Literature DB >> 25520211

Detecting and Explaining Aberrant Responding to the Outcome Questionnaire-45.

Judith M Conijn1, Wilco H M Emons2, Kim De Jong3, Klaas Sijtsma2.   

Abstract

We applied item response theory based person-fit analysis (PFA) to data of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) to investigate the prevalence and causes of aberrant responding in a sample of Dutch clinical outpatients. The [Formula: see text] person-fit statistic was used to detect misfitting item-score patterns and the standardized residual statistic for identifying the source of the misfit in the item-score patterns identified as misfitting. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict person misfit from clinical diagnosis, OQ-45 total score, and Global Assessment of Functioning code. The [Formula: see text] statistic classified 12.6% of the item-score patterns as misfitting. Person misfit was positively related to the severity of psychological distress. Furthermore, patients with psychotic disorders, somatoform disorders, or substance-related disorders more likely showed misfit than the baseline group of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The results suggest that general outcome measures such as the OQ-45 are not equally appropriate for patients with different disorders. Our study emphasizes the importance of person-misfit detection in clinical practice.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome Questionnaire–45; aberrant responding; item response theory; outcome measurement; person-fit analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25520211     DOI: 10.1177/1073191114560882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  10 in total

1.  Identifying Person-Fit Latent Classes, and Explanation of Categorical and Continuous Person Misfit.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Klaas Sijtsma; Wilco H M Emons
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-10-30

2.  A Comprehensive Regression-Based Approach for Identifying Sources of Person Misfit in Typical-Response Measures.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando; Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Person misfit on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: Low quality self-report or true atypical symptom profile?

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Philip Spinhoven; Rob R Meijer; Femke Lamers
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-03-14

5.  Quality of Survey Responses at Older Ages Predicts Cognitive Decline and Mortality Risk.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Erik Meijer; Elizabeth M Zelinski; Haomiao Jin; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  A Note on the Use of Mixture Models for Individual Prediction.

Authors:  Veronica T Cole; Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 6.125

7.  Practical Person-Fit Assessment with the Linear FA Model: New Developments and a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando; Andreu Vigil-Colet; Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-27

8.  Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire-45 in a clinical sample.

Authors:  Ruslan Jabrayilov; Wilco H M Emons; Kim de Jong; Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Predicting Dropout from Inpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment: A Prospective Validation Study of the OQ-Analyst.

Authors:  Hanne H Brorson; Espen Ajo Arnevik; Kim Rand
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2019-08-15

10.  Satisficing in Mental Health Care Patients: The Effect of Cognitive Symptoms on Self-Report Data Quality.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; L Andries van der Ark; Philip Spinhoven
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-07-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.