| Literature DB >> 27347000 |
Michal Slota1, Miroslaw Maluszynski1, Iwona Szarejko1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Barley; Hydroponics; Root imaging; Root phenotyping; Root system
Year: 2016 PMID: 27347000 PMCID: PMC4919847 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-016-0135-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Fig. 1Overview of the state-of-art methods that are used in the field of plant roots phenotyping. The available methods can be characterised as soil-grown (a–e) or artificial media (f–i) systems. a Borescope that is used to visualise plant roots, either directly in the soil or through minirhizotron tubes. b Facility used for washing the soil cores derived from field. c Rhizoboxes that act as small rhizotrons for cereal seedlings. d Transparent soil column. e Nanotom Micro-CT scanner (Phoenix/GE Systems) that is used for the 3D reconstruction of roots in soil cores. f Aeroponics system for cereal seedlings. g Rhizoscope system that is based on hydroponics and adapted for rice. h Root pouches made of a filter paper. i Agarose plates that are used to screen seedlings. b, e, h—Centre for Plant Integrative Biology, University of Nottingham, a, c, d—Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, f—Department of Genetics, University of Silesia, G, i—Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement. Phot. M. Slota]
Fig. 2Design of the system for the automatic supply of plants with the medium. a Schematic overview of the watering system that is comprised of a transformer for an afferent pump (1), afferent water pump placed in the tank with the culture medium (2), distributor of 12 outlets (3), distribution pipes (4), acrylic tubes filled with a substrate (5), efferent pump (6), transformer for efferent pump (7), drain tubing (8), air pump (9), transformer for air pump (10). b Scheme of the medium supply system of the plant: acrylic tube (11), soda-lime glass beads (12), opaque cover tube (13), distribution pipe (14), drip-line (15), plant seedling (16)
Fig. 3Pictures of the system setup. a A single module of the flood-and-drain based system that contains 48 transparent tubes, which are placed in opaque cover tubes. b A 14-day-old seedling of barley that was grown in an acrylic tube filled with glass beads. c Close-up of a fragment of the root system of barley
List of the measurements that are available using the system
| Organ | Measurements | Destructiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Shoot | ‘Green pixel area’ (cm2) | No |
| Height (cm) | No | |
| Leaf number | No | |
| Shoot fresh/dry weight (g) | Yes | |
| Root | Root system depth (cm) | No |
| Projected root surface (cm2) | No | |
| Sum of the root lengths (cm) | No | |
| Total root length (cm) | Yes | |
| Projected root area (cm2) | Yes | |
| Average root diameter (mm) | Yes | |
| Root surface area(cm2) | Yes | |
| Root volume (cm3) | Yes | |
| Lateral root density (root cm−1) | Yes | |
| Root system fresh/dry weight (g) | Yes |
Fig. 4The design of the photographic light room for plant imaging. a Schematic representation of the instrumentation. b The photographic light room at the Department of Genetics, US. The object of interest (1) is photographed against a removable background (2) when placed on a turntable (3) located at the work-bench (4). The light room is equipped with four illumination soft-boxes (5) and a fixed camera tripod (6)
Fig. 5Steps of the non-invasive imaging of root systems followed by the process of image analysis. a Root staining with powdered active charcoal. b Root imaging using a RGB camera. Pictures are taken at different positions of the rotated acrylic tube with shifts of 45°. c The process of merging the panorama picture from the single pictures using a Panorama Maker 6 (ArcSoft) software. d Analysis of the root picture using a NeuronJ plugin to ImageJ software. The tracked primary roots are marked red whereas laterals are marked pink. e Result page of the analysis carried out using a NeuronJ plugin. Result table contains the information on assigned labels and measurements (lengths in pixels)
Fig. 6Comparison of the basic parameters of root growth of 14-day-old seedlings of barley cv. ‘Sebastian’ that were grown in the developed system using vermiculite and soda-lime glass beads of different size fractions. The measured parameters included: A Total root length. B Total surface area. C Average root diameter. D Total root volume. E Average root density. Fragments of the root system images of plants that were grown on the following substrates: soda-lime glass beads of 1 mm (F), 2 mm (G), 3 mm (H) and vermiculite (I). Scale-bars included in the F–I graphs represent 50 mm. Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups
Comparison of the final concentrations of the selected elements: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and iron (Fe) in media that were tested
| Element | Final concentration in the medium (mmol) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoagland 1 | Hoagland 2 | MS | 1/2 MS | 1/4 MS | 1/8 MS | |
| N | 15 | 8 | 60.25 | 30.125 | 15.0625 | 7.53125 |
| P | 1 | 0.5 | 1.25 | 0.625 | 0.3125 | 0.15625 |
| Fe | 0.095 | 0.015 | 0.102 | 0.051 | 0.025 | 0.0125 |
The pH of the media was adjusted to ~5.9–6.1° using 1 N NaOH
Fig. 7Comparison of the root system parameters of 14-day-old barley seedlings of ‘Diva’ and ‘Karat’ cultivars as well as the rhl1.a and rhs1.a mutants that were tested using different types of media. The media that were tested were composed of the Hoagland medium (H1) and its modification with a reduced concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus (H2) and the Murashige & Skoog (MS) media concentration at 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8. The parameters that were analysed included the mean root length (A), total root surface area (B) average root diameter (C) and total root volume (D). Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups
Fig. 8Comparison of the basic parameters of root growth of 14-day-old barley seedlings cv. ‘Sebastian’ that were grown in the developed flood-and-drain based system using different diameters of the acrylic tubes. The measured parameters included: A Total root length. B Total surface area. C Average root diameter. D Total root volume. Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups
Fig. 9A radar chart presenting the correspondence between the total root length calculated using WinRHIZO software (a solid line) and a sum of the root lengths obtained using a NeuronJ plugin for ImageJ (a dashed line)
Fig. 10The kinetics of root growth of barley seedlings cv. ‘Sebastian’ under different medium flow rates. The maximal root lengths of plants were measured daily through the transparent acrylic tube surface during the 14-day experiment. The following medium flow rates were tested: 50 ml per 15, 30, 60 and 90 min