yu6, Jurgen Kosel7, Zoltan Kovacs8.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to report a novel non-invasive, real-time, and label-free smart assay technique for the prognostic detection of bone loss by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The proposed system incorporated an antibody-antigen-based sensor functionalization to induce selectivity for the C-terminal telopeptide type one collagen (CTx-I) molecules-a bone loss biomarker. Streptavidin agarose was immobilized on the sensing area of a silicon substrate-based planar sensor, patterned with gold interdigital electrodes, to capture the antibody-antigen complex. Calibration experiments were conducted with various known CTx-I concentrations in a buffer solution to obtain a reference curve that was used to quantify the concentration of an analyte in the unknown serum samples. Multivariate chemometric analyses were done to determine the performance viability of the developed system. The analyses suggested that a frequency of 710 Hz is the most discriminating regarding the system sensitivity. A detection limit of 0.147 ng/mL was achieved for the proposed sensor and the corresponding reference curve was linear in the range of 0.147 ng/mL to 2.669 ng/mL. Two sheep blood samples were tested by the developed technique and the results were validated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results from the proposed technique match those from the ELISA.Entities:
Keywords: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS); Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA); bone turnover markers; interdigital sensors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27347968 PMCID: PMC4970028 DOI: 10.3390/s16070976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Sensor’s design and connection pads.
Figure 2The standard curve plotted from the ELISA results.
Figure 3SEM image of streptavidin agarose-coated sensing surface.
Figure 4Graphical illustration of the steps required to prepare the sensing surface for CTx-I sensing.
Figure 5Block diagram of the measurement acquisition system.
Figure 6(a) Imaginary part (reactance) of the impedance vs. frequency; and (b) real part of the impedance vs. frequency.
Figure 7Nyquist plot for different CTx-I concentrations.
Figure 8Proposed equivalent circuit by CNLS with a parallel combination of constant phase element (CPE1) and charge transfer resistance (R2) in series with the solution resistance (R1).
Equivalent circuit parameters.
| Component Parameters | 0.147 ng/mL | 0.437 ng/mL | 0.798 ng/mL | 1.693 ng/mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1(Ω) | 1.790 × 10−14 | 1.686 × 10−14 | 1.657 × 10−14 | 1.660 × 10−12 |
| R2(Ω) | 1.153 × 105 | 1.347 × 105 | 1.480 × 105 | 1.596 × 105 |
| P1 | 1.535 × 10−8 | 1.588 × 10−8 | 1.036 × 10−8 | 6.464 × 10−9 |
| n1 | 0.7944 | 0.7944 | 0.8345 | 0.8823 |
|
| 0.0133 | 0.0100 | 0.0161 | 0.0246 |
Figure 9(a) Principal component analysis score plot (PC1-PC2); and (b) principal component analysis loadings plot (PC1-PC2).
Figure 10(a) Partial least square regression model to regress on the CTx-I concentration (red color is for calibration and the blue color is for cross-validation model); and (b) regression vector of the partial least square regression model showing 710 Hz as the most discriminating frequency.
Figure 11The reference calibration curve for the sensitivity of the sensor vs. concentration evaluated at 710 Hz.