Literature DB >> 27340918

Stroke incidence in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remotely controlled with automatic alerts of atrial fibrillation. A sub-analysis of the HomeGuide study.

Renato Pietro Ricci1, Diego Vaccari2, Loredana Morichelli3, Gabriele Zanotto4, Leonardo Calò5, Antonio D'Onofrio6, Antonio Curnis7, Ennio C L Pisanò8, René Nangah9, Marco Brieda10, Vittorio Calzolari11, Donato Melissano12, Nicola Rovai13, Alessio Gargaro13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remote Monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in management of Atrial Fibrillation (AF), which is a recognized risk factor for thromboembolism. We tried to elucidate whether stroke incidence observed in a large, remotely monitored population was consistent with the CHA2DS2VASc risk profile.
METHODS: Data from 1650 patients [76% male, age 72 (63-68), CHA2DS2VASc score 3.0 (2.0-4.0)] enrolled during the HomeGuide study and monitored with a daily-transmission RM system providing automatic alerts for AF, were analysed. Of those, 25% had a pacemaker and 75% an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with or without cardiac resynchronization. Estimations of the expected thromboembolic events were based on the population CHA2DS2VASc score profile used in a computer-simulated Markov model.
RESULTS: Eight thromboembolic events were observed with a 4-year cumulative stroke rate of 0.8% (confidence interval, 0.4%-1.5%). Simulations returned from 18.7 to 17.1 expected events, depending on the AF duration assumed to trigger anticoagulation (one-sample log-rank p<0.03). During the study period, 681 (84%) AF episodes and 129 (16%) atrial tachycardias were detected in 291 patients (18%): 93% of episodes were detected remotely in 269 patients, 66% of whom had no history of AF. Medical interventions were necessary in 305 episodes, 85% of which were detected remotely. Reaction time was 1 (0-6) days for remotely-detected episodes and 33 (14-121) days for episodes detected in clinic (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large CIED population followed remotely for up to 4years, the incidence of thromboembolic events was less than half the estimations based on the CHA2DS2VASc risk profile.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Pacemakers; Remote monitoring; Stroke; Telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27340918     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based remote monitoring : Current evidence].

Authors:  David Duncker; Roman Michalski; Johanna Müller-Leisse; Christos Zormpas; Thorben König; Christian Veltmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 2.  Remote monitoring and telemedicine in heart failure: implementation and benefits.

Authors:  Jacopo Francesco Imberti; Alberto Tosetti; Davide Antonio Mei; Anna Maisano; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?

Authors:  Knut Tore Lappegård; Frode Moe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Home Monitoring of Cardiac Devices in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Jennifer C Miller; Devin Skoll; Leslie A Saxon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.931

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.