Literature DB >> 27346982

Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting.

Kwun Chuen Gary Chan1, Sheung Chi Phillip Yam2, Zheng Zhang2.   

Abstract

The estimation of average treatment effects based on observational data is extremely important in practice and has been studied by generations of statisticians under different frameworks. Existing globally efficient estimators require non-parametric estimation of a propensity score function, an outcome regression function or both, but their performance can be poor in practical sample sizes. Without explicitly estimating either functions, we consider a wide class calibration weights constructed to attain an exact three-way balance of the moments of observed covariates among the treated, the control, and the combined group. The wide class includes exponential tilting, empirical likelihood and generalized regression as important special cases, and extends survey calibration estimators to different statistical problems and with important distinctions. Global semiparametric efficiency for the estimation of average treatment effects is established for this general class of calibration estimators. The results show that efficiency can be achieved by solely balancing the covariate distributions without resorting to direct estimation of propensity score or outcome regression function. We also propose a consistent estimator for the efficient asymptotic variance, which does not involve additional functional estimation of either the propensity score or the outcome regression functions. The proposed variance estimator outperforms existing estimators that require a direct approximation of the efficient influence function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global semiparametric efficiency; Propensity score; Sieve estimator; Treatment effects

Year:  2015        PMID: 27346982      PMCID: PMC4915747          DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1369-7412            Impact factor:   4.488


  5 in total

1.  On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Maarten Bekaert; Gerda Claeskens
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.

Authors:  Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

5.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

Authors:  Weihua Cao; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.445

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Joint sufficient dimension reduction and estimation of conditional and average treatment effects.

Authors:  Ming-Yueh Huang; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Bias-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Fangfang Bai; Herbert Pang; Stephen L George
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  The Right Tool for the Job: Choosing Between Covariate-balancing and Generalized Boosted Model Propensity Scores.

Authors:  Claude M Setodji; Daniel F McCaffrey; Lane F Burgette; Daniel Almirall; Beth Ann Griffin
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Considerations for Using Multiple Imputation in Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis - A Tutorial with Applied Example.

Authors:  Andreas Halgreen Eiset; Morten Frydenberg
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 5.814

5.  Improving trial generalizability using observational studies.

Authors:  Dasom Lee; Shu Yang; Lin Dong; Xiaofei Wang; Donglin Zeng; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 1.701

6.  Kernel-based covariate functional balancing for observational studies.

Authors:  Raymond K W Wong; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Transporting experimental results with entropy balancing.

Authors:  Kevin P Josey; Seth A Berkowitz; Debashis Ghosh; Sridharan Raghavan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Yan Li; Liang Li
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.494

9.  Maternal sedentary behavior during pre-pregnancy and early pregnancy and mean offspring birth size: a cohort study.

Authors:  Sylvia E Badon; Alyson J Littman; K C Gary Chan; Michelle A Williams; Daniel A Enquobahrie
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Covariate association eliminating weights: a unified weighting framework for causal effect estimation.

Authors:  Sean Yiu; Li Su
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.