| Literature DB >> 27338950 |
Blanca Perez Sepulveda1, Tamsin Redgwell1, Branko Rihtman1, Frances Pitt1, David J Scanlan1, Andrew Millard2.
Abstract
Marine viruses are the most abundant biological entity in the oceans, the majority of which infect bacteria and are known as bacteriophages. Yet, the bulk of bacteriophages form part of the vast uncultured dark matter of the microbial biosphere. In spite of the paucity of cultured marine bacteriophages, it is known that marine bacteriophages have major impacts on microbial population structure and the biogeochemical cycling of key elements. Despite the ecological relevance of marine bacteriophages, there are relatively few isolates with complete genome sequences. This minireview focuses on knowledge gathered from these genomes put in the context of viral metagenomic data and highlights key advances in the field, particularly focusing on genome structure and auxiliary metabolic genes. © FEMS 2016.Entities:
Keywords: bacteriophage; genomics; marine
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27338950 PMCID: PMC4928673 DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Lett ISSN: 0378-1097 Impact factor: 2.742
Figure 1.Number of bacterial, phage and marine phage genomes submitted per year to the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC). Dates were extracted for all sequences within the EBI phage database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/genomes/phage.html). Data are only shown from 1982 onwards with the inception of publically available databases. Dates are representative of when the sequence was submitted to INSDC rather than when any subsequent papers were published. Prophages are not included unless they have been specifically sequenced independently of their host bacterium. Phages were classified as marine if they were isolated from a marine environment.
Figure 2.Scatter plot of genome size versus mol %G + C of marine phages and non-marine phages. Box and whisper plots for the range in genome size and range in mol %G + C are also plotted adjacent to the Y- and X-axis, respectively.
Figure 3.Genomic comparison of selected phages. (A) Cyanophage S-PM2, P-SSM5 and Syn9 compared to phage T4. Orange genes are those found in phage T4. Blue shading is a hypervariable region localised between gp16 and gp17 in Syn9 (Millard et al.2009). The structural gene module that is common to all T4likeviruses is highlighted in green (Hambly et al.2001). (B) T7likevirus comparison of cyanophages Syn5 and P-SSP7, Pseudoalteromonas phage RIO-1 with phage T7. T7 genes found in other phages are teal coloured. The genomic islands identified in P-SSP7 are highlighted in yellow (Labrie et al.2013). (C) N4likevirus comparison of roseophage DSS3P2, Pseudoalteromonas phage pYD6-A and Alteromonas phage vB_AmaP_AD45-P1 with phage N4. Roseophage N4-like phages are represented by DSS3P2, which has genes that have been acquired by roseophages and localised at the same position (highlighted in red) (Chan et al.2014).