Literature DB >> 15921652

The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers.

Bruce Simons-Morton1, Neil Lerner, Jeremiah Singer.   

Abstract

The association between teenage passengers and crash risks among young drivers may be due to risky driving behavior. We investigated the effect on two measures of risky driving in the presence of young male and female passengers. Vehicles exiting from parking lots at 10 high schools were observed and the occupants were identified by gender and age (teen or adult). At a nearby site, the speed and headway of passing traffic were recorded using video and LIDAR technology. Teenage drivers drove faster than the general traffic and allowed shorter headways, particularly in the presence of a male teenage passenger. Both male and female teenage drivers allowed shorter headways (relative to no passenger or a female passenger) in the presence of a male teenage passenger, while the presence of a female teenage passenger resulted in longer headways for male teenage drivers. Overall, the observed rate of high risk driving (defined as speed > or =15 mph or more above the posted speed limit and/or headway of < or =1.0 s) for the teen male driver/male passenger condition was about double that of general traffic. In conclusion, the presence of male teenage passengers was associated with risky driving behavior among teenage drivers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15921652     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  75 in total

1.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.

Authors:  Fernando A Wilson; Jim P Stimpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Variability in crash and near-crash risk among novice teenage drivers: a naturalistic study.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Sheila E Klauer; Marie Claude Ouimet; Thomas A Dingus; Suzanne E Lee
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  A conceptual framework for reducing risky teen driving behaviors among minority youth.

Authors:  P Juarez; D G Schlundt; I Goldzweig; N Stinson
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 4.  Young driver risk factors: successful and unsuccessful approaches for dealing with them and an agenda for the future.

Authors:  A F Williams
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 5.  Influences on youthful driving behavior and their potential for guiding interventions to reduce crashes.

Authors:  J T Shope
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry.

Authors:  Jason Chein; Dustin Albert; Lia O'Brien; Kaitlyn Uckert; Laurence Steinberg
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03

7.  Age differences in resistance to peer influence.

Authors:  Laurence Steinberg; Kathryn C Monahan
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2007-11

8.  Perceived risk and other predictors and correlates of teenagers' safety belt use during the first year of licensure.

Authors:  Marie Claude Ouimet; Bruce G Simons Morton; Elizabeth A Noelcke; Allan F Williams; William A Leaf; David F Preusser; Jessica L Hartos
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.491

9.  The association of graduated driver licensing with miles driven and fatal crash rates per miles driven among adolescents.

Authors:  Motao Zhu; Peter Cummings; Songzhu Zhao; Jeffrey H Coben; Gordon S Smith
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.399

10.  Experimental effects of injunctive norms on simulated risky driving among teenage males.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; C Raymond Bingham; Emily B Falk; Kaigang Li; Anuj K Pradhan; Marie Claude Ouimet; Farideh Almani; Jean T Shope
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.