Johnathon P Ehsani1, Denise L Haynie2, Christina Luthers2, Jessamyn Perlus2, Eli Gerber2, Marie Claude Ouimet3, Sheila G Klauer4, Bruce Simons-Morton5. 1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd 7B13 Bethesda, MD 20892. 2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd 7B13 Bethesda, MD 20892, Telephone: 301-435-6933. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada, Telephone: 450-463-1835. 4. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, Telephone: 540-231-1564. 5. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd 7B13 Bethesda, MD 20892, Telephone: 301-496-5674.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of peer passengers increases teenage drivers' fatal crash risk. Distraction and social influence are the two main factors that have been associated with increased risk. Teen drivers' perceptions of their peer passengers on these factors could inform our understanding of the conditions under which peer passengers increase crash risk or promote safer driving. The purpose of this study was to examine teen drivers' perceptions of their peer passengers on distraction and social influence. METHOD: A convenience sample of male and female drivers participated in a semi-structured interview that included questions on their perceptions of the effects of peer passengers on driving on distraction and social influence. The analysis of the interviews was guided by a grounded theory approach. FINDINGS: Teenage drivers were aware of the risk that peer passengers posed. Some described having passengers in the vehicle as distracting, and recognized that the level of distraction increased with the number of passengers in the vehicle. Drivers that felt responsible for the safety of their peer passengers described strategies they used to control the in-vehicle environment. Drivers described driving with passengers as a performance, and articulated direct and indirect sources of pressure, gender norms, and unspoken expectations of their passengers as influencing their driving behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of passengers is situation specific and dependent on whom the passenger(s) may be. Passenger influence may be either protective or harmful, depending on the circumstances. Some passengers exert direct influence, but often their influence appears more indirect and subtle.
BACKGROUND: The presence of peer passengers increases teenage drivers' fatal crash risk. Distraction and social influence are the two main factors that have been associated with increased risk. Teen drivers' perceptions of their peer passengers on these factors could inform our understanding of the conditions under which peer passengers increase crash risk or promote safer driving. The purpose of this study was to examine teen drivers' perceptions of their peer passengers on distraction and social influence. METHOD: A convenience sample of male and female drivers participated in a semi-structured interview that included questions on their perceptions of the effects of peer passengers on driving on distraction and social influence. The analysis of the interviews was guided by a grounded theory approach. FINDINGS: Teenage drivers were aware of the risk that peer passengers posed. Some described having passengers in the vehicle as distracting, and recognized that the level of distraction increased with the number of passengers in the vehicle. Drivers that felt responsible for the safety of their peer passengers described strategies they used to control the in-vehicle environment. Drivers described driving with passengers as a performance, and articulated direct and indirect sources of pressure, gender norms, and unspoken expectations of their passengers as influencing their driving behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of passengers is situation specific and dependent on whom the passenger(s) may be. Passenger influence may be either protective or harmful, depending on the circumstances. Some passengers exert direct influence, but often their influence appears more indirect and subtle.
Authors: Kenneth R Ginsburg; Flaura K Winston; Teresa M Senserrick; Felipe García-España; Sara Kinsman; D Alex Quistberg; James G Ross; Michael R Elliott Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marie Claude Ouimet; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Paul L Zador; Neil D Lerner; Mark Freedman; Glen D Duncan; Jing Wang Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2009-11-28
Authors: Bruce G Simons-Morton; C Raymond Bingham; Emily B Falk; Kaigang Li; Anuj K Pradhan; Marie Claude Ouimet; Farideh Almani; Jean T Shope Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Marie Claude Ouimet; Anuj K Pradhan; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Gautam Divekar; Hasmik Mehranian; Donald L Fisher Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2013-04-25