| Literature DB >> 25520211 |
Judith M Conijn1, Wilco H M Emons2, Kim De Jong3, Klaas Sijtsma2.
Abstract
We applied item response theory based person-fit analysis (PFA) to data of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) to investigate the prevalence and causes of aberrant responding in a sample of Dutch clinical outpatients. The [Formula: see text] person-fit statistic was used to detect misfitting item-score patterns and the standardized residual statistic for identifying the source of the misfit in the item-score patterns identified as misfitting. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict person misfit from clinical diagnosis, OQ-45 total score, and Global Assessment of Functioning code. The [Formula: see text] statistic classified 12.6% of the item-score patterns as misfitting. Person misfit was positively related to the severity of psychological distress. Furthermore, patients with psychotic disorders, somatoform disorders, or substance-related disorders more likely showed misfit than the baseline group of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The results suggest that general outcome measures such as the OQ-45 are not equally appropriate for patients with different disorders. Our study emphasizes the importance of person-misfit detection in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Outcome Questionnaire–45; aberrant responding; item response theory; outcome measurement; person-fit analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25520211 DOI: 10.1177/1073191114560882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Assessment ISSN: 1073-1911