Literature DB >> 27346412

Perceptions and Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Physicians.

Dan J Raz1, Geena X Wu2, Martin Consunji2, Rebecca Nelson3, Canlan Sun4, Loretta Erhunmwunsee2, Betty Ferrell4, Virginia Sun4, Jae Y Kim2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is effective at reducing lung cancer mortality in high-risk current and former smokers. Despite the fact that screening is recommended by the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), few eligible patients are screened. We set out to study the barriers to LCS by surveying primary care physicians (PCPs).
METHODS: We surveyed a randomly selected sample of 1384 eligible PCPs between January and October 2015, using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, though surveys sent by mail, fax, and e-mail. The survey included questions regarding knowledge of LCS guidelines, utilization of LCS over the prior 12 months, and perceptions of barriers to LCS. Training background, years in practice, practice type, and demographics were also collected.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 18%. Responders and nonresponders did not differ by practice or demographic characteristics. Of the respondents, 47% indicated that LCS was recommended by the USPSTF, 52% had referred at least one patient for LDCT, and 12% had referred at least one patient to a LCS program over the prior 12 months. Perceived barriers to LCS included uncertainty regarding ther benefit of LCS, concern regarding insurance coverage, and the harm of LCS.
CONCLUSIONS: Although LCS is recommended by the USPSTF, LDCT is utilized in a minority of eligible patients, as reported by surveyed PCPs. Approximately half of PCPs are familiar with USPSTF recommendations for LCS and a number of physician barriers to adherence to guidelines exist. Additional study of physician- and system-based interventions to improve adherence to LCS recommendations is needed.
Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Lung cancer screening; NSCLC; Primary care; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27346412      PMCID: PMC5075492          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  21 in total

Review 1.  Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women.

Authors:  Irene Alexandraki; Arshag D Mooradian
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  CT screening for lung cancer: alternative definitions of positive test result based on the national lung screening trial and international early lung cancer action program databases.

Authors:  Rowena Yip; Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; James P Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Augmented meaningful use criteria to identify patients eligible for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Dan J Raz; Rachel Dunham; Brian Tiep; Argelia Sandoval; Frederic Grannis; Arnold Rotter; Jae Y Kim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Lisa Sanderson Cox; Nicole Zincke; Larina Mehta; Colleen McGuire; Edward Gelmann
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers.

Authors:  Sirisha Jonnalagadda; Cara Bergamo; Jenny J Lin; Linda Lurslurchachai; Michael Diefenbach; Cardinale Smith; Judith E Nelson; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  William C Black; Ilana F Gareen; Samir S Soneji; JoRean D Sicks; Emmett B Keeler; Denise R Aberle; Arash Naeim; Timothy R Church; Gerard A Silvestri; Jeremy Gorelick; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  An actuarial analysis shows that offering lung cancer screening as an insurance benefit would save lives at relatively low cost.

Authors:  Bruce S Pyenson; Marcia S Sander; Yiding Jiang; Howard Kahn; James L Mulshine
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Jaimee L Heffner; George Sayre; Deborah E Klein; Carol Simons; Jennifer Williams; Lynn F Reinke; David H Au
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program.

Authors:  Brady J McKee; Shawn M Regis; Andrea B McKee; Sebastian Flacke; Christoph Wald
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study.

Authors:  Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Pål R Romundstad; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-06-17
View more
  39 in total

1.  The complicated 'Yes': Decision-making processes and receptivity to lung cancer screening among head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Kimberly Dukes; Richard M Hoffman; Alan J Christensen; Nicholas Kendell; Andrew L Sussman; Miriam Veléz-Bermúdez; Robert J Volk; Nitin A Pagedar
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-04-22

2.  Changes in Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices regarding Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad S Benefield; S Caitlin Bearden; Daniel S Reuland; Alison T Brenner; Adam O Goldstein; Allison Throneburg; M Patricia Rivera
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-08

3.  Analyzing competing risks in the treatment of lung cancer: a good start.

Authors:  Jae Y Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of a Hybrid Lung Cancer Screening Model on Patient Outcomes and Provider Behavior.

Authors:  Erin A Hirsch; Melissa L New; Stephanie L Brown; Anna E Barón; Peter B Sachs; Stephen P Malkoski
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 5.  Low Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening: The Background, the Guidelines, and a Tailored Approach to Patient Care.

Authors:  Emily Tylski; Mala Goyal
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Multilevel Opportunities to Address Lung Cancer Stigma across the Cancer Control Continuum.

Authors:  Heidi A Hamann; Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve; Lisa Carter-Harris; Jamie L Studts; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: a world-wide view.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Lisa M Lowenstein; Gary M R Deyter; Shawn Nishi; Tianhao Wang; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

9.  An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Matthew Triplette; Erin K Kross; Blake A Mann; Joann G Elmore; Christopher G Slatore; Shahida Shahrir; Perrin E Romine; Paul D Frederick; Kristina Crothers
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-01

10.  Primary Care Physicians' Struggle with Current Adult Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations.

Authors:  Laura P Hurley; Mandy A Allison; Tamara Pilishvili; Sean T O'Leary; Lori A Crane; Michaela Brtnikova; Brenda L Beaty; Megan C Lindley; Carolyn B Bridges; Allison Kempe
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.