Literature DB >> 27346932

A Note on the Use of Mixture Models for Individual Prediction.

Veronica T Cole1, Daniel J Bauer1.   

Abstract

Mixture models capture heterogeneity in data by decomposing the population into latent subgroups, each of which is governed by its own subgroup-specific set of parameters. Despite the flexibility and widespread use of these models, most applications have focused solely on making inferences for whole or sub-populations, rather than individual cases. The current article presents a general framework for computing marginal and conditional predicted values for individuals using mixture model results. These predicted values can be used to characterize covariate effects, examine the fit of the model for specific individuals, or forecast future observations from previous ones. Two empirical examples are provided to demonstrate the usefulness of individual predicted values in applications of mixture models. The first example examines the relative timing of initiation of substance use using a multiple event process survival mixture model whereas the second example evaluates changes in depressive symptoms over adolescence using a growth mixture model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  growth mixture models; individual prediction; mixture models; person-centered analysis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27346932      PMCID: PMC4918771          DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1168266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling        ISSN: 1070-5511            Impact factor:   6.125


  26 in total

1.  Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Curran; Daniel J Bauer; Michael T Willoughby
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

2.  Substance use in the US college-age population: differences according to educational status and living arrangement.

Authors:  J C Gfroerer; J C Greenblatt; D A Wright
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The long-term outcome for adolescent drug users: a follow-up study of 76 users and 146 nonusers.

Authors:  L N Robins; H S Darvish; G E Murphy
Journal:  Proc Annu Meet Am Psychopathol Assoc       Date:  1970

4.  Growth Mixture Modeling: A Method for Identifying Differences in Longitudinal Change Among Unobserved Groups.

Authors:  Nilam Ram; Kevin J Grimm
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2009

5.  Evaluation of structural equation mixture models Parameter estimates and correct class assignment.

Authors:  Stephen Tueller; Gitta Lubke
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.125

6.  Detecting and Explaining Aberrant Responding to the Outcome Questionnaire-45.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Wilco H M Emons; Kim De Jong; Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2014-12-16

7.  Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data.

Authors:  S W Raudenbush
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.

Authors:  B Muthén; L K Muthén
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Using Multilevel Logistic Regression to Evaluate Person-Fit in IRT Models.

Authors:  S P Reise
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Using a shared parameter mixture model to estimate change during treatment when termination is related to recovery speed.

Authors:  Nisha C Gottfredson; Daniel J Bauer; Scott A Baldwin; John C Okiishi
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-11-25
View more
  4 in total

1.  Is the Bifactor Model a Better Model or Is It Just Better at Modeling Implausible Responses? Application of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Dale S Kim; Maxwell Mansolf; Keith F Widaman
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Trajectories of child protective services contact among Alaska Native/American Indian and non-Native children.

Authors:  Anna E Austin; Nisha C Gottfredson; Adam J Zolotor; Carolyn T Halpern; Stephen W Marshall; Rebecca B Naumann; Meghan E Shanahan
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2019-06-26

3.  Systolic Blood Pressure Response in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes): A Possible Explanation for Discordant Trial Results.

Authors:  Chenxi Huang; Sanket S Dhruva; Andreas C Coppi; Frederick Warner; Shu-Xia Li; Haiqun Lin; Khurram Nasir; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Stochastic Comparisons of Weighted Distributions and Their Mixtures.

Authors:  Abdulhakim A Albabtain; Mansour Shrahili; M A Al-Shehri; M Kayid
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.524

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.