Miriam W Tsao1, Sylvie D Cornacchi1, Nicole Hodgson1,2, Marko Simunovic1,2,3, Lehana Thabane3,4, Ji Cheng4, Mary Ann O'Brien5, Barbara Strang6, Som D Mukherjee6, Peter J Lovrics7,8,9. 1. Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Hamilton Health Sciences and Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 4. Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 7. Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. lovricsp@mcmaster.ca. 8. Department of Surgical Oncology, Hamilton Health Sciences and Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada. lovricsp@mcmaster.ca. 9. Department of Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada. lovricsp@mcmaster.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Evidence from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial suggests completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (+SLNB) does not improve outcomes in select patients, leading to practice variation. A multidisciplinary group of surgeons, oncologists, and pathologists developed a regional guideline for cALND which was disseminated in August 2012. We assessed the impact of Z0011 and the regional guideline on cALND rates. METHODS: Consecutive invasive breast cancer cases undergoing SLNB were reviewed at 12 hospitals. Patient, tumor, and process measures were collected for three time periods: TP1, before publication of Z0011 (May 2009-August 2010); TP2, after publication of Z0011 (March 2011-June 2012); and TP3, after guideline dissemination (January 2013-April 2014). Cases were categorized by whether they met the guideline criteria for cALND (i.e. ≤50 years, mastectomy, T3 tumor, three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes [SLNs]) or not (e.g. age > 50 years, breast-conserving surgery, T1/T2 tumor, and one to two positive SLNs). RESULTS: The SLNB rate increased from 56 % (n = 620), to 70 % (n = 774), to 78 % (n = 844) in TP1, TP2, and TP3, respectively. Among cases not recommended for cALND using the guideline criteria, cALND rates decreased significantly over time (TP1, 71 %; TP2, 43 %; TP3, 17 %) [p < 0.001]. The cALND rate also decreased over time among cases recommended to have cALND using the guideline criteria (TP1, 92 %; TP2, 69 %; TP3, 58 %) [p < 0.001]. Based on multivariable analysis, age and nodal factors appeared to be significant factors for cALND decision making. CONCLUSION: Publication of ACOSOG Z0011 and regional guideline dissemination were associated with a marked decrease in cALND after +SLNB, even among several cases in which the guideline recommended cALND.
INTRODUCTION: Evidence from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial suggests completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (+SLNB) does not improve outcomes in select patients, leading to practice variation. A multidisciplinary group of surgeons, oncologists, and pathologists developed a regional guideline for cALND which was disseminated in August 2012. We assessed the impact of Z0011 and the regional guideline on cALND rates. METHODS: Consecutive invasive breast cancer cases undergoing SLNB were reviewed at 12 hospitals. Patient, tumor, and process measures were collected for three time periods: TP1, before publication of Z0011 (May 2009-August 2010); TP2, after publication of Z0011 (March 2011-June 2012); and TP3, after guideline dissemination (January 2013-April 2014). Cases were categorized by whether they met the guideline criteria for cALND (i.e. ≤50 years, mastectomy, T3 tumor, three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes [SLNs]) or not (e.g. age > 50 years, breast-conserving surgery, T1/T2 tumor, and one to two positive SLNs). RESULTS: The SLNB rate increased from 56 % (n = 620), to 70 % (n = 774), to 78 % (n = 844) in TP1, TP2, and TP3, respectively. Among cases not recommended for cALND using the guideline criteria, cALND rates decreased significantly over time (TP1, 71 %; TP2, 43 %; TP3, 17 %) [p < 0.001]. The cALND rate also decreased over time among cases recommended to have cALND using the guideline criteria (TP1, 92 %; TP2, 69 %; TP3, 58 %) [p < 0.001]. Based on multivariable analysis, age and nodal factors appeared to be significant factors for cALND decision making. CONCLUSION: Publication of ACOSOG Z0011 and regional guideline dissemination were associated with a marked decrease in cALND after +SLNB, even among several cases in which the guideline recommended cALND.
Authors: Fabian Riedel; Jörg Heil; Manuel Feißt; Mahdi Rezai; Mareike Moderow; Christof Sohn; Florian Schütz; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: S David Nathanson; David Krag; Henry M Kuerer; Lisa A Newman; Markus Brown; Dontscho Kerjaschki; Ethel R Pereira; Timothy P Padera Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Karla V Ballman; Linda McCall; Peter D Beitsch; Meghan B Brennan; Pond R Kelemen; David W Ollila; Nora M Hansen; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anna Weiss; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Sarah M DeSnyder; Rosa F Hwang; Vivian Bea; Isabelle Bedrosian; Karen Hoffman; Beatriz Adrade; Aysegul A Sahin; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt; Abigail S Caudle Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Amelie de Gregorio; Peter Widschwendter; Susanne Albrecht; Nikolaus de Gregorio; Thomas W P Friedl; Jens Huober; Wolfgang Janni; Florian K Ebner Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: J M Simons; L B Koppert; E J T Luiten; C C van der Pol; S Samiei; J H W de Wilt; S Siesling; M L Smidt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872