Literature DB >> 19969575

Holiday review. How random is the toss of a coin?

Matthew P A Clark1, Brian D Westerberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The toss of a coin has been a method used to determine random outcomes for centuries. It is still used in some research studies as a method of randomization, although it has largely been discredited as a valid randomization method. We sought to provide evidence that the toss of a coin can be manipulated.
METHODS: We performed a prospective experiment involving otolaryngology residents in Vancouver, Canada. The main outcome was the proportion of "heads" coin tosses achieved (out of 300 attempts) by each participant. Each of the participants attempted to flip the coin so as to achieve a heads result.
RESULTS: All participants achieved more heads than tails results, with 7 of the 13 participants having significantly more heads results (p<or=0.05). The highest proportion of heads achieved was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.62-0.73, p<0.001).
INTERPRETATION: Certain people are able to successfully manipulate the toss of a coin. This throws into doubt the validity of using a coin toss to determine a chance result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19969575      PMCID: PMC2789164          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  1 in total

1.  Probability of a tossed coin landing on edge.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics       Date:  1993-10
  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Effects of a 12-week structured circuit exercise program on physical fitness levels of children with autism spectrum condition and typically developing children.

Authors:  Ersin Arslan; Gonca Ince; Murat Akyüz
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2020-09-17

2.  Pharmaceutical care of adolescents with diabetes mellitus type 1: the DIADEMA study, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emina Obarcanin; Manfred Krüger; Petra Müller; Verena Nemitz; Holger Schwender; Snijezana Hasanbegovic; Sena Kalajdzisalihovic; Stephanie Läer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-04-28

3.  Insufficient evidence on whether to restore root-filled teeth with single crowns or routine fillings.

Authors:  David McReynolds; Brett Duane
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-06

4.  Cleansing efficacy of waist-shaped inter-dental brushes. A randomized-controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Dagmar Schnabl; Georg Goebel; Alice Kadletz; Hanna Gaenzer; René Steiner; Johannes Laimer; Ines Kapferer-Seebacher
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 8.728

5.  Unification of Epistemic and Ontic Concepts of Information, Probability, and Entropy, Using Cognizers-System Model.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Memories of the Future. Predictable and Unpredictable Information in Fractional Flipping a Biased Coin.

Authors:  Dimitri Volchenkov
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Foam Splint versus Spica Cast-Early Mobilization after Hip Reconstructive Surgery in Children-Preliminary Data from a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lorenz Pisecky; Gerhard Großbötzl; Manuel Gahleitner; Christian Stadler; Stella Stevoska; Christina Haas; Tobias Gotterbarm; Matthias Christoph Michael Klotz
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18

8.  Comparison of an interactive with a didactic educational intervention for improving the evidence-based practice knowledge of occupational therapists in the public health sector in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen Buchanan; Nandi Siegfried; Jennifer Jelsma; Carl Lombard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.