| Literature DB >> 27335737 |
Brunella Perito1, Emilia Giorgetti2, Paolo Marsili3, Maurizio Muniz-Miranda4.
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have increasingly gained importance as antibacterial agents with applications in several fields due to their strong, broad-range antimicrobial properties. AgNP synthesis by pulsed laser ablation in liquid (PLAL) permits the preparation of stable Ag colloids in pure solvents without capping or stabilizing agents, producing AgNPs more suitable for biomedical applications than those prepared with common, wet chemical preparation techniques. To date, only a few investigations into the antimicrobial effect of AgNPs produced by PLAL have been performed. These have mainly been performed by ablation in water with nanosecond pulse widths. We previously observed a strong surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) signal from such AgNPs by "activating" the NP surface by the addition of a small quantity of LiCl to the colloid. Such surface effects could also influence the antimicrobial activity of the NPs. Their activity, on the other hand, could also be affected by other parameters linked to the ablation conditions, such as the pulse width. The antibacterial activity of AgNPs was evaluated for NPs obtained either by nanosecond (ns) or picosecond (ps) PLAL using a 1064 nm ablation wavelength, in pure water or in LiCl aqueous solution, with Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis as references for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. In all cases, AgNPs with an average diameter less than 10 nm were obtained, which has been shown in previous works to be the most effective size for bactericidal activity. The measured zeta-potential values were very negative, indicating excellent long-term colloidal stability. Antibacterial activity was observed against both microorganisms for the four AgNP formulations, but the ps-ablated nanoparticles were shown to more effectively inhibit the growth of both microorganisms. Moreover, LiCl modified AgNPs were the most effective, showing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in a restricted range of 1.0-3.7 µg/mL. An explanation is proposed for this result based on the increased surface reactivity of the metal surface due to the presence of positively charged active sites.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; colloid; laser ablation; nanoparticles; silver
Year: 2016 PMID: 27335737 PMCID: PMC4901816 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.7.40
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Summary of AgNP colloids and of their characteristics.
| Sample | Absorbance at 400 nm (OPL = 1 mm) | Pulse width (s) | Pulse energy (mJ) | Fluence on target (J/cm2) | Zeta potential (mV) | Average NP diameter | Ag concentration (μg/mL) |
| AgNPsH2Ops | 0.9 | 25 × 10−12 | 15 | 0.7 | −33 ± 8 (57%) | 2.2 (1.5/4.4) | 84.1 |
| AgNPsH2Ons | 2.3 | 25 × 10−9 | 100 | 4 | −50 ± 7 (51%) | 2.2 (1.3/3.0) | 184.4 |
| AgNPsLiClps | 0.4 | 25 × 10−12 | 15 | 0.7 | −55 ± 7 (100%) | 3.3 (2.1/6.2) | 47.0 |
| AgNPsLiClns | 1.5 | 25 × 10−9 | 100 | 4 | −35 ± 7 (61%) | 0.9 (0.5/1.2) | 74.1 |
aThe left (σ−) and right (σ+) 1/e half widths of the size distribution, respectively.
Figure 1UV–vis absorption spectra of AgNPs in colloidal suspensions obtained with (a) ps and (b) ns laser ablation.
Figure 2Typical TEM image and size (average diameter) distribution of (a) AgNPsH2Ops and (b) AgNPsLiClps.
Figure 3Typical TEM image and size (average diameter) distribution of (a) AgNPsH2Ons and (b) AgNPsLiClns.
MIC and MBC values of the four AgNPs samples against E. coli XL1Blue and B. subtilis 168 (obtained at least by two independent experiments, each in duplicate).
| Antimicrobial | ||||
| MIC (μg/mL) | MBC (μg/mL) | MIC (μg/mL) | MBC (μg/mL) | |
| AgNPsH2Ops | 8.4 | 8.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| AgNPsH2Ons | 9.2 | 18.4 | 9.2 | 18.4 |
| AgNPsLiClps | 1.6 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| AgNPsLiClns | 3.7 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Ampicillin | 14.5 | 14.5 | 50.0 | 75.0 |
Viable count of E. coli cultures grown in microtiter plates in the absence and in the presence of AgNPs (MBC value) at different incubation times.
| Incubation time (min) | |||
| 0 | 3.5 × 106 | 2.8 × 106 | 3.2 × 106 |
| 45 | 3.3 × 106 | 2.5 × 106 | 2.4 × 106 |
| 120 | 5.4 × 106 | 1.7 × 106 | 2.0 × 106 |
| 180 | 4.3 × 107 | 2.3 × 105 | 1.5 × 104 |
| 1440 | 8.0 × 108 | <10a | <10a |
aAbsence of CFUs growth by plating 0.1 mL of the undiluted culture.