Kathryn Anne McMillan1, Alison Kirk1, Allan Hewitt1, Sandra MacRury2. 1. 1 Physical Activity for Health Group, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. 2. 2 Highland Diabetes Institute, University of Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.
Abstract
AIM: The aim was to review studies examining the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of mobile-based technology for promoting active lifestyles in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). BACKGROUND: Benefits of leading an active lifestyle following a diagnosis of T2D, including improved glycemic control, have been reported. Studies examining the specific use of mobile-based technologies to promote an active lifestyle in T2D have not previously been reviewed. METHODS: Research studies examining effectiveness, feasibility or acceptability of mobile-based technology for active lifestyle promotion for T2D management were included (n = 9). The databases searched included PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library (January 2005 to October 2015). Studies were categorized as (1) informing, (2) monitoring, (3) provoking, or (4) sustaining behavior change. RESULTS: Technologies used included smartphone or tablet apps, diabetes personal digital assistant, continuous glucose monitor and accelerometer, pedometer, and a website delivered by a smartphone. No articles examined the effectiveness of mobile-based technology in monitoring health behaviors and behavior change. Four of the studies found mobile-based technology to be motivational and supportive for behavior change. The visual reinforcement was identified as motivational. The feasibility and acceptability of using mobile-based technology to provide sustained lifestyle change and the effectiveness of mobile-based technology in monitoring health behaviors and behavior change have not been investigated. No studies examined all 3 of the outcomes or focused decreasing the participants' sedentary behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Limited research has examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of mobile-based technology to promote active lifestyles and subsequently good diabetes management in people with T2D.
AIM: The aim was to review studies examining the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of mobile-based technology for promoting active lifestyles in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). BACKGROUND: Benefits of leading an active lifestyle following a diagnosis of T2D, including improved glycemic control, have been reported. Studies examining the specific use of mobile-based technologies to promote an active lifestyle in T2D have not previously been reviewed. METHODS: Research studies examining effectiveness, feasibility or acceptability of mobile-based technology for active lifestyle promotion for T2D management were included (n = 9). The databases searched included PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library (January 2005 to October 2015). Studies were categorized as (1) informing, (2) monitoring, (3) provoking, or (4) sustaining behavior change. RESULTS: Technologies used included smartphone or tablet apps, diabetes personal digital assistant, continuous glucose monitor and accelerometer, pedometer, and a website delivered by a smartphone. No articles examined the effectiveness of mobile-based technology in monitoring health behaviors and behavior change. Four of the studies found mobile-based technology to be motivational and supportive for behavior change. The visual reinforcement was identified as motivational. The feasibility and acceptability of using mobile-based technology to provide sustained lifestyle change and the effectiveness of mobile-based technology in monitoring health behaviors and behavior change have not been investigated. No studies examined all 3 of the outcomes or focused decreasing the participants' sedentary behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Limited research has examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of mobile-based technology to promote active lifestyles and subsequently good diabetes management in people with T2D.
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Steven T Johnson; Mila Luchak; Cathy Pollock; Nicholas L Holt; Annabel Leahy; Tanis Liebreich; Ronald J Sigal; Normand G Boulé Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Eirik Årsand; Dag Helge Frøisland; Stein Olav Skrøvseth; Taridzo Chomutare; Naoe Tatara; Gunnar Hartvigsen; James T Tufano Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2012-09-01
Authors: David W Dunstan; Bronwyn A Kingwell; Robyn Larsen; Genevieve N Healy; Ester Cerin; Marc T Hamilton; Jonathan E Shaw; David A Bertovic; Paul Z Zimmet; Jo Salmon; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kristin L Schneider; Ryan T Crews; Vasanth Subramanian; Elizabeth Moxley; Sungsoon Hwang; Frank E DiLiberto; Laura Aylward; Jermaine Bean; Sai Yalla Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-01-18