| Literature DB >> 27342571 |
Masahiro Sakita1, Shinichiro Murakami2, Hidemi Fujino3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regression of myelinated peripheral nerve fibers in the lower extremities contributes to sarcopenia and balance dysfunction in normal aging. This subclinical regression of myelinated fibers (MFs) is heavily influenced by alterations in microvasculature, though the mechanism underlying these age-related degenerative phenomena remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to examine age-related regressions in myelinated distal peripheral nerve fibers as well as capillary architecture in rats using both morphological and histochemical methods.Entities:
Keywords: Capillary; Myelinated fiber; Three-dimensional image; Tibial nerve
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27342571 PMCID: PMC4919893 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-016-0277-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Fig. 1Histogram depicting the distribution of the diameter of myelinated fibers in the distal tibial nerve of young rats (black bars) and elderly rats (white bars). Note that a number of small myelinated fibers for the elderly group are larger than those of the young group, which indicates that the histogram for the elderly group shifted to the left in comparison with that of the young group (P < 0.01)
Characteristics of the three myelinated fiber sizes in the young and elderly groups
| Fiber size | Large myelinated fiber | Medium myelinated fiber | Small myelinated fiber | Regression coefficient | Intercept | R2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Young (20 weeks old) | Elderly (90 weeks old) | Medium myelinated fiber | Elderly (90 weeks old) | Young (20 weeks old) | Elderly (90 weeks old) | Young (20 weeks old) | Elderly (90 weeks old) | Young (20 weeks old) | Elderly (90 weeks old) | |
| Fiber diameter (μm)a,b,c | 7.67 ± 0.54 | 4.42 ± 0.27** | 3.96 ± 0.09 | 2.33 ± 0.09** | 3.12 ± 0.06 | 1.50 ± 0.04** | −2.27 | −1.46 | 9.46 | 5.67 | 0.54 |
| Myelin thickness (μm)a,b,c | 1.13 ± 0.06 | 0.81 ± 0.04** | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.01** | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.01** | −0.32 | −0.22 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 0.52 |
| Axon diameter (μm)a,b,c | 5.02 ± 0.45 | 2.81 ± 0.21** | 2.23 ± 0.07 | 1.31 ± 0.06** | 1.63 ± 0.05 | 0.76 ± 0.03** | −1.69 | −1.02 | 6.34 | 3.67 | 0.46 |
| Myelin perimeter (μm)a,b,c | 21.85 ± 1.76 | 14.08 ± 0.80** | 10.99 ± 0.38 | 7.89 ± 0.22** | 7.69 ± 0.26 | 5.41 ± 0.13** | −6.57 | −4.34 | 26.99 | 17.80 | 0.47 |
| Axon perimeter (μm)a,b,c | 16.06 ± 1.40 | 9.29 ± 0.65** | 7.43 ± 0.35 | 4.46 ± 0.19** | 5.63 ± 0.29 | 2.70 ± 0.08** | −5.21 | −3.3 | 20.12 | 12.07 | 0.46 |
| G-ratioa | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | −0.05 | −0.05 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.21 |
Fiber diameter, myelin thickness, axon diameter, myelin perimeter, axon perimeter and G-ratio of the young and elderly groups for the three myelinated fiber sizes (large, medium, and small myelinated fibers). Regression coefficients and intercepts indicate those of regression lines on total fiber diameter, myelin thickness, axon diameter, myelin perimeter, axon perimeter, and g-ratio for the young and elderly groups. R2 indicates determination coefficient of a two-way ANOVA
** Significant difference between the young and elderly groups with Tukey–Kramer post hoc test (P < 0.01). Values of fiber diameter, myelin thickness, axon diameter, myelin perimeter, axon perimeter and g-ratio for the young and elderly groups according to fiber size (large, medium, and small myelinated fibers) are presented as mean ± SEM
aMain effect on the size myelinated fiber with a two-way ANOVA (P < 0.0001)
bMain effect on the group with a two-way ANOVA (P < 0.0001)
cInteraction of the size myelinated fiber and group with a two-way ANOVA (P < 0.01)
Fig. 2Comparison between the young and elderly groups regarding characteristics of myelinated fiber types. The elderly group had a smaller fiber diameter (a), myelin thickness (b), axon diameter (c), myelin perimeter (d), and axon perimeter (e) for all MF sizes (large, medium, and small) in when compared with the young group (f). No significant differences between the young and elderly groups were observed for any fiber size with respect to G-ratio. Open and filled columns in each graph indicate mean values of large, medium, and small myelinated fiber sizes. Y and E in each graph indicate fitted regression lines for the young and elderly groups, respectively (See Table 1 to confirm the regression coefficients and intercepts related to regression lines of the young and elderly groups with respect to each factor). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, young versus elderly. MF myelinated fiber
Fig. 3Cross-sectional images of the tibial nerve stained with 1 % toluidine blue. The black arrows indicate myelinated fibers. Each densely stained outer ring indicates a myelin sheath. The myelin sheaths and axons of the myelinated fibers in a young rat appear to be thicker and larger than those of an elderly rat (a a young rat, b an elderly rat). Scale bar 10 μm
Fig. 4Histogram indicating the distribution of capillary diameter in the distal tibial nerve of young (black columns) and elderly (white columns) rats. Note that a number of small capillaries for the elderly group are larger than that of the young group, which indicates that the histogram for the elderly group shifted to the left with respect to that of the young group
Fig. 5Comparison between the young and elderly groups in capillary diameter and microvascular branch points of the intra-tibial nerve. a Mean capillary diameter of the elderly was significantly smaller in comparison to that of the young group (P < 0.01). b The mean number of microvascular branch points for the elderly group was significantly decreased in comparison to that observed for the young group (P < 0.01). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, young versus elderly
Fig. 6The three-dimensional architecture images of capillaries in the tibial nerve captured by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Each stacked image represents a sagittal view. Upper and lower parts of the images correspond to the proximal and distal parts of the distal tibial nerve, respectively. The white arrows indicate the microvascular ramifications. The capillaries of the intra-tibial nerve in a young rat seemed to be more compact than those of an elderly rat (a a young rat, b an elderly rat). Scale bar 100 μm