BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In the last decade, a number of genes have been reported to be recurrently associated with myeloid malignancies. While some mutations are easily detectable by conventional molecular genetics methods, other mutations are more difficult to screen because of lower frequency and being scattered along large genomic ranges. However, newly developed approaches for next-generation sequencing provide an affordable solution for targeted multiplex resequencing of up to several hundreds of amplicons. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a novel custom panel for targeted resequencing of myeloid malignancy samples using the Ion PGM(™) System (Ion Torrent, Paisley, UK). METHODS: We designed a pool of 424 primers for the amplification of 212 amplicons covering 99.46 % of the exonic regions of nine human genes as follows: ASXL1, EZH2, CALR, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2, and U2AF1. Initial testing of the panel performance was performed on an Ion PGM(™) machine using PGM(™) 316 v2 chips on 16 DNA samples from patients with myeloid malignancies. Sequence alignment, variant calling, and annotation were performed using Ion Reporter software. RESULTS: We identified a total of 14 nonsynonymous somatic coding variants in seven samples affecting six of the genes in the panel (ASXL1, CALR, RUNX1, SRSF2, TET2, and U2AF1). Notably, three of the identified mutations were not present in the Cosmic v.67 release. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study confirms the feasibility of Ion Torrent systems for resequencing of clinically relevant mutations in myeloid malignancies. It can be particularly useful in cases without the most frequent clonal markers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In the last decade, a number of genes have been reported to be recurrently associated with myeloid malignancies. While some mutations are easily detectable by conventional molecular genetics methods, other mutations are more difficult to screen because of lower frequency and being scattered along large genomic ranges. However, newly developed approaches for next-generation sequencing provide an affordable solution for targeted multiplex resequencing of up to several hundreds of amplicons. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a novel custom panel for targeted resequencing of myeloid malignancy samples using the Ion PGM(™) System (Ion Torrent, Paisley, UK). METHODS: We designed a pool of 424 primers for the amplification of 212 amplicons covering 99.46 % of the exonic regions of nine human genes as follows: ASXL1, EZH2, CALR, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2, and U2AF1. Initial testing of the panel performance was performed on an Ion PGM(™) machine using PGM(™) 316 v2 chips on 16 DNA samples from patients with myeloid malignancies. Sequence alignment, variant calling, and annotation were performed using Ion Reporter software. RESULTS: We identified a total of 14 nonsynonymous somatic coding variants in seven samples affecting six of the genes in the panel (ASXL1, CALR, RUNX1, SRSF2, TET2, and U2AF1). Notably, three of the identified mutations were not present in the Cosmic v.67 release. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study confirms the feasibility of Ion Torrent systems for resequencing of clinically relevant mutations in myeloid malignancies. It can be particularly useful in cases without the most frequent clonal markers.
Authors: A Kohlmann; N Nadarajah; T Alpermann; V Grossmann; S Schindela; F Dicker; A Roller; W Kern; C Haferlach; S Schnittger; T Haferlach Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Rafael Bejar; Kristen Stevenson; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Naomi Galili; Björn Nilsson; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Azra Raza; Ross L Levine; Donna Neuberg; Benjamin L Ebert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pontus Lundberg; Axel Karow; Ronny Nienhold; Renate Looser; Hui Hao-Shen; Ina Nissen; Sabine Girsberger; Thomas Lehmann; Jakob Passweg; Martin Stern; Christian Beisel; Robert Kralovics; Radek C Skoda Journal: Blood Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Christina A Ortmann; David G Kent; Jyoti Nangalia; Yvonne Silber; David C Wedge; Jacob Grinfeld; E Joanna Baxter; Charles E Massie; Elli Papaemmanuil; Suraj Menon; Anna L Godfrey; Danai Dimitropoulou; Paola Guglielmelli; Beatriz Bellosillo; Carles Besses; Konstanze Döhner; Claire N Harrison; George S Vassiliou; Alessandro Vannucchi; Peter J Campbell; Anthony R Green Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael A Quail; Miriam Smith; Paul Coupland; Thomas D Otto; Simon R Harris; Thomas R Connor; Anna Bertoni; Harold P Swerdlow; Yong Gu Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Clare M McCourt; Darragh G McArt; Ken Mills; Mark A Catherwood; Perry Maxwell; David J Waugh; Peter Hamilton; Joe M O'Sullivan; Manuel Salto-Tellez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karl Haslam; Mark A Catherwood; Edwina Dobbin; Anne Sproul; Stephen E Langabeer; Ken I Mills Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.074