Literature DB >> 27347180

CD73 as a novel marker for poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Zhen-Hu Ren1, Yong-Xiang Yuan1, Tong Ji1, Chen-Ping Zhang1.   

Abstract

Ecto-5'-nucleotidase [cluster of differentiation (CD)73] has important functions in several types of cancer, however, its expression in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains unknown. The present study was designed to investigate CD73 expression in SCC. CD73 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 113 patients with oral SCC (OSCC). The association between CD73 expression and clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) times of patients were statistically analyzed. CD73 expression was detected in 58.4% (66/113) of OSCC patients, with the immunostaining predominantly localized in the cytomembrane and a little in the cytoplasm. Statistical analysis revealed that CD73 expression was more frequently detected in patients with larger tumors (P=0.021). The overexpression of CD73 was significantly associated with clinical stage (P=0.047). Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining showed that overexpression of CD73 was inversely correlated with DFS (P=0.002) and OS (P=0.002) times. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CD73 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor DFS (P=0.018) and OS (P=0.021). The current study is the first to evaluate the clinical significance and prognostic value of CD73 in patients with OSCC. The findings suggest that CD73 is a potential prognostic marker for OSCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; cluster of differentiation 73; oral squamous cell carcinoma; prognosis; squamous cell carcinoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 27347180      PMCID: PMC4906962          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Despite improvements in treatment strategies for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), it remains one of the most devastating malignancies. OSCC is the sixth most common type of cancer in the world and accounts for almost 3% of all cancer cases (1–3). Although significant advancements have been made in the prevention, diagnostics and treatment strategies for OSCC, only modest progress has been made in improving the survival time in patients with progression or metastatic disease over the last 20 years (4,5). In 2012, ~300,400 new cases of oral cavity cancer, including lip cancer, and ~145,400 associated mortalities occurred worldwide (6). Promising markers are the basis for improving the early detection and accurate survival evaluation of patients with OSCC. Cluster of differentiation (CD)73, also known as 5′-nucleotidase (5′-NT) or ecto-5′-NT, is a 70-kD, glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchored cell surface enzyme that is encoded by the 5′-nucleotidase ecto gene. CD73 was originally defined as a lymphocyte differentiation antigen, and has both enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions (7). CD73 catalyzes the dephosphorylation of extracellular adenosine monophosphate to adenosine, promoting its suppressive effects on the immune system in the tumor microenvironment, invasion and metastasis of cancer (8). In addition to its enzymatic function, CD73 is also an adhesive and signaling molecule that mediates cancer invasion and metastasis (9). Thus, both the enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of CD73 are involved in the processes of cancer occurrence and development. Increased expression of CD73 expression has been observed in several types of malignancy (10,11), such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer and malignant melanoma. In addition, it has prognostic value for patients with colon cancer and has been suggested as a diagnostic factor in papillary thyroid carcinoma (12). However, there is almost no information available regarding the survival influence of CD73 expression on tumor cells in patients with SCC. The current study analyzed the association between CD73 expression and clinicopathological characteristics, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) time, in patients with OSCC.

Materials and methods

Enrolled patients

Patients with OSCC who underwent surgery (combined primary tumor resection and neck dissection/rescontruction) at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China) were included in the present study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients with OSCC (preoperative pathological diagnosis); ii) patients that underwent primary therapy in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology; iii) patients that did not receive preoperative chemotherapy, radiation therapy or any other treatment prior to surgery; and iv) patients diagnosed between January 2007 and December 2008. Cancerous and adjacent tumor samples were collected immediately after surgery. The distance between the tumor and the adjacent samples was >2 cm. According to the aforementioned criteria, 113 patients were included in the present study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Definition of OS and DFS

OS time was calculated from the date of initial surgery to the date mortality from OSCC. If the patient did not succumb to OSCC, the end point was defined as mortality from any cause or the last date of follow-up. DFS was defined as the time from the date of initial surgery to the date of local or distant progression. If progression did not occur, the end point was defined as mortality from any cause or as the fifth year after surgery.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Sections (4 µm) were cut from formalin-fixed (Mingsheng Disinfectant Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China) and paraffin-embedded (Shanghai Hualing Recovery Appliance Factory, Shanghai, China) tissues blocks of OSCC, and placed on positively charged glass slides (Citotest Labware Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Haimen, China). Following paraffin removal with xylene (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and dehydration with ethanol absolute (Ling Feng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), the slides were steamed with 10 mmol/l citrate buffer (pH 6.0; DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 20 min for antigen retrieval. After cooling to room temperature, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C (15 h) with primary mouse monoclonal anti-CD73 antibody (1:50 dilution; cat no. sc-32299; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA). After several washes with phosphate-buffered saline, the sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse or ant-rabbit secondary antibody (cat no. GK500705; Gene Tech, Shanghai, China) for 45 min at 37°C, prior to adding diaminobenzidine (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 3.5 min at room temperature. Using an Axio Scope.A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkocken, Germany), CD73 staining was independently evaluated by an expert pathologist who was blinded to the clinical information. The evaluation was analyzed according to the intensity of staining and the percentage of stained cells. Scoring estimations were stratified into four categories, as follows: +++, 20–49% moderately to intensely stained cells or ≥50% positively stained cells; ++, 10–19% intensively stained cells or 20–49% weakly stained cells; +, 10–19% weakly to moderately stained cells; ±, <10% positively stained cells; and -, 0% positively stained cells. For statistical analysis, + and above were recorded as positive; - and ± were ranked as negative (13).

Statistical analysis

Comparisons of variables between the groups were based on the χ2 goodness-of-fit test or Fisher's exact test. DFS and OS times were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier life-table method. Univariate and multivariate parameters [gender, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, tumor stage (T stage) (14), lymph node metastasis, clinical stage (15), degree of differentiation] were analyzed with respect to DFS and OS using the Cox regression hazard model. Each experiment was repeated 3 times All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 13; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

CD73 expression in primary OSCCs and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics

The characteristics of enrolled patients are indicated in Table I. Positive staining was noted in 58.4% (66/113) of OSCC samples. CD73 staining was predominantly localized in the cytomembrane with a small amount of staining in the cytoplasm. The OSCC samples showed marked overexpression of CD73 compared with matched adjacent noncancerous mucosa (Fig. 1). The association between CD73 expression and clinicopathological variables are indicated in Table II. Statistical analysis of the association between CD73 expression and clinicopathological characteristics identified that CD73 has a direct association with T stage (P=0.021) and clinical stage (P=0.047). CD73 expression was not significantly associated with other characteristics.
Table I.

Characteristics of the patients enrolled in this study (n=113).

CharacteristicValue
Age, years
  Median (range)59.5 (26–83)
Gender, n (%)
  Male71 (62.8)
  Female42 (37.2)
T stage, n (%)
  T144 (38.9)
  T245 (39.8)
  T315 (13.3)
  T49 (8.0)
Clinical stage, n (%)
  I23 (20.4)
  II23 (20.4)
  III31 (27.4)
  IV36 (31.8)
Differentiation, n (%)
  Well24 (21.2)
  Moderate80 (70.8)
  Poor9 (8.0)
CD73 cytology, n (%)
  Positive66 (58.4)
  Negative47 (41.6)
Metastatic lymph nodes, n (%)
  Positive36 (31.9)
  Negative77 (68.1)
Figure 1.

Association between CD73 expression in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma by immunohistochemical staining. (A) +++, (B) ++, (C) + and (D) - scoring in OSCC. (E) - scoring in adjacent non-cancerous mucosa. Magnification, ×400.

Table II.

Association between clinicopathological characteristics and CD73 expression in 113 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

CD73 expression, %

Clinicopathological featureNo.NegativePositiveχ2P-value
Gender0.9990.331
  Male712744
  Female422022
Age, years2.0040.184
  <60562729
  ≥60572037
Smoking0.0650.844
  Yes401624
  No733142
Drinking0.6560.522
  Yes311120
  No823646
T stage4.3580.021
  T3/T424519
  T1/T2894247
Lymph node metastasis0.1590.838
  +361422
  –773344
Clinical stage3.9410.047
  III/IV461432
  I/II673334
Histological type0.7780.378
  Poor954
  Well/moderate1044262

CD73, cluster of differentiation 73; T stage, tumor stage.

Association between CD73 expression, and DFS and OS times among patients with OSCC

Using follow-up data from the 113 patients with OSCC, the present study analyzed whether CD73 expression affected DFS and OS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that CD73-positive expression cases had significantly poorer DFS (P=0.002) and OS (P=0.002) times compared with CD73-negative cases. The 5-year DFS rate for positive CD73 expression was 47.0 compared with 78.7% for patients that were negative for CD73; similarly, the 5-year OS rates for CD73-positive and -negative expression were 50.0 vs. 78.7%, respectively (Fig. 2). After patients were stratified by T stage, cases with positive CD73 expression showed significantly poorer DFS and OS compared with CD73-negative cases among those classified as T1/T2 or clinical stage I/II. This trend was not observed in T3/T4 and clinical stage III/IV patients with OSCC (Fig. 3).
Figure 2.

Survival analysis according to the expression status of CD73 for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for (A) disease-free survival and (B) overall survival in the study cohort (n=113). CD73, cluster of differentiation 73.

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) according to T stage or clinical stage. CD73 expression is associated with (A) DFS or (B) OS among OSCC patients with T1/T2 tumors but is not significantly associated with (C) DFS and (D) OS among patients with T3/T4 tumors. CD73 expression is not associated with (E) DFS or (F) OS among OSCC patients in clinical stage I–II but is not significantly associated with DFS (G) and OS (H) among patients in clinical stage III–IV. T stage, tumor stage; CD73, cluster of differentiation 73.

CD73 is an independent poor prognostic marker for DFS and OS times among patients with OSCC

Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that CD73 expression was significantly associated with poor DFS (HR, 2.926; 95% CI, 1.447–5.917; P=0.003) and OS (HR, 2.936; 95% CI, 1.452–5.936; P=0.003) times of patients with OSCC (Table III). Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression hazard model confirmed that CD73 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor DFS (HR, 2.417; 95% CI, 1.162–5.028; P=0.018) and OS (HR, 2.355; 95% CI, 1.137–4.878; P=0.021; Table IV) among patients with OSCC. Multivariate analysis also indicated that T stage, clinical stage, degree of differentiation and lymph node metastasis have independent prognostic value in OSCC (Table IV).
Table III.

Statistical analysis of clinicopathological variables associated with DFS and OS in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma using the univariate Cox proportional hazards model.

DFSOS


VariableHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
CD73 expression0.0030.003
  Positive vs. negative2.9261.447–5.9172.9361.452–5.936
Gender0.5840.567
  Male vs. female1.1890.640–2.2101.1990.645–2.228
Age, years0.0600.057
  <60 vs. ≥601.0270.999–1.0551.0270.999–1.056
Smoking0.7510.751
  Yes vs. no0.9040.487–1.6810.9040.487–1.681
  Drinking0.9050.913
  Yes vs. no0.9610.496–1.8600.9640.498–1.866
T stage0.0000.000
  T3/T4 vs. T1/T21.7971.342–2.4081.8161.356–2.432
Lymph node metastasis0.0000.000
  + vs. −1.8971.344–2.6871.9151.358–2.701
Clinical stage0.0000.000
  III/IV vs. I/II1.6771.282–2.1941.6981.298–2.220
Histological type0.0080.009
  Poor vs. well-moderate2.1741.227–3.8532.1341.213–3.754

DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CD73, cluster of differentiation 73; T stage, tumor stage.

Table IV.

Statistical analysis of clinicopathological variables associated with DFS and OS in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

DFSOS


VariableHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
CD73 expression0.0180.021
  Positive vs. negative2.4171.162–5.0282.3551.137–4.878
Gender0.9470.897
  Male vs. female1.0250.486–2.1651.0500.498–2.214
Age, years0.0870.070
  <60 vs. ≥601.0280.996–1.0611.0300.998–1.063
Smoking0.7570.715
  Yes vs. no0.8520.308–2.3530.8230.289–2.343
Drinking0.6810.715
  Yes vs. no0.7950.267–2.3690.8100.262–2.505
T stage0.0020.003
  T3/T4 vs. T1/T22.7351.428–5.2362.5981.369–4.932
Lymph node metastasis0.0020.003
  + vs. −2.7751.443–5.3372.6331.376–5.039
Clinical stage0.0400.060
  I/II vs. III/IV0.4640.223–0.9640.5000.243–1.030
Histological type0.0250.045
  Poor vs. well/moderate2.5691.127–5.8572.2691.019–5.049

DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CD73, cluster of differentiation 73; T stage, tumor stage.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to evaluate the expression status of CD73 in patients with OSCC. The associations between CD73 expression and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated in patients with OSCC. The findings indicated that positive CD73 expression may be a novel prognosticator of adverse clinical outcome in patients with OSCC. In addition, the present results identified that CD73 expression status was statistically associated with the T stage, clinical stage, degree of differentiation and lymph node metastasis. According to these findings, we propose that CD73 may be a novel molecular prognostic marker in the evaluation of OSCC patient survival. The current findings may be the beginning of a new era of research into the role of CD73 in SCC. Overexpression of CD73 has been observed in broad types of cancer (16) and a growing body of literature has revealed the function of CD73 in cancer progression. For example, overexpression of CD73 was significantly associated with a worse prognosis in patients with triple negative breast cancer (17). By contrast, a number of retrospective studies reported that overexpression of CD73 was strongly correlated with improved clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer (18,19). Furthermore, Lu et al (20) investigated the expression status of CD73 in gastric cancer, and showed that CD73 expression was positively associated with cancer stage, depth of invasion and metastasis, with low OS observed in the patients with overexpression of CD73. In addition, numerous studies have revealed that high levels of CD73 are statistically associated with a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and gallbladder cancer (21,22). Zhao et al (23) reported the CD73 status in various leukemia subtypes, and found the CD73 status was correlated with leukemia subtype and differentiation. In addition, a retrospective study reported that CD73 overexpression was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer, and was more frequently observed in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with better prognosis, lower stage and better differentiation (19,24). Similar results were observed in malignant melanoma (25). Taken together, the aforementioned findings indicate that CD73 is a significant molecular prognosticator in various types of cancer. However, there is almost no information regarding CD73 expression in the tumor cells of patients with SCC. Therefore, the current study aimed to conduct research in this field. T stage and clinical stage are the most important prognostic markers in the evaluation of OSCC patient survival (26,27). The current findings confirmed the validity of the T stage and clinical stage at the molecular level. Furthermore, CD73 may be a crucial molecular prognostic marker in early T stage (T1/T2) or early clinical stage (I/II) OSCC. The limitations of the present study include the retrospective nature of the study and the limited number of enrolled patients. The findings of the study should be replicated in a randomized prospective study that includes a large sample size. Additional molecular studies are required to confirm whether CD73 has an important role in OSCC progression. The current authors are currently performing a further molecular study to confirm whether CD73 has an important role in OSCC. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed upregulation of CD73 in clinical OSCC tissues. In addition, it was identified that the grading of CD73 expression by immunohistochemical staining was able to significantly predict OSCC prognosis in a multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the CD73 expression status was significantly associated with T stage and clinical stage, and overexpression of CD73 was inversely correlated with the DFS and OS times of patients with OSCC. Thus, the results of the present study consistently suggest that CD73 is likely to be a novel prognostic marker of OSCC and holds promise for future tailored treatment strategies.
  26 in total

1.  Oncogenic BRAF induces melanoma cell invasion by downregulating the cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE5A.

Authors:  Imanol Arozarena; Berta Sanchez-Laorden; Leisl Packer; Cristina Hidalgo-Carcedo; Robert Hayward; Amaya Viros; Erik Sahai; Richard Marais
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  High expression of CD73 as a poor prognostic biomarker in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xian-Rui Wu; Xiao-Sheng He; Yu-Feng Chen; Rui-Xue Yuan; Yang Zeng; Lei Lian; Yi-Feng Zou; Nan Lan; Xiao-Jian Wu; Ping Lan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Saman Warnakulasuriya
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Phospholipase A2 group IIA expression correlates with prolonged survival in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang Xing; Hong Li; Xi-Yao Zhong; Lian-Hai Zhang; Xiao-Hong Wang; Yi-Qiang Liu; Shu-Qin Jia; Tao Shi; Zhao-Jian Niu; Yong Peng; Hong Du; Gui-Guo Zhang; Ying Hu; Ai-Ping Lu; Ji-You Li; She Chen; Jia-Fu Ji
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Risk factors for and consequences of inadequate surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mads Lawaetz; Preben Homøe
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2014-08-15

6.  [Characteristics and clinical significance of CD73 expression in subtypes of leukemia].

Authors:  Shi-Xuan Zhao; Hua-Mei Zhang; Shu-Xu Dong; Jin-Hua Liu; Zheng Zhou; Hui-Jun Wang; Xiao-Fan Zhu; Ying-Chang Mi; Yong-Xin Ru
Journal:  Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2011-10

7.  Muscle invasion in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma as a predictor of nodal status and local recurrence: just as effective as depth of invasion?

Authors:  Katherine Chandler; Courtney Vance; Steven Budnick; Susan Muller
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2011-09-04

8.  RNA interference of ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) inhibits human breast cancer cell growth and invasion.

Authors:  Xiuling Zhi; Sifeng Chen; Ping Zhou; Zhimin Shao; Li Wang; Zhouluo Ou; Lianhua Yin
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  NT5E and FcGBP as key regulators of TGF-1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) are associated with tumor progression and survival of patients with gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Li Xiong; Yu Wen; Xiongying Miao; Zhulin Yang
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 10.  Production of adenosine by ectonucleotidases: a key factor in tumor immunoescape.

Authors:  François Ghiringhelli; Mélanie Bruchard; Fanny Chalmin; Cédric Rébé
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-14
View more
  9 in total

1.  CD73 expression in myeloid-derived suppressor cells is correlated with clinical stages in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Weihui Zheng; Ying Zhu; Xiaolong Chen; Jianqiang Zhao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

2.  Overexpression of CD73 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and poor survival.

Authors:  Jun Zhao; Luisa M Solis Soto; Hua Wang; Matthew H Katz; Laura R Prakash; Michael Kim; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Jeffrey E Lee; Robert A Wolff; Yanqing Huang; Ignacio I Wistuba; Anirban Maitra; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Tregs: Where We Are and What Comes Next?

Authors:  Hai Zhao; Xuelian Liao; Yan Kang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  CD73 is associated with poor prognosis in HNSCC.

Authors:  Zhen-Hu Ren; Cheng-Zhong Lin; Wei Cao; Rong Yang; Wei Lu; Zhe-Qi Liu; Yi-Ming Chen; Xi Yang; Zhen Tian; Li-Zhen Wang; Jiang Li; Xu Wang; Wan-Tao Chen; Tong Ji; Chen-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20

5.  Comprehensive evaluation of NT5E/CD73 expression and its prognostic significance in distinct types of cancers.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Xiaofeng Xu; Meng Qiao; Xuefei Li; Chao Zhao; Fei Zhou; Guanghui Gao; Fengying Wu; Xiaoxia Chen; Chunxia Su; Shengxiang Ren; Changyun Zhai; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Immunometabolic Dysfunction of Natural Killer Cells Mediated by the Hypoxia-CD73 Axis in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Andrea M Chambers; Sandro Matosevic
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-07-24

7.  CD73 a novel marker for the diagnosis of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  Mohammad-Ali Ranjbar; Zahra Ranjbar; Maryam Zahed; Negar Nikookar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-03-01

8.  CD73 facilitates invadopodia formation and boosts malignancy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via the MAPK signaling pathway.

Authors:  Feifei Xue; Tianxiao Wang; Hao Shi; Hongjie Feng; Guanying Feng; Ruixia Wang; Yao Yao; Hua Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.518

9.  CD73 blockade enhances the local and abscopal effects of radiotherapy in a murine rectal cancer model.

Authors:  Hidenori Tsukui; Hisanaga Horie; Koji Koinuma; Hideyuki Ohzawa; Yasunaru Sakuma; Yoshinori Hosoya; Hironori Yamaguchi; Kotaro Yoshimura; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Naohiro Sata; Joji Kitayama
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.