| Literature DB >> 27338370 |
Chao Liu1,2, Yonghai Sun3, Qian Mao4, Xiaolei Guo5, Peng Li6, Yang Liu7, Na Xu8.
Abstract
Polysaccharides from Morchella esculenta have been proven to be functional and helpful for humans. The purpose of this study was to investigate the chemical structure and anti-proliferating and antitumor activities of a Morchella esculenta polysaccharide (MEP) extracted by pulsed electric field (PEF) in submerged fermentation. The endo-polysaccharide was separated and purified by column chromatography and Gel permeation chromatography, and analyzed by gas chromatography. The MEP with an average molecular weight of 81,835 Da consisted of xylose, glucose, mannose, rhamnose and galactose at the ratio of 5.4:5.0:6.5:7.8:72.3. Structure of MEP was further analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and ¹H and (13)C liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Apoptosis tests proved that MEP could inhibit the proliferation and growth of human colon cancer HT-29 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner within 48 h. This study provides more information on chemical structure of anti-proliferating polysaccharides isolated from Morchella esculenta.Entities:
Keywords: Morchella esculenta; anti-proliferating activity; chemical structure; polysaccharide; pulsed electric field
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27338370 PMCID: PMC4926515 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17060986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Experimental design of code levels and factors in respond surface methodology (RSM) by Box–Behnken design (BBD) matrix. MEP: Morchella esculenta polysaccharide.
| Run Order | X1 | X2 | X3 | MEP (µg·mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 50.21 |
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 38.15 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55.62 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 39.15 |
| 5 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 39.27 |
| 6 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 50.07 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 35.98 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53.08 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 37.23 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 46.96 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54.92 |
| 12 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 35.51 |
| 13 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 37.95 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.66 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 36.07 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.13 |
| 17 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 36.04 |
Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA).
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 932.2642 | 9 | 103.5849 | 27.53076 | 0.0001 | significant |
| X1 | 83.4632 | 1 | 83.4632 | 22.18282 | 0.0022 | ** |
| X2 | 95.70361 | 1 | 95.70361 | 25.43607 | 0.0015 | ** |
| X3 | 83.52781 | 1 | 83.52781 | 22.19999 | 0.0022 | ** |
| X1X2 | 30.25 | 1 | 30.25 | 8.039835 | 0.0252 | * |
| X1X3 | 30.0304 | 1 | 30.0304 | 7.98147 | 0.0256 | * |
| X2X3 | 6.375625 | 1 | 6.375625 | 1.694512 | 0.2342 | |
| 166.5724 | 1 | 166.5724 | 44.27157 | 0.0003 | ** | |
| 186.046 | 1 | 186.046 | 49.44725 | 0.0002 | ** | |
| 186.8866 | 1 | 186.8866 | 49.67067 | 0.0002 | ** | |
| Residual | 26.33761 | 7 | 3.762515 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 7.825525 | 3 | 2.608508 | 0.563634 | 0.6673 | not significant |
| Pure Error | 18.51208 | 4 | 4.62802 | |||
| Cor Total | 958.6018 | 16 |
df: degree of freedom; * : p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Yields and relevant molecular parameters of four peaks of F2 in gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis.
| Fractions | Parameters | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retention Time (min) | Yield (%) | ||||||||
| M1 | 13.054 | 25.575 | 198,950 | 222,344 | 256,908 | 222,344 | 1.11758 | 1.11758 | 1.15545 |
| M2 | 14.205 | 52.119 | 74,633 | 81,835 | 89,127 | 81,835 | 1.09651 | 1.09651 | 1.08909 |
| M3 | 20.308 | 13.929 | 413 | 428 | 443 | 428 | 1.03685 | 1.03685 | 1.03495 |
| M4 | 21.286 | 8.377 | 183 | 192 | 201 | 192 | 1.05083 | 1.05083 | 1.04301 |
Mn, MW, Mz, and Mv are present number, weight, z-average, and viscose molecular weight, respectively; MW/Mn means poly dispersity ratio.
Figure 1The effects of electric field intensity (X1), pulse number (X2) and material-to-liquid ratio (X3) on M. esculenta polysaccharide (MEP) yield of 3D response surface curves (a,c,e) and contours (b,d,f).
Figure 2Purification of crude MEP by column chromatography.
Figure 3High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) spectra of: F2 (a); and purified M2 (b).
Chemical analysis of M2 of MEP.
| Fraction | Total Sugar (%, | Sulphate (%) a | Uronic Acid (%) a.b | Monosaccharides Composition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M2 | 77.8 | 4.1 | 8.6 | Xyl | Glc | Man | Rha | Gal |
| 5.4 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.8 | 72.3 | ||||
a Percentage of the dry weight of F2(%, w/w); b the monosaccharide composition was detected by gas chromatography (GC) analysis (molar ratio).
Figure 4Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum of M2.
Figure 51H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (a) and 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (b) spectra of M2.
Chemical shifts (proton/carbon) of monosaccharide in M2 compared with model-determined compounds.
| NO. | Sugar Residue | 13C | Solvent | Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||
| A | →3)-β- | 106.38 | 76.49 | 84.73 | 70.95 | 78.17 | 63.53 | D2O(DSS) | [ |
| B | →3)-α- | 104.28 | 72.23 | 80.18 | 72.80 | 71.65 | 18.93 | D2O(DSS) | |
| C | [α-Glc(1→3)]n | 101.3 | 72.2 | 83.2 | 71.7 | 73.7 | 62.2 | D2O | [ |
| D | [β-Glc(1–2)-]n | 102.7 | 83.1 | 77.0 | 69.3 | 76.1 | 61.4 | D2O | |
| E | →3)-β- | 102.4 | 70.2 | 82.2 | 68.8 | 75.3 | 61.4 | DMSO | [ |
| F | →4)-3,6-anhydro-α- | 98.3 | 69.9 | 80.1 | 77.4 | 75.7 | 69.4 | DMSO | |
| G | →3)-β- | 102.18 | 76.83 | 81.35 | 70.36 | 78.21 | 62.85 | D2O | M2 spectra in |
| H | →3)-α- | 100.92 | 71.50 | 80.36 | 73.34 | 71.50 | 19.00 | D2O | |
| I | →4)-3,6-anhydro-α- | 98.13 | 69.56 | 80.0 | 77.66 | 75.73 | 68.25 | D2O | |
Figure 6The antitumor activity of M2 on HT-29 cells after different incubation periods and at different concentrations in 3-(4,5-cimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.
Figure 7M2-induced apoptosis in HT-29 cells: (a) natural apoptosis of HT-29 cells without M2 (Blank) at 48 h on flow cytometry; (c,d) apoptosis of M2-treated cells at 24 and 48 h, respectively, on flow cytometry; and (b) bar graph summarizes the percentage of apoptosis. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of six replicate. **: p < 0.01.
Coding table and selected values (obtained from previous studies) for experimental factors and levels in response surface method (RSM) for pulsed electric field (PEF) optimization.
| Symbol | Code Levels | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Field Intensity (kV·cm−1) | Pulse Number | Material to Liquid Ratio (g·mL−1) | ||
| X1 | −1 | 15 | 4 | 1:20 |
| X2 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 1:30 |
| X3 | 1 | 25 | 8 | 1:40 |