Literature DB >> 27347078

Median effective concentration of remifentanil for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced cardiovascular responses.

Zhenhai Liu1, Fei Wang1, Weizhi Wang1, Yanhua Luo1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to calculate the median effective concentration (EC50) of remifentanil (Rem) for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced cardiovascular responses, and to observe its effects on the cardiovascular system and stress system. The study included 20 patients, who underwent time-scheduled vocal cord polyp resection with monitoring of heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP) and auditory evoked potential (AEP)-based A-line ARX Index (AAI). The Rem concentration was initially 5 ng/ml in the first patient, and the concentration selected for each subsequent patient was calculated from the previous case on the basis of whether or not cardiovascular reactions occurred. The HR, MBP and AAI at baseline, after the induction of anesthesia, and before and after the insertion of a self-retaining laryngoscope were recorded, with a change >15% recorded as a positive cardiovascular response. The EC50 sequential method was used to calculate the EC50 of Rem for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced responses. Cortisol, interleukin-6 and blood glucose levels before and after laryngoscope insertion were also measured. The target-controlled concentrations for the 20 patients were as follows: 2 cases at 5 ng/ml, 6 cases at 4.2 ng/ml, 6 cases at 3.5 ng/ml, 4 cases at 2.9 ng/ml and 2 cases at 2.4 ng/ml. The EC50 of Rem for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced responses was 3.5 ng/ml with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.47-3.60 ng/ml. A reasonable dose for inhibiting laryngoscope-induced responses was within the range 2.9-4.2 ng/ml. In conclusion, Rem exhibited an EC50 of 3.5 ng/ml for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced cardiovascular responses, with a 95% CI of 3.47-3.60 ng/ml, and a reasonable dose for the inhibition of such responses was 2.9-4.2 ng/ml.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular responses; remifentanil; self-retaining laryngoscope; target-controlled infusion

Year:  2016        PMID: 27347078      PMCID: PMC4907039          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of Alaris AEP index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.

Authors:  S Kreuer; J Bruhn; R Larsen; M Hoepstein; W Wilhelm
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Remifentanil produces vasorelaxation in isolated rat thoracic aorta strips.

Authors:  H Unlügenç; M Itegin; I Ocal; M Ozalevli; T Güler; G Işik
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  [Laryngeal surgery-vocal cord polyp and anaesthesia].

Authors:  Eiji Yumoto
Journal:  Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho       Date:  2013-01

4.  Remifentanil: an esterase-metabolized opioid.

Authors:  T D Egan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-03

Review 5.  Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Cecilie Okholm; Jens Peter Goetze; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol. Assessment of three parameter sets.

Authors:  J F Coetzee; J B Glen; C A Wium; L Boshoff
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Laparoscopy--a stressful procedure.

Authors:  G M Cooper; A M Scoggins; I D Ward; D Murphy
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Safety analysis of endoscopist-directed propofol sedation: a prospective, national multicenter study of 24 441 patients in German outpatient practices.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg; Sebastian Beck; Sabine G Scholl; Franz J Heil; Daniel N Gotthardt; Wolfgang Stremmel; Douglas K Rex; Kilian Friedrich
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application.

Authors:  C F Minto; T W Schnider; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  The A-line ARX index may be a more sensitive detector of arousal than the bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama; Kazuo Hanaoka
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic modelling of the effect of remifentanil using the Pupillary Pain Index.

Authors:  Sérgio Vide; Ana Castro; Pedro Antunes; Deolinda Lima; Merlin Larson; Pedro Gambús; Pedro Amorim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for inhibiting the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during propofol anesthesia: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.

Authors:  Chengwei Yang; Yuanyuan Feng; Sheng Wang; Mingming Han; Song Wang; Fang Kang; Xiang Huang; Juan Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.