Alexandra Feast1, Esme Moniz-Cook2, Charlotte Stoner3, Georgina Charlesworth3, Martin Orrell4. 1. Division of Psychiatry,University College London,London,UK. 2. Faculty of Health and Social Care,University of Hull,Hull,UK. 3. Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology,University College London,London,UK. 4. Institute of Mental Health,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) are important predictors of institutionalization as well as caregiver burden and depression. Previous reviews have tended to group BPSD as one category with little focus on the role of the individual symptoms. This review investigates the role of the individual symptoms of BPSD in relation to the impact on different measures of family caregiver well-being. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published in English between 1980 and December 2015 reporting which BPSD affect caregiver well-being. Paper quality was appraised using the Downs and Black Checklist (1998). RESULTS: Forty medium and high quality quantitative papers met the inclusion criteria, 16 were suitable to be included in a meta-analysis of mean distress scores. Depressive behaviors were the most distressing for caregivers followed by agitation/aggression and apathy. Euphoria was the least distressing. Correlation coefficients between mean total behavior scores and mean distress scores were pooled for four studies. Irritability, aberrant motor behavior and delusions were the most strongly correlated to distress, disinhibition was the least correlated. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is not conclusive as to whether some BPSD impact caregiver well-being more than others. Studies which validly examined BPSD individually were limited, and the included studies used numerous measures of BPSD and numerous measures of caregiver well-being. Future research may benefit from a consistent measure of BPSD, examining BPSD individually, and by examining the causal mechanisms by which BPSD impact well-being by including caregiver variables so that interventions can be designed to target BPSD more effectively.
BACKGROUND: Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) are important predictors of institutionalization as well as caregiver burden and depression. Previous reviews have tended to group BPSD as one category with little focus on the role of the individual symptoms. This review investigates the role of the individual symptoms of BPSD in relation to the impact on different measures of family caregiver well-being. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published in English between 1980 and December 2015 reporting which BPSD affect caregiver well-being. Paper quality was appraised using the Downs and Black Checklist (1998). RESULTS: Forty medium and high quality quantitative papers met the inclusion criteria, 16 were suitable to be included in a meta-analysis of mean distress scores. Depressive behaviors were the most distressing for caregivers followed by agitation/aggression and apathy. Euphoria was the least distressing. Correlation coefficients between mean total behavior scores and mean distress scores were pooled for four studies. Irritability, aberrant motor behavior and delusions were the most strongly correlated to distress, disinhibition was the least correlated. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is not conclusive as to whether some BPSD impact caregiver well-being more than others. Studies which validly examined BPSD individually were limited, and the included studies used numerous measures of BPSD and numerous measures of caregiver well-being. Future research may benefit from a consistent measure of BPSD, examining BPSD individually, and by examining the causal mechanisms by which BPSD impact well-being by including caregiver variables so that interventions can be designed to target BPSD more effectively.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia; carer; dementia; neuropsychiatric symptoms; quality of life
Authors: Ann Kolanowski; Marie Boltz; Elizabeth Galik; Laura N Gitlin; Helen C Kales; Barbara Resnick; Kimberly S Van Haitsma; Amy Knehans; Jane E Sutterlin; Justine S Sefcik; Wen Liu; Darina V Petrovsky; Lauren Massimo; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Margaret MacAndrew; Glenna Brewster; Vycki Nalls; Ying-Ling Jao; Naomi Duffort; Danny Scerpella Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Sarah A Graham; Ellen E Lee; Dilip V Jeste; Ryan Van Patten; Elizabeth W Twamley; Camille Nebeker; Yasunori Yamada; Ho-Cheol Kim; Colin A Depp Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Dena Schulman-Green; Shelli L Feder; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Janene Batten; Victoria Jane En Long; Yolanda Harris; Abigail Wilpers; Tiffany Wong; Robin Whittemore Journal: J Fam Nurs Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 3.818
Authors: Marta Badia; M Begoña Orgaz; Isabel Vicario-Molina; Eva González-Ortega; María Gómez-Vela; Alba Aza; M Antonia Martín-Delgado Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.186