| Literature DB >> 27345442 |
Anna B Sikora1,2, Thomas Petzoldt3, Piotr Dawidowicz4, Eric von Elert5.
Abstract
Fatty acids contribute to the nutritional quality of the phytoplankton and, thus, play an important role in Daphnia nutrition. One of the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)--eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)--has been shown to predict carbon transfer between primary producers and consumers in lakes, suggesting that EPA limitation of Daphnia in nature is widespread. Although the demand for EPA must be covered by the diet, the demand of EPA in Daphnia that differ in body size has not been addressed yet. Here, we hypothesize that the demand for EPA in Daphnia is size-dependent and that bigger species have a higher EPA demand. To elucidate this, a growth experiment was conducted in which at 20 °C three Daphnia taxa (small-sized D. longispina complex, medium-sized D. pulicaria, and large-bodied D. magna) were fed Synechococcus elongatus supplemented with cholesterol and increasing concentrations of EPA. In addition, fatty acid analyses of Daphnia were performed. Our results show that the saturation threshold for EPA-dependent growth increased with increasing body size. This increase in thresholds with body size may provide another mechanism contributing to the prevalence of small-bodied cladocera in warm habitats and to the midsummer decline of large cladocera in eutrophic water bodies.Entities:
Keywords: Body size; Daphnia; EPA; Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Threshold
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27345442 PMCID: PMC5021750 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3675-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oecologia ISSN: 0029-8549 Impact factor: 3.225
Origin and body size at first reproduction (mm) of the experimental Daphnia clones
| Species | Clones | Origin | Body size (mm) | SE (mm) | Obtained from | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Lake Roś, Poland | 1.43 | 0.02 | T. Brzeziński | – |
|
| Lake Roś, Poland | 1.49 | 0.02 | T. Brzeziński | – | |
|
| Lake Constance, Germany | 1.59 | 0.02 | D. Martin-Creuzburg | Stich and Lampert ( | |
|
| Lake Constance, Germany | 1.77 | 0.02 | D. Martin-Creuzburg | Stich and Lampert ( | |
|
| DpBrA3 | Lake Brome, Canada | 1.90 | 0.01 | M. Ślusarczyk | Gélinas et al. ( |
| DpBrS | Lake Brome, Canada | 2.09 | 0.03 | M. Ślusarczyk | Gélinas et al. ( | |
| DpGr8 | Lake Greifen, Switzerland | 2.28 | 0.04 | P. Spaak | – | |
| DpGr49 | Lake Greifen, Switzerland | 2.31 | 0.03 | P. Spaak | – | |
|
| IL-M1-12 | Pond, Jerusalem, Israel | 3.06 | 0.02 | D. Ebert | Yampolsky et al. ( |
| IL-M1-8 | Pond, Jerusalem, Israel | 3.18 | 0.02 | D. Ebert | Yampolsky et al. ( | |
| FI-N26-8c | Lake Tvärminne, Finland | 3.33 | 0.09 | D. Ebert | Yampolsky et al. ( | |
| FI-N47-20 | Lake Tvärminne, Finland | 3.54 | 0.04 | D. Ebert | Yampolsky et al. ( |
Data are means ±1SE from 8 to 15 individuals
Half-saturation constant K S calculated with the non-linear mixed model B1 based on a Monod-like saturation function, for four clones each of three Daphnia species: the small-sized D. longispina complex, the medium-sized D. pulicaria, and the large-sized D. magna
| Species | Clones |
| SE | Half-saturation constant KS (μg EPA mg C−1) | SE | Concentration of EPA resulting in 75 % of asymptotic growth rate (μg EPA mg C−1) | SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DlE | 1.43 | 0.02 | 0.25 (0.39) | (0.50) | 0.74 (1.17) | (1.51) |
| Dl4 | 1.49 | 0.02 | 0.31 (0.45) | (0.48) | 0.93 (1.35) | (1.45) | |
| Dh | 1.59 | 0.02 | 0.41 (0.55) | (0.46) | 1.24 (1.66) | (1.39) | |
| Dg | 1.77 | 0.02 | 0.60 (0.74) | (0.46) | 1.80 (2.21) | (1.39) | |
|
| DpBrA3 | 1.90 | 0.01 | 0.74 (0.87) | (0.49) | 2.21 (2.61) | (1.48) |
| DpBrS | 2.09 | 0.03 | 0.93 (1.06) | (0.57) | 2.80 (3.19) | (1.72) | |
| DpGr8 | 2.28 | 0.04 | 1.13 (1.26) | (0.68) | 3.39 (3.77) | (2.04) | |
| DpGr49 | 2.31 | 0.03 | 1.16 (1.29) | (0.70) | 3.49 (3.87) | (2.10) | |
|
| IL-M1-12 | 3.06 | 0.02 | 1.94 (2.06) | (1.25) | 5.83 (6.53) | (3.74) |
| IL-M1-8 | 3.18 | 0.02 | 2.07 (2.18) | (1.34) | 6.21 (6.99) | (4.02) | |
| FI-N26-8c | 3.33 | 0.09 | 2.22 (2.33) | (1.46) | 6.67 (7.64) | (4.38) | |
| FI-N47-20 | 3.54 | 0.04 | 2.44 (2.55) | (1.63) | 7.33 (7.48) | (4.89) |
Depicted are concentrations of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) resulting in 75 % of asymptotic growth rate related to the baseline (g ∞−g 0)
L body size at first reproduction, SE standard error
Bootstrap estimates and standard errors are given in parentheses
Fatty acid content of Daphnia neonates (<18 h old) of two clones of the small-sized D. longispina, two clones of the medium-sized D. pulicaria, and four clones of the large-sized D. magna
| Species | Clones | Total FA (ng μg−1 dwt) | Total PUFA (ng μg−1 dwt) | Total ω-3 PUFA (ng μg−1 dwt) | Total EPA (ng μg−1 dwt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DlE | 47.36 ± 5.96 | 25.53 ± 4.13 | 24.81 ± 3.52 | 1.55 ± 0.24 |
| Dl4 | 35.80 ± 7.85 | 19.24 ± 6.50 | 17.79 ± 6.24 | 0.36 ± 0.24 | |
| Mean | 41.58 ± 5.78 | 22.39 ± 3.14 | 21.30 ± 3.51 | 1.07 ± 0.33 | |
|
| DpBrS | 37.42 ± 8.23 | 14.91 ± 5.01 | 13.48 ± 4.80 | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
| DpBrA3 | 43.35 ± 17.39 | 9.76 ± 3.27 | 8.88 ± 3.07 | 0.38 ± 0.13 | |
| Mean | 40.39 ± 2.97 | 12.34 ± 2.58 | 11.18 ± 2.30 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | |
|
| IL-M1-12 | 37.76 ± 1.94 | 20.35 ± 1.40 | 18.89 ± 1.36 | 0.34 ± 0.00 |
| IL-M1-8 | 37.26 ± 5.85 | 17.52 ± 1.88 | 16.11 ± 1.84 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | |
| FI-N26-8c | 50.16 ± 7.15 | 29.68 ± 4.61 | 27.97 ± 4.47 | 0.23 ± 0.07 | |
| FI-N47-20 | 14.81 ± 8.27 | 5.99 ± 3.94 | 5.32 ± 3.60 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | |
| Mean | 35.00 ± 7.36 | 18.38 ± 4.88 | 17.07 ± 4.67 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
Depicted are the content of total fatty acids (FA), total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), total ω-3 PUFA, and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)
Data are means ±1SE with n = 3 (6 cases) and n = 2 (2 cases)
Total PUFA is the sum of linoleic acid (18:2 ω-6), α-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3 ω-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5 ω-3), and eicosatrienoic acid (ETE; 20:3 ω-3). Total ω-3 PUFA content is the sum of α-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3 ω-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5 ω-3), and eicosatrienoic acid (ETE; 20:3 ω-3)
Fatty acid content of newly built biomass in Daphnia that had been fed with S. elongatus supplemented with cholesterol and a concentration of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) for 6 days, resulting in 75 % of asymptotic growth rate (see Table 4)
| Species | Clones | Total FA (ng μg−1 dwt) | Total PUFA (ng μg−1 dwt) | Total ω-3 PUFA (ng μg−1 dwt) | Total EPA (ng μg−1 dwt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DlE | 9.23 ± 0.00 | nd | nd | nd |
| Dl4 | 52.56 ± 33.68 | 5.53 ± 3.92 | 5.03 ± 3.65 | 0.78 ± 0.30 | |
| Mean | 38.12 ± 24.22 | – | – | – | |
|
| DpBrS | 79.46 ± 11.30 | 0.96 ± 0.21 | 1.01 ± 0.22 | 0.25 ± 0.12 |
| DpBrA3 | 99.55 ± 8.48 | 2.59 ± 0.58 | 2.20 ± 0.57 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | |
| Mean | 89.51 ± 7.75 | 1.77 ± 0.46 | 1.61 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | |
|
| IL-M1-12 | 27.51 ± 6.28 | 1.71 ± 0.09 | 1.34 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.18 |
| IL-M1-8 | 47.99 ± 13.08 | 2.45 ± 0.78 | 2.08 ± 0.74 | 1.22 ± 0.50 | |
| FI-N26-8c | 69.43 ± 5.44 | 2.64 ± 1.44 | 1.42 ± 0.95 | 1.86 ± 1.16 | |
| FI-N47-20 | 64.28 ± 3.37 | 2.21 ± 0.04 | 1.82 ± 0.05 | 0.24 ± 0.07 | |
| Mean | 52.30 ± 5.98 | 2.22 ± 0.29 | 1.67 ± 0.27 | 1.05 ± 0.33 |
Depicted are the content of total fatty acids (FA), total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), total ω-3 PUFAs, and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) for two clones of the small-sized D. longispina, two clones of the medium-sized D. pulicaria, and four clones of the large-sized D. magna
Data are means ±1 SE with n = 3 (6 cases) and n = 2 (1 case) and n = 1 (1 case)
Total PUFA is the sum of linoleic acid (18:2 ω-6), α-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3 ω-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5 ω-3), and eicosatrienoic acid (ETE; 20:3 ω-3). Total ω-3 PUFA content is the sum of α-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3 ω-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5 ω-3), and eicosatrienoic acid (ETE; 20:3 ω-3)
nd not detected
Model selection and likelihood ratio tests of non-linear mixed models based on a Monod-like saturation function
| Model | Model parameters |
| AIC | LogLik | Chisq | Chi |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effect | Clonal random | |||||||
| A3 |
|
| 7 | −1116.5 | 565.3 | 5.73 | 1 | 0.017 |
| B3 |
|
| 8 | −1120.2 | 568.1 | |||
| A2 |
|
| 6 | −1118.5 | 565.3 | 5.73 | 1 | 0.017 |
| B2 |
|
| 7 | −1122.2 | 568.1 | |||
| A1 |
|
| 5 | −1120.3 | 565.2 | 5.27 | 1 | 0.022 |
| B1 |
|
| 6 | −1123.6 | 567.8 | |||
Model type A: common half-saturation constant for all clones (models A1, A2) or non-systematically varying due to a clonal random effect (A3), model type B: size dependency of K S = K 0 + K L ·L
Df degrees of freedom of the model, AIC Akaike information criterion, LogLik logarithm of maximum likelihood
The p-values indicate that models with size-dependent K S (models B) are significantly superior to their corresponding model of type A (Chi-square likelihood ratio test)
Fig. 1Juvenile growth rate at 20 °C and non-linear regression lines for Daphnia clones that had been fed with S. elongatus supplemented with cholesterol and increasing concentrations of EPA. The non-linear fits were obtained with the mixed model A3 where all parameters (K S, g 0, and g ∞) were allowed to vary randomly between clones: a small-sized D. longispina complex (N = 10), b medium-sized D. pulicaria (N = 10), and c large-sized D. magna (N = 5)
Mean juvenile growth rates at 20 °C in the control treatment for Daphnia clones that had been fed with (1) the green algae Chlamydomonas klinobasis, (2) the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus without any liposomes, and (3) S. elongatus with control liposomes of a concentration equivalent to the total concentration of cholesterol- and EPA-liposmoes added to the food treatment with 10 μg EPA mg C−1
| Species | Clones | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DlE | 0.268 ± 0.002 | 0.089 ± 0.029 | 0.196 ± 0.073 |
| Dl4 | 0.318 ± 0.004 | 0.028 ± 0.018 | 0.056 ± 0.029 | |
| Dh | 0.247 ± 0.003 | 0.078 ± 0.022 | 0.057 ± 0.012 | |
| Dg | 0.320 ± 0.032 | 0.092 ± 0.005 | 0.089 ± 0.007 | |
|
| DpBrA3 | 0.288 ± 0.008 | 0.107 ± 0.008 | 0.099 ± 0.019 |
| DpBrS | 0.347 ± 0.010 | 0.135 ± 0.026 | 0.084 ± 0.011 | |
| DpGr8 | 0.460 ± 0.006 | 0.062 ± 0.012 | 0.088 ± 0.053 | |
| DpGr49 | 0.484 ± 0.010 | 0.057 ± 0.004 | 0.079 ± 0.006 | |
|
| IL-M1-12 | 0.534 ± 0.008 | 0.102 ± 0.004 | 0.087 ± 0.013 |
| IL-M1-8 | 0.542 ± 0.002 | 0.118 ± 0.005 | 0.132 ± 0.003 | |
| FI-N26-8c | 0.559 ± 0.014 | 0.137 ± 0.008 | 0.114 ± 0.010 | |
| FI-N47-20 | 0.537 ± 0.014 | 0.088 ± 0.012 | 0.099 ± 0.009 |
Depicted are mean juvenile growth rates for four clones each of three Daphnia species: the small-sized D. longispina complex, the medium-sized D. pulicaria, and the large-sized D. magna
Data are means ±1 SE with n = 3
Fig. 2Juvenile growth rate at 20 °C and non-linear regression lines for Daphnia that had been fed with S. elongatus supplemented with cholesterol and increasing concentrations of EPA (N = 10 a–h and N = 5 i–l). The non-linear fits were obtained with the mixed model B1 with a clonal random effect for g 0 and a body size-dependent half-saturation constant K S, see inset figure (m). Note different scaling of Y-axis between the three species (rows)