| Literature DB >> 27335605 |
Ahmed Ibrahim Amin1, Noha Mohamed Hegazy2, Khadiga Salah Ibrahim2, Heba Mahdy-Abdallah2, Hamdy A A Hammouda1, Eman Essam Shaban2.
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to investigate the effects of computer monitor-emitted radiation on thyroid hormones and the possible protective role of zinc supplementation.Entities:
Keywords: Electromagnetic field; FT3; FT4; TSH; Zinc; computer; thyroid hormones
Year: 2016 PMID: 27335605 PMCID: PMC4908750 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
TSH, FT3 and FT4 levels among males and females of studied groups
| Group | Gender | Mean ± SD | LSD | ANOVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-ratio | P-value | |||||
| TSH (mlu/L) | Group C (No=63) | M (33) | 2.376 ± 0.50 | ---- | 2.740 | < 0.05 |
| F (30) | 2.502 ± 0.55 | (BM, BF) | ||||
| Group B (No=42) | M (19) | 2.096 ± 0.44 | (CF, AF) | |||
| F (23) | 2.068 ± 0.32 | (CF, AF) | ||||
| Group A | M | 2.135 ± 0.29 | (AF) | |||
| F | 2.551 ± 0.37 | (BM, BF, AM) | ||||
| FT3 (ng/dl) | Group C (No=63) | M (33) | 2.14 ± 0.497 | ---- | 1.718 | NS |
| F (30) | 2.29 ± 0.650 | (BF) | ||||
| Group B (No=42) | M (19) | 1.94 ± 0.253 | ---- | |||
| F (23) | 1.74 ± 0.463 | (CF, AF) | ||||
| Group A | M | 2.07 ± 0.517 | ---- | |||
| F | 2.20 ± 0.05 | (BF) | ||||
| FT4 (ng/dl) | Group C (No=63) | M (33) | 1.09 ± 0.112 | (BF) | 2.680 | < 0.05 |
| F (30) | 1.10 ± 0.088 | (BF) | ||||
| Group B (No=42) | M (19) | 1.05 ± 0.156 | ---- | |||
| F (23) | 0.96 ± 0.168 | (CM, CF, AF) | ||||
| Group A | M | 1.03 ± 0.126 | (AF) | |||
| F | 1.14 ± 0.085 | (BF, AM) | ||||
M: male, F: Female. CM: Control group male, CF: Control group female, BM: before supplement male, BF: before supplement female, AM: After supplement male, and AF: After supplement female, NS: non-significant.
Comparison of zinc concentration between the three studied groups according to gender
| Group | Gender | Mean ± SD | LSD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group C (No = 63) | Male (33) | 130.4 ± 22.4 | ---- |
| Female (30) | 148.1 ± 23.5 | BF | |
| Group B (No = 42) | Male (19) | 130.3 ± 18.4 | ---- |
| Female (23) | 119.9 ± 19.02 | (CF, AM, AF) | |
| Group A | Male | 139.3 ± 15.7 | BF |
| female | 137.8 ± 21.7 | BF | |
| ANOVA | F-ratio | 2.371 | |
| P-value | = 0.05 | ||
CM: group C male, CF: group C female, BM: group B male, BF: group B female, AM: group A male, AF: group A female.
Figure 1Correlation between zinc concentration and employment duration in years.
Figure 2Correlation between TSH and employment duration in years in group B.
Figure 3Correlation between FT3 and employment duration in years in group B.
Figure 4Correlation between FT4 and employment duration in years in the group B.