Literature DB >> 27342870

Da Vinci Xi and Si platforms have equivalent perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience.

Ali Abdel Raheem1,2, Abulhasan Sheikh1, Dae Keun Kim3, Atalla Alatawi1, Ibrahim Alabdulaali1, Woong Kyu Han1, Young Deuk Choi1, Koon Ho Rha4.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the perioperative outcomes of da Vinci Xi to Si during robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and to discuss the feasibility of our novel port placement scheme for the da Vinci Xi platform, to overcome the existing kinetic and technical difficulties we faced with the linear port placement in patients with a small body habitus. A retrospective data analysis of patients who underwent RPN using da Vinci Xi (n = 18) was carried out. The outcomes of the Xi group were compared with the Si group (n = 18) selected using a case-matched methodology. For da Vinci Xi, we applied the universal linear port placement in 12 patients and our modified port placement in the remaining 6 patients. The Xi group had a shorter mean docking time of 17.8 ± 2.6 min compared to the Si group of 20.5 ± 2.1 min (p = 0.002); otherwise, no significant difference was present with regard to the remaining perioperative variables (p > 0.05). The modified Xi port placement had a shorter mean console time of 70.8 ± 9.7 min compared to the universal linear port placement of 89.3 ± 17.2 min (p = 0.03). Moreover, it provided a broader field of vision with excellent robotic arms movement, minimizing collisions and allowing an easier and comfortable surgical assist. Da Vinci Xi appears to be feasible and safe during RPN with similar outcomes to Si. The novel Xi port placement makes surgery easier in patients with low BMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci Xi; Partial nephrectomy; Port placement; Robotic surgery and renal tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342870     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0612-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  17 in total

1.  Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Ali Khalifeh; Riccardo Autorino; Shahab P Hillyer; Humberto Laydner; Remi Eyraud; Kamol Panumatrassamee; Jean-Alexandre Long; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Robotics applied in laparoscopic kidney surgery: the Yonsei University experience of 127 cases.

Authors:  Enrique Ian S Lorenzo; Wooju Jeong; Cheol Kyu Oh; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Advancement of technology and its impact on urologists: release of the daVinci Xi, a new surgical robot.

Authors:  Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jie Cai; Matthew N Simmons; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Silvia Secco; Veronica Macchi; Andrea Porzionato; Raffaele De Caro; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: complications and functional and oncologic outcomes during a 4-year median period of follow-up.

Authors:  Christos Komninos; Tae Young Shin; Patrick Tuliao; Dae Keun Kim; Woong Kyu Han; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Choi; Ji Hye You; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenjie Wu; Mingmin Li; Bing Liu; Chen Cai; Huamao Ye; Chen Lv; Qing Yang; Jing Sheng; Shangqing Song; Le Qu; Liang Xiao; Yinghao Sun; Linhui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Robotic Partial Nephrectomy with the Da Vinci Xi.

Authors:  George J S Kallingal; Sanjaya Swain; Fadi Darwiche; Sanoj Punnen; Murugesan Manoharan; Mark L Gonzalgo; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-02-09
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maurizio Zizzo; Magda Zanelli; Francesca Sanguedolce; Federica Torricelli; Andrea Morini; David Tumiati; Federica Mereu; Antonia Lavinia Zuliani; Andrea Palicelli; Stefano Ascani; Alessandro Giunta
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Similar Operative Outcomes between the da Vinci Xi® and da Vinci Si® Systems in Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Seohee Choi; Chul-Kyu Roh; Won Jun Seo; Minah Cho; Taeil Son; Hyung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.720

3.  An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants.

Authors:  Baptiste Marçon; Willy Ngueyon Sime; Francis Guillemin; Nicolas Hubert; François Lagrange; Céline Huselstein; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-09-27

4.  A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kun-Yang Lei; Wen-Jie Xie; Sheng-Qiang Fu; Ming Ma; Ting Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  First completely robot-assisted retroperitoneal nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff: a step-by-step technique.

Authors:  P Sparwasser; S Epple; A Thomas; R Dotzauer; K Boehm; M P Brandt; R Mager; H Borgmann; M M Kamal; M Kurosch; T Höfner; A Haferkamp; I Tsaur
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 6.  Retroperitoneal Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Fabio Crocerossa; Riccardo Campi; Alessandro Veccia; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Daniele Amparore; Enrico Checcucci; Davide Loizzo; Angela Pecoraro; Michele Marchioni; Chiara Lonati; Chandru P Sundaram; Reza Mehrazin; James Porter; Jihad H Kaouk; Francesco Porpiglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

7.  Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site upper urinary tract surgery with da Vinci Xi surgical system: Initial experience.

Authors:  Hyung Ho Lee; Joon Chae Na; Young Eun Yoon; Koon Ho Rha; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-02-28

8.  Radical prostatectomy technique in the robotic evolution: from da Vinci standard to single port-a single surgeon pathway.

Authors:  Simone Francavilla; Alessandro Veccia; Ryan W Dobbs; Fabio Zattoni; Hari T Vigneswaran; Alessandro Antonelli; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Riccardo Autorino; Claudio Simeone; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-02-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.