Cindy Y Chang1, Samer Abujaber2, Teri A Reynolds3, Carlos A Camargo4,5, Ziad Obermeyer2,5. 1. Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department for the Management of Noncommunicable Diseases, Disability, Violence and Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the global and national burden of emergency conditions, and compare them to emergency care usage rates. METHODS: We coded all 291 Global Burden of Disease 2010 conditions into three categories to estimate emergency burden: conditions that, if not addressed within hours to days of onset, commonly lead to serious disability or death; conditions with common acute decompensations that lead to serious disability or death; and non-emergencies. Emergency care usage rates were obtained from a systematic literature review on emergency care facilities in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), supplemented by national health system reports. FINDINGS: All 15 leading causes of death and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) globally were conditions with potential emergent manifestations. We identified 41 facility-based reports in 23 countries, 12 of which were in LMICs; data for 17 additional countries were obtained from national or regional reports on emergency usage. Burden of emergency conditions was the highest in low-income countries, with median DALYs of 47 728 per 100 000 population (IQR 45 253-50 085) in low-income, 25 186 (IQR 21 982-40 480) in middle-income and 15 691 (IQR 14 649-16 382) in high-income countries. Patterns were similar using deaths to measure burden and excluding acute decompensations from the definition of emergency conditions. Conversely, emergency usage rates were the lowest in low-income countries, with median 8 visits per 1000 population (IQR 6-10), 78 (IQR 25-197) in middle-income and 264 (IQR 177-341) in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher burden of emergency conditions, emergency usage rates are substantially lower in LMICs, likely due to limited access to emergency care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the global and national burden of emergency conditions, and compare them to emergency care usage rates. METHODS: We coded all 291 Global Burden of Disease 2010 conditions into three categories to estimate emergency burden: conditions that, if not addressed within hours to days of onset, commonly lead to serious disability or death; conditions with common acute decompensations that lead to serious disability or death; and non-emergencies. Emergency care usage rates were obtained from a systematic literature review on emergency care facilities in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), supplemented by national health system reports. FINDINGS: All 15 leading causes of death and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) globally were conditions with potential emergent manifestations. We identified 41 facility-based reports in 23 countries, 12 of which were in LMICs; data for 17 additional countries were obtained from national or regional reports on emergency usage. Burden of emergency conditions was the highest in low-income countries, with median DALYs of 47 728 per 100 000 population (IQR 45 253-50 085) in low-income, 25 186 (IQR 21 982-40 480) in middle-income and 15 691 (IQR 14 649-16 382) in high-income countries. Patterns were similar using deaths to measure burden and excluding acute decompensations from the definition of emergency conditions. Conversely, emergency usage rates were the lowest in low-income countries, with median 8 visits per 1000 population (IQR 6-10), 78 (IQR 25-197) in middle-income and 264 (IQR 177-341) in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher burden of emergency conditions, emergency usage rates are substantially lower in LMICs, likely due to limited access to emergency care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
access to care; emergency care systems; emergency department utilisation; global health
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Joshua A Hilton; Ellen J Weber; Annechien J Alkemade; Hasan Al Shabanah; Philip D Anderson; Michael Bernhard; Alessio Bertini; André Gries; Santiago Ferrandiz; Vijaya Arun Kumar; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Barbara Hogan; Bo Madsen; Suzanne Mason; Gunnar Ohlén; Timothy Rainer; Niels Rathlev; Eric Revue; Drew Richardson; Mehdi Sattarian; Michael J Schull Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Philip D Anderson; Robert E Suter; Terrence Mulligan; Gautam Bodiwala; Junaid A Razzak; Charles Mock Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-02-11 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Olive C Kobusingye; Adnan A Hyder; David Bishai; Eduardo Romero Hicks; Charles Mock; Manjul Joshipura Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Rachel T Moresky; Mark Bisanzo; Beth L Rubenstein; Stephanie J Hubbard; Hillary Cohen; Helen Ouyang; Herbert C Duber; Regan H Marsh Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Ziad Obermeyer; Samer Abujaber; Maggie Makar; Samantha Stoll; Stephanie R Kayden; Lee A Wallis; Teri A Reynolds Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Morgan C Broccoli; Rachel Moresky; Julia Dixon; Ivy Muya; Cara Taubman; Lee A Wallis; Emilie J Calvello Hynes Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2018-02-15
Authors: Ourania S Kotsiou; David S Srivastava; Panagiotis Kotsios; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Megan M Rybarczyk; Nicholas Ludmer; Morgan C Broccoli; Sean M Kivlehan; Michelle Niescierenko; Mark Bisanzo; Keegan A Checkett; Shada A Rouhani; Andrea G Tenner; Heike Geduld; Teri Reynolds Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 2.462
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Naima T Joseph; Goodarz Danaei; Sebastián García-Saisó; Joshua A Salomon Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: So Yeon Joyce Kong; Dae Han Wi; Young Sun Ro; Sang Do Shin; Joongsik Jeong; Yun Jeong Kim; Joseph Kamgno; Etoundi Mballa Georges Alain; Bonaventure Hollong; Young Jin Oh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Georgina Phillips; Anne Creaton; Pai Airdhill-Enosa; Patrick Toito'ona; Berlin Kafoa; Gerard O'Reilly; Peter Cameron Journal: Lancet Reg Health West Pac Date: 2020-07-27