Literature DB >> 27339239

Insufficient evidence on whether to restore root-filled teeth with single crowns or routine fillings.

David McReynolds1, Brett Duane1.   

Abstract

Data sourcesMedline, Cochrane Oral Health Groups Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS.Study selectionThree authors independently assessed the abstracts of studies resulting from the above searches which compared indirect restorations of single endodontically treated teeth (ETT) to direct restoration of single ETT.Data extraction and synthesisTitles and abstracts of all reports identified through the electronic searches were assessed independently by two authors with any disagreements on eligibility resolved by a third reviewing author based on agreed upon inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Catastrophic failure of the restored tooth or restoration leading directly to extraction was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included patient quality of life, incidence of recurring caries, periodontal health status and cost of the use of different interventions. Data analysis was carried out using the, 'treatment as allocated', patient population, expressing estimates of intervention effect for dichotomous data as risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsOne trial which was judged to be at high risk of performance, detection and attrition bias was included. There was no clear difference between the crown and composite group and the composite only group for non-catastrophic failures of the restoration (1/54 versus 3/53; RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.04 to 3.05) or failures of the post (2/54 versus 1/53; RR 1.96; 95% CI 0.18 to 21.01) at three years. The quality of the evidence for these outcomes was judged to be very low. There was no evidence available for any secondary outcomes.ConclusionsInsufficient evidence exists to assess the effects of crowns compared to conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Until more evidence becomes available, clinicians should continue to base decisions about how to restore root-filled teeth on their own clinical experience, whilst taking into consideration the individual circumstances and preferences of their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27339239     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Dent        ISSN: 1462-0049


  17 in total

Review 1.  Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores--a review.

Authors:  Ingrid Peroz; Felix Blankenstein; Klaus-Peter Lange; Michael Naumann
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.677

Review 2.  Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature--Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations.

Authors:  Didier Dietschi; Olivier Duc; Ivo Krejci; Avishai Sadan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  Does the non-randomized controlled study have a place in the systematic review? A pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Ferriter; Nick Huband
Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health       Date:  2005

4.  Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration.

Authors:  H A Ray; M Trope
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.264

5.  Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jovito Adiel Skupien; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci; Niek Johannes Opdam; C M Kreulen; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts.

Authors:  C J Goodacre; K J Spolnik
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  J A Sorensen; J T Martinoff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Steven A Aquilino; Daniel J Caplan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 9.  Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies).

Authors:  Didier Dietschi; Olivier Duc; Ivo Krejci; Avishai Sadan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.677

10.  Holiday review. How random is the toss of a coin?

Authors:  Matthew P A Clark; Brian D Westerberg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Permanent First Molars Reinforced with Diagonal Horizontal Postdesign: A In vitro Study.

Authors:  Karunakaran Jeyaraman Venkataraman; Aravindhan Venkatapathi; Sathyanarayanan Balasubramanian; Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu; Senthil Kumar Swaminathan; Leo Sujith Samuel; Sathya Thanapathi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.