Karl Haslam1, Mark A Catherwood2, Edwina Dobbin3,4, Anne Sproul3, Stephen E Langabeer5, Ken I Mills2. 1. Cancer Molecular Diagnostics, Central Pathology Laboratory, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. khaslam@stjames.ie. 2. Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University, Belfast, UK. 3. Department of Haematology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK. 4. Almac Diagnostics, Craigavon, UK. 5. Cancer Molecular Diagnostics, Central Pathology Laboratory, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disorder often associated with dismal overall survival. The clinical diversity of AML is reflected in the range of recurrent somatic mutations in several genes, many of which have a prognostic and therapeutic value. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of these genes has the potential for translation into clinical practice. In order to assess this potential, an inter-laboratory evaluation of a commercially available AML gene panel across three diagnostic centres in the UK and Ireland was performed. METHODS: DNA from six AML patient samples was distributed to each centre and processed using a standardised workflow, including a common sequencing platform, sequencing chips and bioinformatics pipeline. A duplicate sample in each centre was run to assess inter- and intra-laboratory performance. RESULTS: An average sample read depth of 2725X (range 629-5600) was achieved using six samples per chip, with some variability observed in the depth of coverage generated for individual samples and between centres. A total of 16 somatic mutations were detected in the six AML samples, with a mean of 2.7 mutations per sample (range 1-4) representing nine genes on the panel. 15/16 mutations were identified by all three centres. Allelic frequencies of the mutations ranged from 5.6 to 53.3 % (median 44.4 %), with a high level of concordance of these frequencies between centres, for mutations detected. CONCLUSION: In this inter-laboratory comparison, a high concordance, reproducibility and robustness was demonstrated using a commercially available NGS AML gene panel and platform.
INTRODUCTION:Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disorder often associated with dismal overall survival. The clinical diversity of AML is reflected in the range of recurrent somatic mutations in several genes, many of which have a prognostic and therapeutic value. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of these genes has the potential for translation into clinical practice. In order to assess this potential, an inter-laboratory evaluation of a commercially available AML gene panel across three diagnostic centres in the UK and Ireland was performed. METHODS: DNA from six AMLpatient samples was distributed to each centre and processed using a standardised workflow, including a common sequencing platform, sequencing chips and bioinformatics pipeline. A duplicate sample in each centre was run to assess inter- and intra-laboratory performance. RESULTS: An average sample read depth of 2725X (range 629-5600) was achieved using six samples per chip, with some variability observed in the depth of coverage generated for individual samples and between centres. A total of 16 somatic mutations were detected in the six AML samples, with a mean of 2.7 mutations per sample (range 1-4) representing nine genes on the panel. 15/16 mutations were identified by all three centres. Allelic frequencies of the mutations ranged from 5.6 to 53.3 % (median 44.4 %), with a high level of concordance of these frequencies between centres, for mutations detected. CONCLUSION: In this inter-laboratory comparison, a high concordance, reproducibility and robustness was demonstrated using a commercially available NGS AML gene panel and platform.
Authors: John S Welch; Timothy J Ley; Daniel C Link; Christopher A Miller; David E Larson; Daniel C Koboldt; Lukas D Wartman; Tamara L Lamprecht; Fulu Liu; Jun Xia; Cyriac Kandoth; Robert S Fulton; Michael D McLellan; David J Dooling; John W Wallis; Ken Chen; Christopher C Harris; Heather K Schmidt; Joelle M Kalicki-Veizer; Charles Lu; Qunyuan Zhang; Ling Lin; Michelle D O'Laughlin; Joshua F McMichael; Kim D Delehaunty; Lucinda A Fulton; Vincent J Magrini; Sean D McGrath; Ryan T Demeter; Tammi L Vickery; Jasreet Hundal; Lisa L Cook; Gary W Swift; Jerry P Reed; Patricia A Alldredge; Todd N Wylie; Jason R Walker; Mark A Watson; Sharon E Heath; William D Shannon; Nobish Varghese; Rakesh Nagarajan; Jacqueline E Payton; Jack D Baty; Shashikant Kulkarni; Jeffery M Klco; Michael H Tomasson; Peter Westervelt; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; John F DiPersio; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson Journal: Cell Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Francesco Buccisano; Luca Maurillo; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Giovanni Del Poeta; Giuseppe Sconocchia; Francesco Lo-Coco; William Arcese; Sergio Amadori; Adriano Venditti Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jeffery M Klco; Christopher A Miller; Malachi Griffith; Allegra Petti; David H Spencer; Shamika Ketkar-Kulkarni; Lukas D Wartman; Matthew Christopher; Tamara L Lamprecht; Nicole M Helton; Eric J Duncavage; Jacqueline E Payton; Jack Baty; Sharon E Heath; Obi L Griffith; Dong Shen; Jasreet Hundal; Gue Su Chang; Robert Fulton; Michelle O'Laughlin; Catrina Fronick; Vincent Magrini; Ryan T Demeter; David E Larson; Shashikant Kulkarni; Bradley A Ozenberger; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; Peter Westervelt; Jerald P Radich; Daniel C Link; Elaine R Mardis; John F DiPersio; Richard K Wilson; Timothy J Ley Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Adam Ivey; Robert K Hills; Michael A Simpson; Jelena V Jovanovic; Amanda Gilkes; Angela Grech; Yashma Patel; Neesa Bhudia; Hassan Farah; Joanne Mason; Kerry Wall; Susanna Akiki; Michael Griffiths; Ellen Solomon; Frank McCaughan; David C Linch; Rosemary E Gale; Paresh Vyas; Sylvie D Freeman; Nigel Russell; Alan K Burnett; David Grimwade Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Clare M McCourt; Darragh G McArt; Ken Mills; Mark A Catherwood; Perry Maxwell; David J Waugh; Peter Hamilton; Joe M O'Sullivan; Manuel Salto-Tellez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rick Kamps; Rita D Brandão; Bianca J van den Bosch; Aimee D C Paulussen; Sofia Xanthoulea; Marinus J Blok; Andrea Romano Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Mireille Crampe; Karl Haslam; Emma Groarke; Eileen Kelleher; Derville O'Shea; Eibhlin Conneally; Stephen E Langabeer Journal: Case Rep Hematol Date: 2017-10-16
Authors: Lesley-Ann Sutton; Viktor Ljungström; Anna Enjuanes; Diego Cortese; Aron Skaftason; Eugen Tausch; Katerina Stano Kozubik; Ferran Nadeu; Marine Armand; Jikta Malcikova; Tatjana Pandzic; Jade Forster; Zadie Davis; David Oscier; Davide Rossi; Paolo Ghia; Jonathan C Strefford; Sarka Pospisilova; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Frederic Davi; Elias Campo; Kostas Stamatopoulos; Richard Rosenquist Journal: Haematologica Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 9.941