| Literature DB >> 27335759 |
Rina Kumari1, Sumit Singh1, Mohan Monisha2, Sourav Bhowmick1, Anindya Roy2, Neeladri Das1, Prolay Das1.
Abstract
Herein, we describe the successful construction of composite DNA nanostructures by the self-assembly of complementary symmetrical 2,6,14-triptycenetripropiolic acid (TPA)-DNA building blocks and zinc protoporphyrin IX (Zn PpIX). DNA-organic molecule scaffolds for the composite DNA nanostructure were constructed through covalent conjugation of TPA with 5'-C12-amine-terminated modified single strand DNA (ssDNA) and its complementary strand. The repeated covalent conjugation of TPA with DNA was confirmed by using denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF). The biologically relevant photosensitizer Zn PpIX was used to direct the hybridization-mediated self-assembly of DNA-TPA molecular building blocks as well as a model guest molecule within the DNA-TPA supramolecular self-assembly. The formation of fiber-like composite DNA nanostructures was observed. Native PAGE, circular dichroism (CD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have been utilized for analyzing the formation of DNA nanofibers after the coassembly. Computational methods were applied to discern the theoretical dimension of the DNA-TPA molecular building block of the nanofibers. A notable change in photocatalytic efficiency of Zn PpIX was observed when it was inside the TPA-DNA scaffold. The significant increase in ROS generation by Zn PpIX when trapped in this biocompatible DNA-TPA hybrid nanofiber may be an effective tool to explore photodynamic therapy (PDT) applications as well as photocatalytic reactions.Entities:
Keywords: 2,6,14-triptycenetripropiolic acid; DNA nanostructure; DNA self-assembly; DNA–organic hybrid; zinc protoporphyrin IX
Year: 2016 PMID: 27335759 PMCID: PMC4901925 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.7.62
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Scheme 1Schematic representation of creation of nanostructures from DNA–TPA hybrid self-assembly. The number and location of Zn PpIX molecules in the scheme are symbolic.
Sequences of ssDNA used for conjugation with TPA and subsequent self-assembly.
| sequence | |
| S1 | 5′-[(CH2)12-NH2]-TCA GTC AAC AGC-3’ |
| S2 | 5′-[(CH2)12-NH2]-GCT GTT GAC TGA-3’ |
Scheme 2Synthesis of 2,6,14-triptycenetripropiolic acid.
Figure 120% denaturing PAGE analysis of DNA (S1)–TPA conjugates showing a decrease in gel mobility of the conjugates upon successive conjugation of ssDNA strands to the triptycene core.
Figure 2Native PAGE image (12%) of self-assembly of dicojugate DNA–TPA units with 2 μM total ssDNA concentration. Lane 2 shows the assembly of DNA–TPA diconjugates from (S1)2–TPA and (S2)2–TPA.
Figure 3Native PAGE-gel image (8%) of self-assembled triconjugated DNA–TPA units with 2 μM total ssDNA concentration. Lane 5 shows the self-assembly of triconjugates in the presence of Zn PpIX.
Hydrodynamic size (nm) and PDI values for different systems obtained from number distribution analysis of DLS data. Zn PpIX was added during assembly.
| self-assembled system | average hydrodynamic radius (nm) | PDI |
| Zn PpIX | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.75 |
| S1 S2 DNA duplex + Zn PpIX | 96 ± 25 | 0.66 |
| DNA–TPA diconjugates | 169 ± 39 | 0.28 |
| DNA–TPA diconjugates + Zn PpIX | 178 ± 27 | 0.25 |
| DNA–TPA triconjugates | 900 ± 105 | 0.8 |
| DNA–TPA triconjugates + Zn PpIX | 1500 ± 78 | 0.23 |
Figure 4AFM images of the self-assembly of DNA–TPA tri-conjugates. A and B in the presence of Zn PpIX and C in the absence of Zn PpIX.
Figure 5Modeling studies involving S1–TPA and S2–TPA triconjugates showing a single tetrameric unit with square structure having extended ssDNA arms at the corner. The vertex length of the structure was found to be ca. 9.3 nm.
Figure 6The first-order-derivative melting curves of nanofibers (S1 DNA–TPA/S2 DNA–TPA triconjugate Zn PpIX coassembly) from self-assembly of DNA–TPA triconjugates from absorbance of DNA in solution at 260 nm.
Figure 7CD spectra showing the chirality and conformation of nanofiber (S1 DNA–TPA/S2 DNA–TPA triconjugate Zn PpIX coassembly) and their controls.
Figure 8UV–vis absorption spectra and steady-state fluorescent spectra of rhodamine 123 quantifying the photocatalytic activity of nanofibers (S1 DNA–TPA/S2 DNA–TPA triconjugate Zn PpIX coassembly) and their control.